Was gravitational length contraction predicted by general theory of relativity ?

Click For Summary
Gravitational length contraction is indeed predicted by the general theory of relativity, specifically noting that a rod appears shortened when aligned with a gravitational field's radius. However, the gravitational field does not affect the length of a rod positioned tangentially. This phenomenon highlights the complexities of measuring distances in varying gravitational contexts. Additionally, gravitational time dilation is emphasized as a more practical consequence of general relativity. Overall, the discussion underscores the nuanced effects of gravity on measurements in space-time.
manvirsingh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have read somewhere about the phenomenon called gravitational length contraction.Was gravitational length contraction predicted by general theory of relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to define how you are measuring the length of a distant object.
 
manvirsingh said:
I have read somewhere about the phenomenon called gravitational length contraction.Was gravitational length contraction predicted by general theory of relativity?
Yes, and you can read it here (English translation p.196-197:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060829045130/http://www.Alberteinstein.info/gallery/gtext3.html

In particular he concludes there:

- that the "rod thus appears a little shortened [..] by the presence of the gravitational field, if the rod is laid along a radius", and
- that "the gravitational field [..] has no influence on the length of a rod" in the tangential position.

PS: of more practical use was his prediction of gravitational time dilation, which he explains next.

Harald
 
Last edited:
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
957
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
704
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K