What are you reading now? (STEM only)

  • Other
  • Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Reading
  • Featured
In summary, D. J. Tritton's "Physical Fluid Dynamics" is a book that he likes for its structure, beginning with phenomenology before delving into the equations. He also likes the book for its inclusion of experimental results throughout. He recently read J. MacCormick's "Nine Algorithms That Changed the Future" and found it to be very readable. Lastly, he is reading S. Weinberg's "Gravitation and Kosmologie" and Zee's "Gravitation".
  • #456
berkeman said:
Two words -- "Spiderman underwear". Worked for berkeboy. :smile:
I accept that toilette training is a STEM topic, but spiderman underwear sounds like a personal theory. :-p
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes jasonRF and Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #457
I only have the one experiment to support my position, but it was very successful. :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes Mondayman
  • #458
caz said:
I accept that toilette training is a STEM topic
I would propose to extend STEM into STEMP, where P stands for psychology. One of the reasons is that we are in the phase when challenges to beat the pandemic or global warming have more to do with psychology than with medicine or environmental science.
 
  • Like
Likes Mondayman, jasonRF and vanhees71
  • #459
Looking at a growing group of anti-corona measures and -vaccination propagandists in Germany, I'd suggest that P stands even for psychiatry, but that's indeed off-topic.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist, Mondayman and weirdoguy
  • #460
vanhees71 said:
Looking at a growing group of anti-corona measures and -vaccination propagandists in Germany, I'd suggest that P stands even for psychiatry, but that's indeed off-topic.
From the way you put it, I'm note sure whether you support measures and vaccine or are against them. But to put it on topic, a psychology book everyone should read is
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0374533555/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, Frimus and Frabjous
  • #461
Of course I'm decidedly pro vaccination and also pro anti-corona measures!
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #462
vanhees71 said:
also pro anti-corona measures
Given that this is a physics forum, this sounds like you are against the sun. :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes diogenesNY, jasonRF, Mondayman and 4 others
  • #463
caz said:
this sounds like you are against the sun.
But only superficially.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Frabjous and vanhees71
  • #464
I am revising classical mechanics from kleppner and kolenkow. Studying ODE's from Ross differential equations. Going through hubbard and hubbard in my free time. Studying organic chemistry (just started) from LG WADE. Trying to give some time for OXTOBY introduction to modern chemistry.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #465
vanhees71 said:
Looking at a growing group of anti-corona measures and -vaccination propagandists in Germany, I'd suggest that P stands even for psychiatry, but that's indeed off-topic.
I think it is growing not only in Germany. I am not sure what is my favorite argument given from them, if it is "to take vaccine will make you to turn gay" or "the implantation of devil chip in our bodies". I think the last one is a little old, not so funny anymore, so my favorite now is to take vaccine make you gay
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Falgun, Mr.Husky, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #466
Be warned about Purcell.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr.Husky and vanhees71
  • #469
dextercioby said:
Well, they are from this year. By Amazon TOC they do not seem bad. But again, we need to let some months pass, to get unbiased/unpaid opinions. Anyways, in case they turn good, thanks for suggestions.
The topic of stochastic forces, I guess it's covered in Langevin equation.
Most topics look like they can be found in other books.
 
  • #470
Peskin & schroeder's Introduction to Quantum Field Theory for the problems. Matthew Schwartz's Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model & Srednicki. Supplementing that with Gauge Fields and Strings by Polyakov.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, Demystifier and Hamiltonian
  • #471
Reviewing undergraduate courses in preparation for an MS program in Mathematics.

Anton: Elementary Linear Algebra
Abbot: Understanding Analysis
Apostol Calculus 1.

Should be done with Anton in a month. Then proceed to my worn out of copy of Axler: Linear Algebra Done Right.

Then Artin Algebra, and one of my many other Analysis books.
 
  • #472
Mr.Husky said:
I am revising classical mechanics from kleppner and kolenkow. Studying ODE's from Ross differential equations. Going through hubbard and hubbard in my free time. Studying organic chemistry (just started) from LG WADE. Trying to give some time for OXTOBY introduction to modern chemistry.
How do you like Ross Differential Equations? It is actually one of my favorite books. If you like Ross, and want to learn PDE, then there is a similar book. I forget the author but the cover is blue, and the professor worked at a university located in Honolulu? He was the guy that set fire to his office lol.
 
