- #106
Sophia
- 112
- 565
Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA1oldman2 said:View attachment 96235 Using D.P.'s advanced search algorithm (and my snipping tool) I was able to come up with an image of Silicon waffle
Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA1oldman2 said:View attachment 96235 Using D.P.'s advanced search algorithm (and my snipping tool) I was able to come up with an image of Silicon waffle
It's my processor speed, can't get around that one little bottleneckSilicon Waffle said:Come on, already 155. Your information is out-dated! (@ 10:59 AM Texas grandfather clock )
They both "let me go" for humor related issues, I'm a free agent at the moment honing my skills as an unskilled skill seekerSophia said:Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA
unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]1oldman2 said:... an unskilled skill seeker
That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.Silicon Waffle said:unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.1oldman2 said:That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.
I will try and get Mr. S. Waffle on that one as my problem solving skills need to have some problems solved themselves.mfb said:But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.
Wha..wa.. What?Silicon Waffle said:unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
CrazyNinja I'm glad you don't understand either :) I thought I was the only one too stupid to understand a science/math/logic jokeCrazyNinja said:Wha..wa.. What?
Psinter said:This is how I visualize Sophie:
Um, no. That's not Kim Kardashian.CrazyNinja said:You visualise Sophia as Kim Kardashian?
PS: Did you recognise who it is?
Psinter said:Is it someone famous?
Psinter said:Enlighten me, please.
I had no option, but to cheat. It says on the name of the picture Lucy Grande. Is it her? (I'll be honest, I had never heard of her before)CrazyNinja said:Yup yup.
To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she. One of the few people I feel comfortable with on the internet. Besides visualizing the member SW as in the pics, I visualize SW as a very kind, clever, and intelligent person with the best sense of humor in the forum. And that is an honest compliment.CrazyNinja said:@Silicon Waffle is a "she"??! Jesus. My whole life has been a lie.
Is that funny ? You know the differences between 2 programs that have the same functionality but are produced by 2 different companies ? You are the end-user. Due to physical conditions my program can't implement some functions that you prefer.CrazyNinja said:@Silicon Waffle is a "she"??! Jesus. My whole life has been a lie.
Only if you've seen any of the Narnia films.CrazyNinja said:Look carefully. You have seen her before when she was younger.
Ah, no wonder I could not recognize her. I haven't seen them.Jonathan Scott said:Only if you've seen any of the Narnia films.
Silicon Waffle said:Is that funny ? You know the differences between 2 programs that have the same functionality but are produced by 2 different companies ? You are the end-user. Due to physical conditions my program can't implement some functions that you prefer.
And my program is only for those who like to use and clearly have their rights to choose to use. Do you have a choice ? I guess Yes.
Psinter said:To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she.
Oh no... I missed this post of yours.Psinter said:...
To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she. One of the few people I feel comfortable with on the internet. Besides visualizing the member SW as in the pics, I visualize SW as a very kind, clever, and intelligent person with the best sense of humor in the forum. And that is an honest compliment.
*acting like an old wise person who gives kind compliments (but not really wise... or old )*
jim hardy said:Evo must resemble this pretty voyageur
]
Melted?! No! What have I done? We must make it solid again!Silicon Waffle said:Oh no... I missed this post of yours.
My heart has melt like butter on hot muffin right after I read your post.
It sounds so sweet of you to say so about me, thank you Psinter a lot.
You are now on my list!
Well, to me it seems to be the same rubber duck!Psinter said:EDIT: I have such a hard time identifying faces that I could only identify that the picture above and the following are the same person because of the teeth. I swear I could not tell they were the same because of the face, I had to look at the teeth: (plus, in the first one she has a little black dot below her mouth and in the second one it disappeared completely I'm so confused)
No idea, but I don't think it's her.CrazyNinja said:Yup yup.
If it's not Kim Kardshian, then who IS it?
It's a little cute duckling.256bits said:Well, to me it seems to be the same rubber duck!
Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/Silicon Waffle said:A need to visualize your chat-mates may be caused by your own curiosity, your low self-esteem or self-confidence but I think it is also due to your precaution, care or even that you are looking down on them.
@Greg can help!Sophia said:Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/
Déjà vu'. I felt such a strong Déjà vu' regarding this post it was almost creepy. Like from very before you joined the forum. Actually that's not certain, I don't know when you joined the forum. And I won't pay visit to your profile since I don't want to be seen as a stalker. But yeah, Déjà vu' is strong with this one.Sophia said:Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/
And how do you visualize me?Silicon Waffle said:A need to visualize your chat-mates may be caused by your own curiosity, your low self-esteem or self-confidence but I think it is also due to your precaution, care or even that you are looking down on them.
That's strange.Psinter said:Déjà vu'. I felt such a strong Déjà vu' regarding this post it was almost creepy. Like from very before you joined the forum. Actually that's not certain, I don't know when you joined the forum. And I won't pay visit to your profile since I don't want to be seen as a stalker. But yeah, Déjà vu' is strong with this one.
Ah well, you joined way way before the traces of this Déjà vu' (I thought you joined this year). This Déjà vu' traced back to last year about October. (And I wasn't visiting the forum by then)Sophia said:That's strange.
I joined the forum like 2 years ago? But I only asked one question and left . I've become active on Halloween last year :-)
Now what do you think about that?
You're not getting crazy, this happens. You're just tired.Psinter said:Ah well, you joined way way before the traces of this Déjà vu' (I thought you joined this year). This Déjà vu' traced back to last year about October. (And I wasn't visiting the forum by then)
Weird stuff. I must be becoming crazy. [emoji2]