Rolling Pebbles & Wheels: Analyzing Motion

AI Thread Summary
A wheel of radius R rolling with velocity V can cause a pebble placed on top to fly off if V exceeds sqrt(Rg). If V is less than sqrt(Rg) and the coefficient of friction is 1, the pebble will begin to slide after the wheel has rotated through a specific angle, determined by the equation theta = arccos[(1/sqrt(2))(V^2/Rg)] - pi/4. The forces acting on the pebble include gravitational force, normal force, and frictional force, which must be balanced to prevent slipping. The analysis involves resolving these forces and applying conditions for centripetal motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
anand
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wheel of radius R rolls along the ground with velocity V.
A pebble is carefully released on top of the wheel so that it is instantaneously at rest on the wheel.
(a) Show that the pebble will immediately fly off the wheel if V> sqrt(Rg)
(b) Show that in the case where V< sqrt(Rg) and the coefficient of friction is u=1,the pebble starts to slide when it has rotated through an angle given by theta=arccos[(1/sqrt(2))(V^2/Rg)]-pi/4


The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried resolving the forces along a set of axes parallel and perpendicular to the surface of the sphere,but I can't arrive at the required answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For no slipping the gravitational force must be less then the required centripetal force.
The wheel is rolling, so the path of the point on the rim is not a circle but a cycloid.
 
What about the second part?
 
EDIT: Funny... I didn't know how to do this question when I first started this post, but the answer came to me while I was parsing all the tex eqns below.


3. The attempt at a solution

Since the wheel is rolling at a steady velocity V, we can consider the inertial frame with origin at the center of the wheel. At a displacement \theta from the vertical, the forces on the pebble are the following:
  1. a normal force N exerted by the wheel in the outward radial direction
  2. gravitational force mg in the downward vertical direction
  3. frictional force \mu N in the counterclockwise tangential direction. This is just N since \mu=1.

Also, up until the point that the pebble slips, we know:
<br /> N - mg cos(\theta) = -m \omega^2 r<br />
or
<br /> N = mg cos(\theta) -m \omega^2 r<br />

In other words, the centripetal force equals N minus the inward radial component of mg.

The pebble slips when the tangential component of force in the clockwise direction exceeds the tangential component of force in the counterclockwise direction. This is because the tangential acceleration (angular acceleration + coriolis term) equals 0 in our inertial frame. So, we want to find \theta such that:


mgsin(\theta) &gt; N, or, plugging in for N from above,
mgsin(\theta) &gt; mg cos(\theta) -m \omega^2 r
mgsin(\theta) - mgcos(\theta) &gt; -m \omega^2 r
g (sin(\theta) - cos(\theta)) &gt; - \omega^2 r
g (\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} sin(\theta) - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} cos(\theta)) &gt; - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \omega^2 r
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} cos(\theta) - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} sin(\theta) &lt; \frac{\omega^2 r}{g \sqrt{2}}
cos(\pi / 4)cos(\theta) - sin(\pi / 4)sin(\theta) &lt; \frac{\omega^2 r}{g \sqrt{2}}
cos(\theta + \pi / 4) &lt; \frac{\omega^2 r}{g \sqrt{2}}
cos(\theta + \pi / 4) &lt; \frac{v^2}{rg \sqrt{2}}
\theta + \pi / 4 &lt; arccos(\frac{v^2}{rg \sqrt{2}})
\theta &lt; arccos(\frac{v^2}{rg \sqrt{2}}) - \pi / 4
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top