The net electric field at point A is 6.7x10^4Nm.

AI Thread Summary
The net electric field at point A is calculated to be 6.7 x 10^4 Nm, derived from the contributions of two negative charges. The electric field from charge 1 is vertical, contributing no x-component, while charge 2 is horizontal, contributing no y-component. The calculations involve using the formula Enet = k(q1/r^2 + q2/r^2), resulting in a total electric field of -6.0 x 10^4 Nm from the charges. It is emphasized that electric fields are vectors and should be added vectorially, leading to the final net electric field calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of considering components when charges are positioned along different axes.
chef99
Messages
75
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Calculate the net electric field at point A.

unnamed.jpg

Homework Equations


Enet(total)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The electric field at point A will due to charge 2 will point towards charge 2 because charge 2 is negative.
The electric field at point A will due to charge 1 will point towards charge 1 because charge 1 is negative.

Enet(total) = Enetx + Enety
Because q1 is vertical, its x-component is 0. Because q2 is horizontal, its y-component is 0. Therefore,

Enet = kq1/r^2 + kq2/r^2

= (9.0x10^9Nm/C)(-6.0x10^-5C) / (3.0m)^2 + (9.0x10^9Nm/C)(-3.0x10^-5 C) / (3.0m)^2
= -60000Nm
= -6.0x10^4Nm
The electric field at point A due to the other charges is -6.0x10^4Nm


I am unsure if this is correct as this is the first time I've done a question when it hasn't been an equilateral triangle, so I don't know if I have the right idea or not. Also, I am unsure if I need to determine the angle of charge A or not. Any help is greatly appreciated.

**I am new to the forum so apologies for any errors in the format of my question.
 

Attachments

  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 761
Physics news on Phys.org
chef99 said:
Enet = kq1/r^2 + kq2/r^2

Do you know that Electric field is a vector, and so you have to add it vectorially?
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Do you know that Electric field is a vector, and so you have to add it vectorially?
I know the field is a vector, but do I still have to do the x- and y-components first if the direction of the two charges fall on the vertical and horizontal axis, as they appear in the diagram? i.e. Would the x-component for q1 not be zero?
 
Q1 will contribute no x component, Q2 will contribute no y component. But You have to Add them like $$ E_{net} ~=~\sqrt{ {E_x}^2+ {E_y}^2 } $$
 
  • Like
Likes chef99
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Q1 will contribute no x component, Q2 will contribute no y component. But You have to Add them like $$ E_{net} ~=~\sqrt{ {E_x}^2+ {E_y}^2 } $$

So Enet = √60000Nm^2 + 30000Nm^2

Enet = 67082
Enet = 6.7 x10^4Nm
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top