- #176
gneill
Mentor
- 20,989
- 2,933
Okay, so that would be a correct value for the Thevenin voltage expressed as a peak value. Just drop the root 2's to make it an rms value. Presumably either result (peak or rms) should be acceptable since the original problem did not specify one or the other. You can leave the √2's in or out for all calculations. It's just a scaling constant. You can always compare a peak value to an rms result that was calculated by others by dividing your peak value by √2.js3 said:Thankyou for your response.
When i say i have left them as peak, i mean that for V1 i have used j415x√2. And for V2 i have used 415x√2.
So using nodal analysis part a) leaves me with Vt = 166√2+j249√2Did i just need to leave the √2 out is my question? Because if that's the problem, my mistake carries over to part b.
Peak vs rms will never affect the phase angle. So if your phase angle doesn't match an accepted result then you're probably in trouble somewhere in your calculations. If your peak value calculations yield a result that isn't the same as what others have found when you convert them to the same scale (peak or rms) then you need to look at your workings.