- #36
Jimmy Snyder
- 1,127
- 21
It's a question of commitment because marriage is an institution. So if you get married, you should be committed to an institution.
Cyrus said:Marriage is a legal contract. The end.
And its a way to make lots of money for the church.
However, there is absolutely no point to it.
Danger said:One thing for sure, I would absolutely never get married an anything but a civil rite with a Justice of the Peace or Judge presiding. Any hint of religion would make it meaningless.
Oh I dunno; weapons - shotgun - weddings. I can see the linkDanger said:I think that we just set a new standard for thread hijacks.
Kind of, sort of . . . .jimmysnyder said:It's a question of commitment because marriage is an institution. So if you get married, you should be committed to an institution.
lisab said:When I was young, I used to think I'd never marry or have kids. When I met a guy who wanted those things, I thought, well why not?
A very nice thing happened when I married. I began to feel very rooted, in a way I never felt with just boyfriends. When I look far, far, far into the future, there's a lot I don't know, but I do know who will be with me.
Oh. I was just looking for an excuse to say "you should be committed to an institution."Astronuc said:Marriage is about making a promise (commitment), then doing one's best to maintain and fulfill that promise commitment.
In one sense (structurally), marriage or even family could be considered an institution, but then that seems a cold technical approach. But a marriage is more than an institution if we look at the profound relationship between the two individuals in what is supposed to be the most intimate relationship between two human beings.
Astronuc said:Marriage is about making a promise (commitment), then doing one's best to maintain and fulfill that promise commitment.
In one sense (structurally), marriage or even family could be considered an institution, but then that seems a cold technical approach. But a marriage is more than an institution if we look at the profound relationship between the two individuals in what is supposed to be the most intimate relationship between two human beings.
JasonRox said:You're assuming that this intimated relationship can only be achieved through marriage and that marriage is the most intimate relationship between two human beings.
JasonRox said:You're assuming that this intimated relationship can only be achieved through marriage and that marriage is the most intimate relationship between two human beings.
lisab said:...there are probably a lot more instances where a married person has responsibilities that an unmarried one doesn't have.
JasonRox said:That's my issue. Like you said, you have responsibilities. The unmarried person would not need legal obligations, or need to be responsible to do things for their partner, they would do it because of their strong intimated relationship and NOT because they're married and have to.
JasonRox said:That's my issue. Like you said, you have responsibilities. The unmarried person would not need legal obligations, or need to be responsible to do things for their partner, they would do it because of their strong intimated relationship and NOT because they're married and have to.
Marriage IS the most intimate relationship between two human beings, or it should be, in terms of knowing the other person. Of course, we must acknowledge that at least 50% of marriages fail (at least in the US) because at least one party is not committed to the relationship.JasonRox said:You're assuming that this intimated relationship can only be achieved through marriage and that marriage is the most intimate relationship between two human beings.
I agree, but I don't even think of our wedding as the "start" of our marriage. We had been together for over a year before that point. The marriage was just an excuse to invite all our friends to a big party that our parents were overjoyed to pay for.Laura1013 said:I think some people here are confusing the wedding with the marriage. The wedding is simply the start of the marriage, and not so important in the long run. The marriage is everything afterwards.
P4PPY said:I think marriage is great for people who are over 50. As for me... I enjoying playing too much :)
Chi Meson said:I agree, but I don't even think of our wedding as the "start" of our marriage. We had been together for over a year before that point. The marriage was just an excuse to invite all our friends to a big party that our parents were overjoyed to pay for.
Astronuc said:I've been with the same woman for 27 years, and she has been my one and only intimate partner my whole life.
Astronuc said:I 'married' my wife the first time I slept with her (using a common euphemism), because by the standards I impose upon myself, I became bound to her for a lifetime (as long as both of us shall live).
tgt said:Was she the first and only person you have slept with?
Did you marry her then sleep with her or vice versa? And why?
Common indeed.Astronuc said:I 'married' my wife the first time I slept with her (using a common euphemism).
lisab said:Unless you take legal steps to give your partner the powers that marriage automatically grants, you won't be able to take on those responsibilities, even if you really want to, no matter how strong and intimate your relationship is.
And if you do take those legal steps...well, a rose by any other name, is still a rose...
Laura1013 said:Maybe responsibility isn't the right word – privilege? Unmarried, unrelated people do not have the legal authority to make those decisions (in the U.S.), unless they are appointed Power of Attorney.
P4PPY said:I have a 6 year old daughter, and I'm a single parent.
As soon as Samantha was born... I got fixed :)
I plan on raising her with a realist perspective.
She says, "HEY!" by the way.