Using Xsens MTi-G to Plot Motion in Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Xsens MTi-G to plot motion in a 2D plane by utilizing acceleration and velocity data. Participants explore methods for calculating position and velocity, emphasizing the use of Euler's method for approximating motion over discrete time intervals. The conversation also addresses the integration of acceleration data to derive distance and heading, with a specific inquiry about the orientation of the heading angle relative to north. Advanced calculations involving non-constant acceleration and the use of magnetometer data for determining direction are highlighted. The thread concludes with a clarification on the representation of the heading angle in the coordinate system.
evol_w10lv
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm doing project using xsens MTi-G.
Data file example:
mi51t0la08b2vg6yt.png


I must plot motion in plane (decart coordinate system), without z component.
Measurment is taken after 0.01 s. To do the task, I should use acceleration and velosity data.

Homework Equations



c2f9lb1hu86v8d4netl.png


The Attempt at a Solution



Can I use those equations? I guess they are for constant acceleration. Or am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those equations are for constant acceleration. And looking at the data file you posted part of, it looks like your acceleration is not constant.

Depending on your level of calculus, you have a few ways of proceeding. If your calculus is introductory you could approximate that the acceleration is constant over each measurement interval. Then you can use those equations over each interval. So at time=t1, say the first row in your file, you could have x1, Vx1, and ax1. Then evolve the position forward in time by that one interval using those equations. That will get you from x(t1) to x(t2).

This is essentially Euler's method.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_method

So there are some tricky bits to that. The time you need to use will be the time after time t1. So t1 looks to be 38291.2262 and t2 looks to be 38291.2362. So the t in the equation is the amount of time from t1 to t2, or 0.01 seconds. So you would apply the initial velocity and acceleration for that long.

x(t1) is presumably known.
x(t2) = x(t1) + Vx(t1) * 0.01 + 1/2 ax(t1) * (0.01)^2

And Vx(t1) and ax(t1) are the values from your data. Then you get x(t3) by evolving forward from t2 to t3 using he next time interval. You might do this in a spreadsheet such as MS Excel. Or maybe your "xsens MTi-G" will do it for you.

If your calculus is a bit more advanced then you could deal with the equations for non-constant acceleration. Velocity is the integral of acceleration, and position is the integral of velocity. And you could do some kind of curve-fitting to get the acceleration as a function of time between measurement points. This will presumably be more accurate than the previous method. Possibly your "xsens MTi-G" will do that for you as well.
 
Ok, it's clear about that. But now I'm trying to do more advanced calculations. I want to include heading and distance in my calculations. Let's say I integrate resulting acceleration vector twice to get distace.
resulting_acc = sqrt(accX^2 + acc_Y^2)
To get heading, I use magnetometer data, so direction = atan2(Mag_Y,Mag_X), then I convert it to 0-360 degrees.
Where exactly this heading angle is on the plane?
Is this angle to north like in the picture?
y6zw9jrtacotkt59ryhc.png
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top