What Happens to Matter Before a Black Hole Collapses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter japam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the processes that occur to matter before it collapses into a black hole. It highlights the conflict between general relativity and quantum theory regarding the nature of collapsing matter, suggesting that while general relativity predicts a singularity, quantum mechanics complicates this view. Astrophysicists assert that a star's mass determines its fate; when it exhausts fusion elements, gravity will cause it to collapse into a dense object unless electron degeneracy pressure counteracts this. If the mass exceeds a critical threshold, gravity overcomes this pressure, leading to black hole formation. The conversation underscores the complexities of stellar evolution and the limits of current theoretical frameworks.
japam
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
My question is related to black holes, well there are many books and writings that explain what a black hole is and all AFTER collapse but i have seen few that explains the BEFORE collapse; exactly how is that matter can be squeezed to an infintesimal point, ¿what effects could one expect to see before the collapse?
¿why are astrophysicists so sure that if a star has the critical mass , then it would inexorably colapse to a black hole, why can't be that could exist other types of star collapses apart of white dwars and neutron stars?
¿if black holes really exists , doesn't this imply that electrons and all elemental particles can be splittered infinitely ? so they are not elemental
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The question of what happens to matter inside a black hole is still open. Collapsing to a point is preducted by general relativity theory, but quantum theory which also has to hold is in conflict.

The densist form of matter outside black holes is that of a neutron star (no electrons). If a neutron star is big enough, its Schwarzschild radius will be greater than the radius of the star. This is the point where current theory breaks down.
 
My understanding is that current theory implies that time would be distorted to such an extent that any collapse that has been initiated could not have proceeded to a singularity relative to us. Collapsing matter would be frozen at the event horizon, from our point of view.
 
japam said:
¿why are astrophysicists so sure that if a star has the critical mass , then it would inexorably colapse to a black hole, why can't be that could exist other types of star collapses apart of white dwars and neutron stars?
l

They believe this because a stars mass (in general) will tell us what a star is composed of - and when it runs out of elements to fuse it will collapse under gravity to form an extremely dense object.
 
If the mass is small enough when the star begins to 'collapse' electrons in the star will get 'claustraphobic' and start vibrating very rapidly, which is known as electron degeneracy, therefore it exerts a pressure pushing outwards, if there is not enough mass (gravity) to counter this, then they live in a cute little equilibrium as a white dwarf or neutron star.

If the star is too massive, then the gravity is too strong and will overcome the pressure of the degeneracy (i think the is neutron degeneracy too) and it will collapse into a black hole.

It's been years since I've read an astrophysics book though, but I am sure that is fairly accurate.
 
That sounds very familiar from some thermal physics lecture last year Riogho!

I think you're correct :)
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top