Solving for Volume and Mass Absorption Coefficients in Foggy Astrophysics Class

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating volume and mass absorption coefficients for light emitted by streetlamps in foggy conditions. The observer notes that the radiation flux from the second lamp is five times that of the third, leading to initial calculations using the Beer-Lambert law. However, the accuracy of these results is questioned due to the non-homogeneous nature of fog and the directional emission of light from streetlamps. Suggestions include using the Mie scattering equation for better accuracy and taking measurements at various distances. Overall, the complexity of fog as a medium poses challenges in obtaining precise coefficients.
stuffy
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem...

Consider a row of isotropically emitting streetlamps 15m apart. On a foggy light, an observer standing next to the 1st light notes the radiation flux from the 2nd light is 5.0 times that of the 3rd. The last streetlamp definitely seen is the 12th.
If the air+fog density is 1.20x10^-3 g/cm^3, what are the volume and mass absorption coeff?

This is my work so far...

F2 = 5F[SIZE]3

Using the equation dIv/ds = -kvIv
I set Iv=Fv (Intensity = flux)
therefore dFv/Fv = -kvds
Integrating the left side from F2 to F3, the right hand side from 0 to s.
I got ln(F3/F2) = -ks, where F2 = 5F[SIZE]3
so k = -ln(1/5) / s, where s = 15m

here i got that k = .001073 (1/cm) for volume absorption coeff
and 0.89 cm^2/g for the mass absorption coeff...

They don't seem right, can anyone give a better direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No takers?

According to my calculations, the 2nd streetlap is about 9 million times "brighter" than the 12th. Optical depth of the 2nd lamp is around 1.7, 12th about 18.
 


Your work so far seems to be on the right track. However, there are a few things to consider in order to get more accurate results.

Firstly, the equation you are using, dIv/ds = -kvIv, is the Beer-Lambert law, which relates the intensity of light to its absorption coefficient and the distance it travels through a medium. This law assumes that the medium is homogeneous, meaning that the density and composition of the medium do not change along the path of the light. In this case, the fog density is given, but it is important to note that fog is not a homogeneous medium. It is made up of tiny water droplets that scatter and absorb light in a non-uniform manner. This can affect the accuracy of your results.

Secondly, the equation you have used assumes that the light from the streetlamps is isotropic, meaning that it is emitted in all directions equally. However, in reality, streetlamps emit light in a specific direction, which may not be isotropic. This can also affect the accuracy of your results.

To improve your results, you could try using a more accurate equation for light absorption in fog, such as the Mie scattering equation, which takes into account the non-uniform nature of fog particles. Additionally, you could try taking measurements at different distances from the streetlamps and averaging your results to account for any directional emission of light.

Overall, solving for volume and mass absorption coefficients in foggy astrophysics class can be a challenging problem due to the complex nature of fog as a medium. It is important to consider the limitations of the equations and assumptions made in order to get more accurate results.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top