SpaceX Starship development: fifth flight, captures booster

In summary, SpaceX successfully stacked a fully-sized Starship and Super Heavy rocket. The first launch is still pending FAA approval, but is expected around December 31.
  • #246
Flight discussion happened here

The FAA confirmed that there is no incident investigation after the fourth flight as both ship and booster flew their nominal mission. SpaceX could launch another mission with the same profile as soon as they are ready.

It's possible they'll try to catch the booster with IFT-5. Getting that approved will take some time.

SpaceX is exchanging the way the heat shield tiles are attached to ship 30. Future Starships will have their flaps a bit farther to the back, reducing the control authority but also reducing heat loads.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #247
Slow motion of a six Raptor static fire (the ship being prepared for the fifth flight):



Link in case the embedding doesn't work.
 
  • #248
Looks like the fifth flight won't happen before late November.
  • because the ship isn't ready - it is
  • because the booster isn't ready - it is
  • because the launch pad isn't ready - it is
  • because they are still working on landing tests - everything is ready
  • because there are safety concerns about the landing process - resolved
  • because there is too much mercury in the deluge water - made up by CNBC
  • because a steel ring will crash into the ocean at a slightly different position compared to the previous flight
  • because the radius where the sonic boom is audible might be slightly larger than previously approved
It's a simple, inert structural steel ring between booster and ship that gets discarded after staging and boostback burn and crashes into the ocean. It doesn't affect any life in the ocean unless it directly hits something on impact. And that was already approved - the fifth flight just changes the impact location a bit. That delays the launch by at least two months.

Unsurprisingly, SpaceX isn't happy.
 
  • #249
SpaceX recovered some components of the booster from the fourth flight. It performed a successful soft "landing" at a simulated capture height, but then dropped down into the ocean which broke things, and of course it has been in the water for a while now. Part of the engine section

 
  • #250
No FAA approval yet, but SpaceX is now optimistic to have it for an October 13 launch (this Sunday). They have obtained all the road closures, exclusion zones and so on, and prepare the rocket for launch. The booster capture is still planned.
 
  • #251
They're very optimistic.
According to this article, they have installed the explosives for the Flight Termination System. That article also describes what that indicates for the launch schedule.
 
  • #253
  • Like
Likes mfb
  • #255
Capture!

(ah, and the ship is in almost-orbit as planned)

1728822618595.png



1728822652975.png
 
  • Like
Likes nsaspook and Rive
  • #256
That was ... spectacular.
And it's just half of the show so far.
 
  • #257
Reentry starting very soon. 115 km now.

The reentry looks much smoother than last time. Almost no small pieces falling off. No big flap maneuvers. It's super stable at 75 km, peak heating.
 
  • #258
And successful touchdown. Exploded shortly after tipping over. They had some buoys in the ocean at the expected landing spot and it looks like it landed within a few hundred meters of one. Can't be off by kilometers, might have hit the spot exactly.

Still a bit of flap damage but it kept working as a flap throughout. A really successful flight overall.

Next (tomorrow): Europa Clipper on Falcon Heavy.

SpaceX already has the permission to repeat this flight profile for a sixth flight, and it's likely they will. More data on all flight phases, further improvements to the hinge. More confidence that Starship can reenter and stay intact before they apply for permission to reenter over the US/Mexico for a ship capture.
Maybe we finally get the in-flight Raptor relight demo and then fully orbital missions from flight 7 on.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, nsaspook and .Scott
  • #259

4K] Watch SpaceX Catch A Starship Rocket From Space!!!​

 
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970
  • #260
nsaspook said:

4K] Watch SpaceX Catch A Starship Rocket From Space!!!​


For those that can't get the above link to work, try this one:


Launch is at 2hrs 24min (2:24)
Recapture by launch tower at 2:31

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • #261
Tom.G said:
For those that can't get the above link to work, try this one:


Launch is at 2hrs 24min (2:24)
Recapture by launch tower at 2:31

Cheers,
Tom

That is the craziest thing I have ever seen, on earth.
 
  • #262
They have lowered the booster on the launch mount and attached the Quick Disconnect, i.e. the thing that fuels the booster, provides electric power on the ground and so on. This shows that all relevant bits survived well enough to still fit together, and it lets them fully detank the booster. They'll likely remove it from the launch mount soon and disassemble it partially to inspect it in detail. It won't fly again, although a few components might. If things go really well we might see some additional tests on the launch pad. Some engine nozzles have been damaged, so probably no engines involved, but maybe we get tanking tests?

High resolution image of the landing booster:
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #263

Starship Launch and Booster Catch Super Cut​

 
  • Love
Likes Filip Larsen and pinball1970
  • #264
nsaspook said:

Starship Launch and Booster Catch Super Cut​


There should be a wow/holy dang emoji
 
  • #266
Good flight for ITF-6. Booster was not recovered due to an unspecified issue, but landed safely in the Gulf of Mexico. It did suffer a catastrophic failure of the fuel tank when it tipped over, though, producing a spectacular fireball of burning methane.

Starship successfully reentered and landed pretty much exactly on target, with at least one buoy camera and another long range camera capturing the action. Looked like one of the engines might have cut out at the last moment, but it splashed down safely, tipped over… and also promptly destroyed its propellant tanks. Not as spectacular but the long range camera clearly showed a major collapse of the structure.

Given the direction of the forces after both vehicles tipped over, I am completely unsurprised that they failed after hitting the water.
 

Similar threads

Replies
77
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
11K
Back
Top