Weird News Compilation

  • News
  • Thread starter Evo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    News Weird
In summary, a man who used to be a Fox News guest analyst and claimed to be a CIA agent was sentenced to 33 months in prison for lying about his security clearance, criminal history, and finances.
  • #1,751
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,752
Who is more crackpotty, the crackpot or the one who listens to them?

This is a reactionless drive. It is crackpottery.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Haha
Likes Astranut, berkeman, phinds and 1 other person
  • #1,753
Nugatory said:
Who is more crackpotty, the crackpot or the one who listens to them?

This is a reactionless drive. It is crackpottery.
Fair enough, I have never heard of it.
 
  • #1,755
berkeman said:
Then you haven't been reading the PF rules very closely... :wink:
Oops. Ok apologies.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #1,756
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes phinds, mfb, nsaspook and 3 others
  • #1,757
Hornbein said:

Essentially some guy serendipitously discovered a new phenomenon, which was then developed into an art form by this other guy.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #1,758
If there is a way to make a diode to isolate inputs then it should be possible to make logic gates out of it. Getting the timing of all signals right will be a challenge as we rely on signals that always move.

Make time steps of half the refractory period. Define an on ->off sequence as 1 and an off -> on sequence as 0.
Send a signal into a T-junction followed by a fixed flame in the following time step.
Input 1: on -> off is converted to on -> off -> on
Input 0: off -> on is converted to off -> on -> off
Pick up the second and third time step and we inverted the signal: We made NOT.

OR is a simple T junction. If either signal starts with "on" then we get on->off, otherwise we get off->on.

OR and NOT can be combined to make all other logic gates.
I just don't know how to build diodes.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #1,761
nsaspook said:

Today's APOD has another view of this.

EtnaRingsMoonCrop_Giannobile_960.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes nsaspook, berkeman and collinsmark
  • #1,762
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes phinds, BillTre, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,763
Bangkok housecat survives being devoured by a python.

 
  • Wow
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes phinds, Astronuc, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,764
Hornbein said:
He means making a diode out of lighter fluid. Flames pass through in only one direction.
Oh, OK.
Just throw'n stuff against the wall here to see if anything sticks. :oldwink:

How about a tapered constriction, somwewhat like a funnel, in the pathway (groove)?
 
  • #1,766
 
  • Wow
Likes BillTre
  • #1,767
A marine chopper transports a plane on a sling, refueling mid air on the way

 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes OmCheeto, nsaspook, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #1,768
Very surprised at the conclusion of this study.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-05-gender-difference-perception-ambient-room.html

I only have my humble anecdotal evidence to present but that spans over 30s years in different working environments with women.

My conclusion? They (the gentle sex) feel the cold more, they feel the heat more.

Only last year I posted on pf about trying to convince my office full of women that opening a window would make matters worse not better during our 90F heatwave.

Sure I felt it in the afternoon, but from 8am to about 11am it was not so bad, certainly no reason to open every single window they could as soon as they walked in!

Today was a great example, showing a young colleague (23 female) around the building where all the fire extinguishers were located.

Twenty seconds leaving the office she was shivering, I thought she was ill! 17C in Oldham UK today.

Remember this debate?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-03121-1

https://www.wired.com/2015/08/men-women-battle-office-thermostat/

Some scientific explanations.
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/health/i-am-woman-why-am-i-always-so-cold
 
  • #1,769
Trolling the trolls.

Tiffany Haddish started tracking down her online trolls and calling them on the phone
Haddish told the Los Angeles Times that she created a fake Instagram account under the alter ego “Sarah” in order to combat the online hate she was receiving and to “destroy” the trolls by gathering details from their personal life.

“I’ve learned how to find people’s information — like I pull up the credit report, police records. You can do that for $1.99,” Haddish said. “Sometimes, I get so mad that I’ll get they phone number and I’ll just call them.”

