Special relativity and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analysis of a uniformly accelerated particle along the x-axis in the context of special relativity. The particle's acceleration is constant in its instantaneous rest frame, leading to the equations for position and time as functions of proper time. Transformations to the lab frame are applied using Lorentz transformations, but there are concerns about the accuracy of the derived equations. Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying the principles of special relativity, especially when the particle's velocity is not zero. The need for a reevaluation of the approach is emphasized, particularly regarding the integration of velocity and the validity of the equations in different frames.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
N
Relevant Equations
N
A particle is moving along the x-axis. It is uniformly accelerated in the sense
that the acceleration measured in its instantaneous rest frame is always g, a constant.
Find x and t as functions of the proper time τ assuming the particle passes through
x0 at time t = 0 with zero velocity.I

n particle frame, the acceleration is constant and given by g.

So we have $$dv/d\tau = g \implies x = x_o + v_ot + g\tau^2/2$$
Using the initial conditions,$$ x = x_o + g\tau^2/2 $$

So now we have to transform it to the rest frame coordinates/lab frame.

$$\begin{pmatrix}
ct'\\x'

\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}
\gamma & \gamma \beta \\
\gamma \beta & \gamma
\end{pmatrix}

\begin{pmatrix}
ct \\ x = x_o + g\tau^2/2

\end{pmatrix}$$

I am using beta instead of minus beta, because i am changing from a frame in motion to a frame in rest.

Now, assuming that $$(dv/dt) dt/d\tau = g \implies v= gt/\gamma$$
And so, $$\gamma = \sqrt{1+g^2t^2}$$
$$\beta = -gt/(c\gamma)$$

that implies $$t` = \sqrt{1+g^2t^2}(c\tau + \beta*( x_o + g\tau^2/2))/c$$
and $$x' = \sqrt{1+g^2t^2}(c \tau \beta +(x_o + g\tau^2/2))$$

But i am not sure about these results i get, i have the impression i am doing something wrong. Is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might be helpful to see the form of the equations when \beta is small. (Correspondence principle.)
 
robphy said:
It might be helpful to see the form of the equations when \beta is small. (Correspondence principle.)
I think i could have had a mistake when i integrated the v, reading it again... But, i think what's matter more to me is if the approach is right. I mean, solve it using the proper time, and so changing to the rest frame using the inverse matrix transform, what do you think?
 
You only have ##dx/d\tau = g## instantaneously in any frame when the particle is at rest in that frame. As soon as the particle deviates from zero velocity in that frame, it is no longer valid. Therefore you willhave to rethink your approach.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top