A Velocity Verlet for relativistic simulation

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Koeck
  • Start date Start date
Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
I'm simulating a situation that's partly relativistic and I'm wondering if it's wise to use Velocity Verlet.

A fast electron (200 keV or roughly 208 000 000 m/s) travels along the z-axis and intersects a beam of slower electrons (1 keV or roughly 20 000 000 m/s) that are moving along the x-axis.

I treat the slower electrons as non-relativistic.

For the fast electron I assume it's travelling essentially in the z-direction at all times, which is very accurate as far as I can see.
So I use the parallel corrected mass in the z-direction and the orthogonal in x and y to get the acceleration of the fast electron at every time step.

I realise that velocity verlet is not intended for accelerations that are velocity-dependent, but in this case the velocity of the fast electron is almost constant so γ and γ3 are almost constant during the whole simulation.

Does it sound okay to use Velocity Verlet in this case or should I consider a different algorithm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer to your question about the integrator, but you could try working with four-vectors. The four velocity has a constant magnitude by definition and the Lorentz force law relates to it via the four momentum which is the invariant mass times the four velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top