Surface density of stars in a Galaxy

AI Thread Summary
The scale length of a galaxy's disk is defined as the distance over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this discussion, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over 9 kpc, leading to a calculated scale length of 9 kpc. The formula for surface density is σ(r) = σ0e−r/h, where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length. A participant questions the assumption that e equals 10, indicating a potential misunderstanding of mathematical constants. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the relationship between surface density and scale length in galactic structures.
Barbequeman
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The surface density of stars in a galaxy at a radius of 1 kpc from the centre is 100 Msun/pc^2. The surface density at 10 kpc is 10 Msun/pc^2. Assuming that the surface density of stars is given by the exponential law, calculate
(a) The scale length of the disk.
(b) The surface density at the centre of the galaxy.
Relevant Equations
σ(r) = σ0e−r/h
a.)
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc. The surface density of stars at a radius of r from the center of the disk is given by: σ(r) = σ0e−r/h where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length of the disk. We can rearrange this equation to solve for h: h = −r/ln(σ(r)/σ0) plugging in the values from the question, we get: h = −9 kpc/ln(10/100)
h = 9 kpc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Barbequeman said:
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc.
Ummm, back up a second. So you are saying that ##e = 10##?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top