Verifying Energy Conservation with x(t)=Acos(wt+phi)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying energy conservation using the equation x(t) = A cos(wt + phi). Participants explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, suggesting that differentiating x(t) twice can yield acceleration. They discuss integrating force with respect to displacement and mention the kinetic energy formula K(t) = 1/2 m v^2, emphasizing the need for substitutions. One contributor notes that using F = -kx simplifies the problem, leading to a concise solution. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem while acknowledging that established methods in textbooks typically utilize the spring force model.
Lchan1
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using x(t)= A cos(wt+phi) verify that the total energy is conserved.


Homework Equations


V(x)= Integral x to x1 F(x)dx


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought about using the aboved equation but have no idea where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F=ma so you can differentiate x[t] twice for a[t].Integrate F[t]=ma[t] w.r.t dx (you would have to make a substitution for x for that).You would also think K[t]=1/2m*v*v where v=v[t] at general instant t.
Add and you will have a quantity independent of t.
 
I am not sure how to make a substitution for dx.
 
Well dx= vdt. Turns out a pretty lengthy problem after all. Will be happy to help further, if needed.
 
Instead of your approach, I used F=-kx and integrate to get 1/2kx^2

x(t) is given so I have an equation.
w=sqrt (k/m)
so things actaully worked nicely. and It was only a page of work.
 
Well that is how you presented the problem. All textbooks use F=-kx to prove the result.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top