Virial Theorem and Energy of a Two-Body System

AI Thread Summary
In a two-body system of identical particles orbiting their center of mass, the average potential energy is -2 times the average kinetic energy, leading to a negative average total energy. When energy is added to this system, it equilibrates, causing the average kinetic energy to decrease. This decrease occurs because the relationship E = T + V, where V = -2T, implies that an increase in total energy results in a reduction of kinetic energy. Consequently, the temperature of the system, which reflects kinetic energy, also decreases with the addition of energy. This phenomenon is linked to the concept of negative heat capacities in bounded systems.
torq123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I want to make sure I am understanding this correctly.

Say we have two identical particles orbiting (in circles) about their center of mass.

We know that the average potential energy is -2 times the average kinetic energy.

So the average total energy is negative the average kinetic energy.

If we add a bit of energy to this system and wait for it to equilibrate, will the average kinetic energy increase or decrease?

My thought would be that it would decrease, because since the average total energy is negative the average kinetic energy, kinetic energy would have to decrease to make the math work.

Is there a good way to understand this, physically? And did I even reach the right conclusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since E=T+V, and V=-2T, E=-T. Therefor adding energy makes T smaller.
 
That's a correct inference drawn and what u hav mentioned here is unsophisticated definition of Virial theorem...this is put to the explanation of negative heat capacities... for bounded system as mentioned above, an addition to the energy causes a decrease in kinetic energy..and since temperature is nothing but a manifestation of K.E., with the addition of energy the temp. of system decreases as well...
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
393
Back
Top