“Oh, I have called people, honey,” Haddish continued. “They be shocked that I called. They’ll be like, ‘I can’t believe you even saw that.’ You did a whole video, jerk! You made a full, five-minute video!
:oldlaugh:
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre
  • #1,770
Borg said:
I'm not really impressed by bullied people becoming bullies themselves, but the article had another unrelated interesting fact:
The “Girls Trip” favorite said that online bullying got so negative over the last year (with commenters calling her “pedo” and “not funny,” for instance) that she hired a digital forensics analyst when death threats starting coming her way. The analyst’s research showed that 75% of these threats were “created by robots in Malaysia and Iran.”
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #1,771
jack action said:
I'm not really impressed by bullied people becoming bullies themselves, but the article had another unrelated interesting fact:
I mostly agree such that I wouldn't want it to become a trend. At least she wasn't doxxing them like some are inclined to do. Too many people feel free to behave as badly as they like when they think that nobody sees them or knows who they are. Getting some of them to personally feel the shame of their own actions isn't the worst thing that I can think of.

Yeah, I saw that bit of info on the threatbots. Pretty scary.
 
  • #1,772
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes OmCheeto
  • #1,773
Not so easy, is it?

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/style/bumble-dating-apps.html said:

Women on Bumble No Longer Have to Make the First Move​

[...]

The shift is a major one for Bumble. Until now, a man who matched with a woman on the app had to wait for her to message him. If she did not initiate a conversation, the match would expire after 24 hours.

[...]

But over the years, Bumble received feedback from women who found that making the first move was “a lot of work” or “a burden,” [...]
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/article/2024/may/04/a-lot-of-effort-to-get-one-date-bumble-app-makes-womens-first-move-easier said:
“In the end it was the data that killed me,” says Penny* about her decision to leave the dating app Bumble. If she opened the app she might receive 100 likes, 25% of which she might be interested in. She would look at their profiles and write individualised messages; a few would respond, perhaps one would result in a date.

“That’s a lot of effort to get one date,” she says. “It’s exhausting.”

Bumble, billed as the feminist Tinder when it launched in 2014, this week announced it was taking action to relieve the administrative burden on its female users. It has given them the option of firing off a short pre-written question to potential dates, rather than a carefully crafted missive, after 70% of its female users said they were becoming burnt out.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #1,774
jack action said:
The analyst’s research showed that 75% of these threats were “created by robots in Malaysia and Iran.”
Hire a Malaysian robot to send out death threats. This modern world....
 
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G
  • #1,776
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes BillTre and phinds
  • #1,778
Borg said:
I didn't even have to watch the video to know what Khan scene that was. :oldlaugh:
I know!

For the past several days I've been anticipating late night talk show monologues (e.g. Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, etc.) to make reference to this Wrath of Kahn scene. But alas, no.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #1,779
If only Ricardo Montalbán was still around to control him. I would pay good money to see that movie.
 
  • Love
Likes nsaspook
  • #1,780
A bit of weird trivia about this (this is the Weird News thread, so it's almost on topic):

Chekov wasn't a character in Star Trek's first season. The episode Space Seed, where the Enterprise first meets up with Kahn, was in the first season.

So Chekov shouldn't have ever met Kahn. Yet in the movie, the implication was that Chekov was part of the crew during that incident. So there's a bit of an inconsistency there.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes nsaspook, BillTre and Borg
  • #1,781
collinsmark said:
So Chekov shouldn't have ever met Kahn. Yet in the movie, the implication was that Chekov was part of the crew during that incident. So there's a bit of an inconsistency there.
Walter Koenig apparently joked that his personal theory was that they met offscreen during Space Seed. Chekhov was using a toilet that Khan needed to use, and the whole creature in the ear thing was revenge for making him wait.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes OmCheeto, nsaspook, Borg and 2 others
  • #1,782
Ibix said:
Walter Koenig apparently joked that his personal theory was that they met offscreen during Space Seed. Chekhov was using a toilet that Khan needed to use, and the whole creature in the ear thing was revenge for making him wait.
The AI 50's version.


 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,784
A case of someone making an astute choice? :oldsurprised:
 
  • #1,785
Maybe they were friends. "Why don't you come over and crash at my place?"
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes berkeman, phinds and Hornbein

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
10K
Replies
62
Views
11K
Replies
24
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
70
Views
12K
Back
Top