Solve Balmer's Formula for Wavelengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter elephantorz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for the wavelengths using Balmer's formula, specifically for two series of wavelengths. The formula provided is λ = 94.18 nm * (1/m² - 1/n²), where m and n are integers. Participants express confusion over the application of the formula, particularly regarding the values of m and n, and the need for a mathematical approach to derive a general formula from the given series. Suggestions include analyzing the differences between successive numbers to identify patterns and considering the possibility of using frequencies instead of wavelengths. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding a comprehensive formula while acknowledging the utility of Balmer's formula in specific cases.
elephantorz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Balmer's Formula.

1. I am to find the formula of each series of wavelengths:
  • 12500, 31.25, 13.90, 7.81, and 5.00 nm
  • 375, 900, 1575, 2400, 3375, and 4500 nm
***Also, n might not always equal 1.

2. \lambda = \frac{94.18 nm} ({\frac{1}{m^{2}}) - (\frac{1}{n^{2}})})
Where m = 1, 2, 3, ... and n = m+1, m+2, ...​
3. My prof said that all I had to do was plug and chug, but I am not exactly sure what she meant by that, and do I assume that m is just zero at times?
I want to know if there is a way I can do this mathematically? She told me to THINK squares, so I attempted to take the square root of the numbers.

Any guidance will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wanted to clarify since I seem to have found the second one, it is talking about finding a FORMULA, so Balmer's formula is really useless in a way.

If a Mod would rename this I would really appreciate it, rename it to: Finding Formula given a series.
 
And I just figured out the second one, what a waste of forum-space!

Thanks anyway!

:D
 
One way is to take differences between succesive numbers, and see if a pattern emerges.
Take the differences of the differences is that doesn't work. If the differences are constant after n steps the numbers can be produced with a n'th degree polynomial.

since the numbers are wavelengths, you could try the frequencies as well.

I think the first number from a needs to be 125.00
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K