- #71
Drakkith
Mentor
- 23,094
- 7,504
Dave Eagan said:“As space expanded, the universe cooled and matter formed, and then protons and neutrons formed.”
Pardon me, but matter is protons and neutrons . . . and electrons, etc. So what’s this “and then” business? Cart before the horse?
I believe they are using the term matter to mean high-mass exotic particles such as several different types of quarks, mesons, and other particles that have very short lifetimes and decay very quickly. When the universe was very young, it was so hot that these particles were being created and destroyed all the time. One the temperature dropped past a certain critical point they could no longer be created, so the number of existing high-mass particles quickly dropped to essentially zero via decay. Part of this decay process led to the creation of lower-mass particles such as protons, neutrons, and electrons which cannot decay since they have nothing to decay into (assuming the neutrons are bound to the protons. If not, they decay to protons in about fifteen minutes).
Dave Eagan said:Once again, the source of the CMB is recombination? In layman's terms, the CMB is the energy released when atoms are formed from free charged protons and electrons? If so, the energy released from one such event would be identical to the energy released from every such event. So I'm having trouble being excited or surprised by the fact that the CMB is uniform.
If the CMB were purely the result of recombination, then the CMB would be just a few discrete wavelengths corresponding to the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. Instead, the CMB is a broad-spectrum signal between about 0.3 to 630 GHz created by the thermal motion of the plasma at the time of recombination. What recombination did was to suddenly turn the universe transparent to most EM radiation, allowing this thermal radiation to begin traversing the universe instead of being absorbed right after emission.
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/HeatherFriedberg.shtml