Visualizing PF Members: Avatars, Names, and Identities

  • Thread starter CrazyNinja
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Members
In summary: Kitten : ^ I like her. ^ 4) @Loki : He seems... well, Loki. 5) @Nyx : I don't know, she just seems... strange. 6) @Pixalate : She seems nice enough.In summary, Drakkith has already initiated a post on this, but I wanted to ask this again:How do you visualise a PF member when you interact with them? Do you see them as their avatars? What if they don't have one? Do you visualise them by their names? What if their names and av
  • #106
1oldman2 said:
View attachment 96235 Using D.P.'s advanced search algorithm (and my snipping tool) I was able to come up with an image of Silicon waffle :smile:
Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA :DD
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle and 1oldman2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
Silicon Waffle said:
Come on, already 155. Your information is out-dated! :biggrin: (@ 10:59 AM Texas grandfather clock )
It's my processor speed, can't get around that one little bottleneck :frown:
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #108
Sophia said:
Wow! with such skills, I'm sure you work for FBI or CIA :DD
They both "let me go" for humor related issues, I'm a free agent at the moment honing my skills as an unskilled skill seeker :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #109
1oldman2 said:
... an unskilled skill seeker :smile:
unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #110
Silicon Waffle said:
unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.:wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #111
1oldman2 said:
That could almost be the basis for an entirely new thread.:wink:
But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz, Silicon Waffle and 1oldman2
  • #112
mfb said:
But then its components would have to be independent, and span the whole thread.
I will try and get Mr. S. Waffle on that one as my problem solving skills need to have some problems solved themselves.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja and Silicon Waffle
  • #113
Silicon Waffle said:
unskilled=[itex]\bar{P}[/itex]
skill=[itex]{P}[/itex]
seeker=[itex]{S}[/itex]
So, [itex]{S}[/itex] is part of [itex]{P}[/itex] which is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] or [itex]{SP}[/itex] is negated by [itex]\bar{P}[/itex]. That means [itex]\bar{P}[/itex] turns down [itex]{S}[/itex].
Wha..wa.. What?
 
  • #114
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #115
CrazyNinja said:
Wha..wa.. What?
CrazyNinja I'm glad you don't understand either :) I thought I was the only one too stupid to understand a science/math/logic joke :nb)
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja and OmCheeto
  • #116
This is how I visualize Sophie:
http://cdn.themetapicture.com/pic/images/2015/03/07/cute-girl-goat-selfie-smiling.jpg

And this is how I visualize Silicon Waffle: (be aware that it wasn't until the other day that I realized SW was a 'she'. This whole time I thought she was a 'he', but like I said in my first post it is because I don't really pay attention to genders on the internet, I just want to talk.)
girl-duckling-selfie-scream-ahhh-14290404673.jpg

EDIT: I have such a hard time identifying faces that I could only identify that the picture above and the following are the same person because of the teeth. I swear I could not tell they were the same because of the face, I had to look at the teeth: (plus, in the first one she has a little black dot below her mouth and in the second one it disappeared completely :confused: I'm so confused)
cute-girl-duck-face-selfie.jpg

Girls can have many faces according to how they do their hair and it confuses me so hard. :confused: A girl can tell me: "I can avoid being seen if I wish..."
-Aragorn

And I would believe her.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Sophia and CrazyNinja
  • #117
  • Like
Likes Tsu
  • #118
Psinter said:
This is how I visualize Sophie:

You visualise Sophia as Kim Kardashian? :nb):nb)

Here is how I see @Sophia

lucy-grande.jpg


PS: Did you recognise who it is?
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #119
CrazyNinja said:
You visualise Sophia as Kim Kardashian? :nb):nb)
PS: Did you recognise who it is?
Um, no. That's not Kim Kardashian.

Nope, no idea who that is. I cannot recognize. Is it someone famous? :oldconfused: Enlighten me, please.
 
  • #120
Psinter said:
Is it someone famous?

Yup yup.

If it's not Kim Kardshian, then who IS it?
 
Last edited:
  • #121
Psinter said:
Enlighten me, please.

Look carefully. You have seen her before when she was younger.
 
  • #122
CrazyNinja said:
Yup yup.
I had no option, but to cheat. :-p It says on the name of the picture Lucy Grande. :biggrin: Is it her? (I'll be honest, I had never heard of her before) :nb)
CrazyNinja said:
@Silicon Waffle is a "she"??! Jesus. My whole life has been a lie.
To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she. :smile: One of the few people I feel comfortable with on the internet. Besides visualizing the member SW as in the pics, I visualize SW as a very kind, clever, and intelligent person with the best sense of humor in the forum. And that is an honest compliment.