  • #473
Wonder if it's not too far OT to ask here when it's worth buying a book , given most of its content ( excepting cutting edge areas) is available for free somewhere on the web. I guess books do provide structure to the material that you can't find otherwise, but one may still be able to do well without it by providing your own structure.
 
  • #476
Borg said:
Trying to get a better handle on Graph Neural Networks. This seems to be a pretty good article for working up from the basics so far - https://distill.pub/2021/gnn-intro/#other-types-of-graphs-multigraphs-hypergraphs-hypernodes
That paper looks good to me ##-## for further exploration, I suggest:

9780521288811_l.jpg


##-## available from https://www.alibris.com/search/books/isbn/9780521288811 (used and in good condition) for ##$7.27 + $5.00 \rm{~shipping}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #477
Reading through Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by DJ Griffiths and learning how little I retained from my undergrad...:confused:
 
  • #478
more literature than stem, but a fascinating book and a great break from the gee-whiz bullshit that constitutes most science writing, this book is a dark, semifictionalized account of selceted scientific and mathematical discoveries and both the benefits and the costs extracted from the discoverers and the world at large - beginning with the leap from the first synthetic pigment, Prussian Blue to its link with the discovery and history of cyanide, then circles back to Fritz Haber, at once the architect of chemical warfare, the man to whom a majority of the people living today owe their existence and well being, and the inventor of the gas that the Nazis used to exterminated his family after he died.

51pQZbsuBqL._SX336_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Frabjous
  • #479
Until the end of time by Brian Greene, although it doesn't have any equations, the explanations of thermodynamics are crystal clear
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • #480
One thing that I am reading right now is _Stronger Than a Hundred Men: A History of the Vertical Water Wheel_
by Terry S. Reynolds, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983

Very interesting. Only a little way in, and so far reading a very deeply researched and cited exploration of the origination and precursors of the vertical waterwheel (which seems to have emerged in the first or second century BC). Documentary descriptions are scarce and epigraphical evidence dates only from much later, but there are meaningful pieces to put together, albeit requiring some logical speculation.

A revolutionary way to extract work from the natural world.

--diogenesNY
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and vanhees71
  • #481
B. Zwiebach, Mastering Quantum Mechanics (2022)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/026204613X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

New excellent QM textbook, very pedagogic, suitable for beginners, yet very complete (about 1100 pages long) and containing many modern topics which other textbooks rarely discuss.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes weirdoguy, Hamiltonian, haushofer and 3 others
  • #483
  • Like
Likes haushofer, Demystifier, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #484
Only 3 chapters worth a read: 18, 22, 23.
 
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71
  • #485
dextercioby said:
Only 3 chapters worth a read: 18, 22, 23.
Provided that you already know everything else. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #486
haushofer said:
Can you give some examples of such topics?
See post #484 by @dextercioby.
 
  • Like
Likes haushofer
  • #487
I guess I'll buy it; his string theory book was remarkable.

I once took a course on Double Field Theory from him; he's also an excellent teacher, and was really interested in our research topics.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, Demystifier and vanhees71
  • #488
Quote from the book:

2.4 Photoelectric Effect
In this and in the following section, we will discuss some foundational experiments relating to
photons. e first is the photoelectric effect. The second is Compton scattering. Together, these two
experiments convinced physicists that photons are quanta of light.
Really? :-(((

Historically that may be right, but neither the PE nor Compton scattering prove the necessity for quantization of the em. field. This is really well-known now. Why do textbook writers, particularly of QM intro textbooks, always just copy the mistakes from the tradition?

Besides, where are the postulates clearly stated?
 
  • Like
Likes physicsworks, fluidistic and dextercioby
  • #489
vanhees71 said:
Quote from the book:Really? :-(((

Historically that may be right, but neither the PE nor Compton scattering prove the necessity for quantization of the em. field. This is really well-known now. Why do textbook writers, particularly of QM intro textbooks, always just copy the mistakes from the tradition?

Besides, where are the postulates clearly stated?

I know about the photoelectric effect using classical waves in the Schrödinger equations. but I'm unaware of a wavy explanation of the Compton scattering
 
  • #490
It's a classical em. wave scattering on an electron (described quantum mechanically with the Dirac equation), i.e., in semiclassical approximation. That's how Klein and Nishina explained the Compton effect quantum mechanically for the first time.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01366453 (it's, however in German ;-)).
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
642
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
626
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
243
Views
51K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top