Show EM Wave equation invariant under a Lorentz Transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the invariance of the electromagnetic wave equation under Lorentz transformations. Participants outline the necessary steps, including transforming the variables and applying the chain rule for partial derivatives. A key point of confusion arises regarding the derivative of the transformed variables, particularly how to derive \(\frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\) and \(\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}\). Clarifications are provided on treating other variables as constants during differentiation, leading to a better understanding of the relationships between the transformed and original variables. Ultimately, the participants work through the algebra to confirm the invariance of the wave equation.
Antic_Hay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the electromagnetic wave equation

\frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial x^{2}} +<br /> \frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial y^{2}} +<br /> \frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial z^{2}} -<br /> \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial t^2}

is invariant under a Lorentz transformation.

Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations:

x&#039; = \frac{x - vt}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

t&#039; = \frac{t - \frac{v}{c^2}x}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

y&#039; = y

z&#039; = z

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I know exactly what I'm supposed to do here, transform the equations from x to x', y to y' etc. Then rearrange terms and show that the wave equation with x,y,z, and t is equal to the wave equation with x', y', z', and t'.

I understand the method is to get \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x}, then use the chain rule ( \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x&#039;}\frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} ), and similarly for t -> t', then a bit of simple algebra and the answer should pop out the other end.

My only problem is that I have no idea what \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} is...in fact, I do know, since I have been told, that \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}, but I have no idea how that follows from the Lorentz transforms, could someone give me a hint in deriving it?

(My attempt was simply saying \partial x&#039; = \frac{\partial x - v\partial t&#039;}{1 - v^2/c^2}, but then dividing that by \partial x&#039; I'd get \frac{1 - \frac{\partial t&#039;}{\partial t}}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}, which isn't right...

As you can tell, I'm not really very comfortable with partial derivatives or differential calculus, so I'm probably doing something really silly in that derivation above...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply take the partial derivative of x' with respect to x. Same as taking a normal derivative of x' but treat all the variables except x as constants
 
Ah, that made sense, I knew it would be something trivial, I was just approaching it weirdly.

Great, have the answer now, thanks :)
 
OK, I thought I had the answer but this but it turns out I don't...

I want to calculate \frac{\partial t&#039;}{\partial t}

So I have t&#039; = \frac{t - \frac{vx}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

The answer is supposedly \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

I don't see how this would be...the bottom line is a constant term so looking at the top line alone,

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} t is obviously 1, fine, but I don't see how \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (-\frac{vx}{c^2}) = 0, surely x is a function of t, so we get

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} x = \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} = v so \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (t - vx/c^2) = 1 - v^2/c^2 for the derivative of the top line?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top