*acting like an old wise person who gives kind compliments (but not really wise... or old :-p)*
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #123
CrazyNinja said:
@Silicon Waffle is a "she"??! Jesus. My whole life has been a lie.
Is that funny ? You know the differences between 2 programs that have the same functionality but are produced by 2 different companies ? You are the end-user. Due to physical conditions my program can't implement some functions that you prefer.
And my program is only for those who like to use and clearly have their rights to choose to use. Do you have a choice ? I guess Yes. :-p
 
  • #124
CrazyNinja said:
Look carefully. You have seen her before when she was younger.
Only if you've seen any of the Narnia films.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja and Psinter
  • #125
Jonathan Scott said:
Only if you've seen any of the Narnia films.
Ah, no wonder I could not recognize her. I haven't seen them. :smile:
 
  • #126
Silicon Waffle said:
Is that funny ? You know the differences between 2 programs that have the same functionality but are produced by 2 different companies ? You are the end-user. Due to physical conditions my program can't implement some functions that you prefer.
And my program is only for those who like to use and clearly have their rights to choose to use. Do you have a choice ? I guess Yes. :-p

I managed to understand something on the second try reading this. On the third one, even that disappeared.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #127
Psinter said:
To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she.

True that.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #128
Psinter said:
...

To me it matters little. I like Silicon Waffle be it a he or a she. :smile: One of the few people I feel comfortable with on the internet. Besides visualizing the member SW as in the pics, I visualize SW as a very kind, clever, and intelligent person with the best sense of humor in the forum. And that is an honest compliment.

*acting like an old wise person who gives kind compliments (but not really wise... or old :-p)*
Oh no... I missed this post of yours.
My heart has melt like butter on hot muffin right after I read your post.
It sounds so sweet of you to say so about me, thank you Psinter a lot.

You are now on my list! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja and Psinter
  • #129
]

jim hardy said:
Evo must resemble this pretty voyageur
350px-John_William_Waterhouse_-_The_Lady_of_Shalott_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg


]

There she weaves by night and day
A magic web with colours gay.
She has heard a whisper say,
A curse is on her if she stay
To look down to Camelot.
She knows not what the curse may be,
And so she weaveth steadily,
And little other care hath she,
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
  • #130
Silicon Waffle said:
Oh no... I missed this post of yours.
My heart has melt like butter on hot muffin right after I read your post.
It sounds so sweet of you to say so about me, thank you Psinter a lot.

You are now on my list! :biggrin:
Melted?! No! What have I done? :nb) We must make it solid again! :hurt:

Cheers. :smile:
 
  • #131
Psinter said:
EDIT: I have such a hard time identifying faces that I could only identify that the picture above and the following are the same person because of the teeth. I swear I could not tell they were the same because of the face, I had to look at the teeth: (plus, in the first one she has a little black dot below her mouth and in the second one it disappeared completely :confused: I'm so confused)
Well, to me it seems to be the same rubber duck!
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #132
CrazyNinja said:
Yup yup.

If it's not Kim Kardshian, then who IS it?
No idea, but I don't think it's her.
256bits said:
Well, to me it seems to be the same rubber duck!
It's a little cute duckling. :oldshy: :blushing:
 
  • #133
A need to visualize your chat-mates may be caused by your own curiosity, your low self-esteem or self-confidence but I think it is also due to your precaution, care or even that you are looking down on them. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • #134
Silicon Waffle said:
A need to visualize your chat-mates may be caused by your own curiosity, your low self-esteem or self-confidence but I think it is also due to your precaution, care or even that you are looking down on them. :oldbiggrin:
Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #135
Sophia said:
Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/
@Greg can help! :biggrin:
 
  • #136
Sophia said:
Or maybe it's evolutionary. For millions of years, our ancestors and homo sapiens saw who they were communicating with. We need to see faces. It's the same as in that phenomenon where you see faces in objects like on a piece of toast :-) I wanted to add some funny pictures to demonstrate but don't know how to do it on a phone :-/
Déjà vu'. I felt such a strong Déjà vu' regarding this post it was almost creepy. Like from very before you joined the forum. Actually that's not certain, I don't know when you joined the forum. And I won't pay visit to your profile since I don't want to be seen as a stalker. But yeah, Déjà vu' is strong with this one.
 
  • #137
Silicon Waffle said:
A need to visualize your chat-mates may be caused by your own curiosity, your low self-esteem or self-confidence but I think it is also due to your precaution, care or even that you are looking down on them. :oldbiggrin:
And how do you visualize me?

I have a feeling I'm going to regret this question... :nb) I'm not really sure I want an answer.
 
  • #138
Psinter said:
Déjà vu'. I felt such a strong Déjà vu' regarding this post it was almost creepy. Like from very before you joined the forum. Actually that's not certain, I don't know when you joined the forum. And I won't pay visit to your profile since I don't want to be seen as a stalker. But yeah, Déjà vu' is strong with this one.
That's strange.
I joined the forum like 2 years ago? But I only asked one question and left . I've become active on Halloween last year :-)
Now what do you think about that?
 
  • #139
Sophia said:
That's strange.
I joined the forum like 2 years ago? But I only asked one question and left . I've become active on Halloween last year :-)
Now what do you think about that?
Ah well, you joined way way before the traces of this Déjà vu' (I thought you joined this year). This Déjà vu' traced back to last year about October. (And I wasn't visiting the forum by then)

Weird stuff. :bugeye: I must be becoming crazy. o0) :smile:
 
  • #140
Psinter said:
Ah well, you joined way way before the traces of this Déjà vu' (I thought you joined this year). This Déjà vu' traced back to last year about October. (And I wasn't visiting the forum by then)

Weird stuff. :bugeye: I must be becoming crazy. o0) [emoji2]
You're not getting crazy, this happens. You're just tired.
 
  • Like
Likes Psinter

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
16K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top