Spring Constant and Distance: Find the Stretch of Each Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter prettyinpink
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how the spring constant and stretch distance change when a spring is cut into two shorter springs. The original spring with 100 coils stretches 0.170 m under an unknown weight, leading to a spring constant calculated as k = w/0.170. When the spring is cut into two 50-coil springs, the new spring constant becomes 2k, as it is inversely proportional to the number of coils. Each of the two new springs will stretch half the distance of the original spring, resulting in a stretch of 0.085 m for each spring when supporting the same weight. The conversation emphasizes the importance of calculating the spring constants and distances step by step to avoid confusion.
prettyinpink
16
0
Recall that the spring constant is inversely proportional to the number of coils in the spring, or that shorter springs equate to stiffer springs. An object is attached to the lower end of a 100-coil spring that is hanging from the ceiling. The spring stretches by 0.170 m. The spring is then cut into two identical springs of 50 coils each. As the drawing shows, each spring is attached between the ceiling and the object. By how much does each spring stretch?

I know the equation F=-Kx applies...I know that it should be 2k and 1/2x from there confused?? * i tryed dividing 0.170 by 2 and times it by 2 ?? what do ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statement "I know that it should be 2k and 1/2x" makes no sense. WHAT should be 2k and 1/2x? And where did you get that "1/2x" from?

You are told that the spring constant is inversely proportional to the number of coils of the spring of the spring. You are also told that attaching an object of weight w (unknown) it stretches by 0.170 m. That means its initial spring constant is k= w/0.170. Since the number of coils is cut in half, and k is inversely proportional to that, the new k is 2w/0.170. The same weight will be stretched a distance w= (2w/0.170)x so that x= 0.170: half the previous stretch. Prehaps that's where you got that 1/2x but that's the result, not another "multiplier".
 
2k and 1/2x ...F= 2k 1/2x in comparison to the 100 coils so that would be for the 50 coils...I am still confused on what to do with the distance
 
Do it step by step. As Halls' showed, first find the k of the original spring (express it in term of the unknown weight w). Then find the new spring constant of the two shorter springs. Then figure out how much each smaller spring stretches when they support the original weight. (Note that both springs attach to the same weight, so how much of that weight must each spring support?)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top