- #2,521
YoungPhysicist
- 350
- 203
Today I learned about what exactly is a parabola
Hope getting better soon!Jonathan Scott said:Today I learned about gallstone problems. I had been thinking that my long-running acid digestion problems had produced some strangely severe spells of discomfort in the last few weeks, but yesterday's was really bad and I started Googling, and found that the symptoms matched a gallstone attack. I'm beginning to wonder whether other longer term symptoms could also be related to gallstones. I'll try to check it out with my doctor.
Yesterday a parabola, today a circle. May I suggest to investigate cones?Young physicist said:Today I learned what is a circle equation on another thread!
Jonathan Scott said:Today I learned about gallstone problems. I had been thinking that my long-running acid digestion problems had produced some strangely severe spells of discomfort in the last few weeks, but yesterday's was really bad and I started Googling, and found that the symptoms matched a gallstone attack. I'm beginning to wonder whether other longer term symptoms could also be related to gallstones. I'll try to check it out with my doctor.
On my list nowfresh_42 said:Yesterday a parabola, today a circle. May I suggest to investigate cones?
The conics should not be "random stuff" they should be part of a course in mathematics. They are the basis for a huge amount of math.Young physicist said:On my list now
Just like @Greg Bernhardt says, random stuff that we learn everyday
Just don't mistake hyperbolas for hyperboles.fresh_42 said:Yesterday a parabola, today a circle. May I suggest to investigate cones?
Or ellipses from ellipsismfb said:Just don't mistake hyperbolas for hyperboles.
mfb said:Just don't mistake hyperbolas for hyperboles.
That's taking things too far...phinds said:Or ellipses from ellipsis
Yes, I know. I mean “random stuff that show up which are not in your plan) like bumping into circle equation on this forum which is not ,and will not be mentioned in my quadratic function courses.phinds said:The conics should not be "random stuff" they should be part of a course in mathematics. They are the basis for a huge amount of math.
One results from extremising the action; the other from extremising everything.mfb said:Just don't mistake hyperbolas for hyperboles.
Good that you mentioned it: Don't forget the Von Staudt conic!DrGreg said:That's taking things too far...
fresh_42 said:Good that you mentioned it: Don't forget the Von Staudt conic!
A good indication of the level of your intellectual abilities.Drakkith said:I read that as the Von Staudt comic the first time...
phinds said:A good indication of the level of your intellectual abilities.
Finish investigating cones!(Not very deep though), but still a great thing to know beside ordinary courses.fresh_42 said:Yesterday a parabola, today a circle. May I suggest to investigate cones?
jim hardy said:
...And they can be purchased where?OmCheeto said:TIL that tiltmeters can measure tilt to a nanoradian.
Then I learned that a nanoradian is the equivalent of a nickel's thickness difference when viewed from a distance of New York City to San Francisco.
As far as I can tell, they are strictly DIY.Tom.G said:...And they can be purchased where?
On second thought, the price tag probably has too many digits. How about: ...And the plans are available where?
I'm not really sure.jim hardy said:Hmmm. Do they work by gravity, like this one ?
View attachment 230230
Good point! I hadn't even thought about that. Might be something to calculate.Great. Now i'll be worrying about effect on them from planetary alignment and barycenters... please tell me there is none...
mfb said:Superconducting gravimeters levitate a sphere in vacuum and measure the electric current necessary for that. They achieve 10-12 g precision for the local gravitational attraction. They should be able to measure sidewards forces in a similar way. A pendulum interferometer is great if you don't have local seismic noise.
Sub-nanorad tiltmeter with a pendulum
10 picorad resolution for angle measurements (relative to a given reference)
OmCheeto said:Doctor; "No problem. Om is a starfish. Just go out to the bay and collect some seawater. He'll be fine."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4527676/ said:Conclusion
The presence of echinoderm globins related to the vertebrate neuroglobin and cytoglobin lineages suggests that the split between neuroglobins and cytoglobins occurred in the deuterostome ancestor shared by echinoderms and vertebrates.
Not sure why I doubted either you nor Asimov, but I did.jim hardy said:Made me think of a 1957 Asimov essay "The Sea Urchin and We"
wherein he stated the Sea Urchin is the most primitive creature with iron based hemoglobin.
Dont know why that stuck with me. Maybe because i'd recently got stung by one...
Anyhow , Asimov said once Mother Nature gets a chemistry she likes she sticks with it.
This seems to agreeSea Urchins may be our evolutionary "Kissin' Cousins",
,,, but don't try it. .
old jim