Taylor Series for Showing B_{x}(x+dx)-B_{x}(x) Approximation

AI Thread Summary
To show that B_{x}(x+dx,y,z) - B_{x}(x,y,z) approximates to \(\frac{\partial B_{x}(x,y,z)}{\partial x} dx\) using a Taylor series, the first term of the series is utilized as a tangent approximation. The expression B(x) = B(a) + B'(a)(x-a) is relevant, where B(x+dx) can be derived by evaluating the function at two points and subtracting. The discussion clarifies that the approximation is valid only under specific conditions, emphasizing that it is not a strict proof but an approximation. The final evaluation involves substituting specific coordinates into the Taylor series expansion to derive the desired result. This method effectively illustrates the relationship between the changes in B_x and the partial derivative with respect to x.
retupmoc
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
How do i show that B_{x}(x+dx,y,z)-B_{x}(x,y,z)\approx \frac{\partial B_{x}(x,y,z)}{\partial x} dx
using a Taylor series to the first term. Using a Taylor series does B(x) = B(a) + B'(a)(x-a)? In that case what would B(x+dx) be and how can i obtain the desired result from this? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's all that crazy text? Meant for the notation style thing they have here? I can't read it worth a darn like it is O_o
 
Ye it was a poor attempt at it. Its supposed to be Bx(x+dx,y,z)-Bx(x,y,z)=dBx/dx dxdydz
 
I take it you mean B_x(x+dx,y,z)- B_x(x,y,z)= \frac{\partial B_x}{/partial dx}dxdydz. I also assume that this is the x-component of a 3-vector.

You can't "prove" it- it's not true- except approximately which is what is intended here. The "Taylor series to the first term" is just the tangent approximation to Bx. Yes, at any given (x0, y0, z0) that is B_x(x_0,y_0,z_0)+ \frac{\partial B_0}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0,z_0)*(x- x_0)+ +\frac{\partial B_0}{\partial y}(x_0,y_0,z_0)*(y- y_0)+\frac{\partial B_0}{\partial z}(x_0,y_0,z_0)*(z- z_0).

Now, evaluate that at (x,y,z)= (x0, y0, z0) and at (x,y,z)= (x0+ dx, y0, z0) and subtract.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top