What Forces Influence the Energy Required to Peel Tape?

AI Thread Summary
Peeling tape involves complex interactions of adhesive forces, primarily influenced by Van der Waals forces and chemical adhesion. The energy transformation when peeling tape includes potential strain energy and possibly some heat energy from breaking adhesive bonds. Contrary to initial assumptions, increasing the peeling angle does not necessarily make it easier to remove the tape, suggesting a more intricate relationship between adhesion and peeling dynamics. The compression line observed when peeling tape indicates that the mechanics of adhesion are not straightforward and can lead to unexpected results. Understanding these principles can enhance insights into adhesive behavior and the physics of tape.
jangheej
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have a question about force needed to peel a tape.

1. If an external force does work on a tape, to what kind of energy is it transformed?
There must be some kind of energy stored in the tape, but I can't think of any.
some papers mention "strain energy", but I don't grasp the concept of it.

2. Where does the adhesive force come from? Is it from Van der waals force?

3. I drew the forces in the attached file, and accordingly, since the vertical component of the external force increases as the theta increases, it must be easier to peel the tape off the surface when the angle increases. But theories and simple experiments show the opposite result. What is wrong with the picture?
 

Attachments

  • force.jpg
    force.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 520
Physics news on Phys.org
I may be going a bit out on a limb here, but

1) I imagine there could be small amounts of heat energy released by destroying adhesive bonds

2) It depends on the type of adhesion, for chemical/electrostatic adhesion, I don't think it would be, but I think Van der Waals forces play a small role any time there is an adhesive force between two objects. For something like tape, this role is small compared to the chemical adhesive.

3) I just think the system is a bit more complex that that, I would suggest looking at the point where the tape where the peeling is occurring between the tape and the surface. The angle between the peeled tape and tape stuck to the surface is not perfectly sharp, but rounded. That could have something to do with it.

Hope that helped.
 
jangheej said:
I have a question about force needed to peel a tape.

Peeling tape off a surface is a surprisingly enormously complicated problem. First, adhesion is not that well understood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhesion

Van der Waals forces are often put forward as an explanation, but that's only because Van der Waals forces are a blanket term to describe all intermolecular forces other than electrostatic/electromagnetic ones- that is, it's a catch-all term for 'we don't know the details'.

Here's a simple trick you can do that will thoroughly confuse you-

loosely lay a piece of tape onto a flat surface. A short distance from one end, use your fingernail to press a thin stripe of tape into contact with the surface, creating a line of compression. Then, carefully and slowly peel off the tape- you will see the compression line travel down the length of the tape, ahead of where the tape comes up. How does this happen?

N.A. de Bruyne, The action of adhesives, Scientific American 206 (1962), pp. 114–126

DR.NORMAN A. de BRUYNE "How Glue Sticks" Nature 180, 262-266 (10 August 1957) doi:10.1038/180262a0
 
jangheej said:
I have a question about force needed to peel a tape.

1. If an external force does work on a tape, to what kind of energy is it transformed?
There must be some kind of energy stored in the tape, but I can't think of any.
some papers mention "strain energy", but I don't grasp the concept of it.

2. Where does the adhesive force come from? Is it from Van der waals force?

3. I drew the forces in the attached file, and accordingly, since the vertical component of the external force increases as the theta increases, it must be easier to peel the tape off the surface when the angle increases. But theories and simple experiments show the opposite result. What is wrong with the picture?

Are you sure about your conclusion to number three?I suggest you try it out.
You may get some useful information by googling "triboluminescence".
 
Try this...
take a dry erase board and derive maxwells equations from first principles.
When done , take the dry erase eraser and erase the board. While still holding the eraser
touch something electricialy grounded. The spark you see represents the electrostatic
energy which was holding the ink onto the board.
(If you try it without ink, no spark. )
Try it...
Tim
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top