What Is a Couple in Engineering Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pseudo Statistic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A couple in engineering mechanics consists of two equal, parallel, and oppositely directed forces that create a rotational effect without generating a net force. Unlike third-law force pairs, which act between two different bodies, a couple acts on the same body and is responsible for torque. When replacing a single force with another force and a couple, the goal is to maintain both the linear force and the rotational effect. The original force generates torque about a point, while applying the force at a different point eliminates that torque, necessitating the addition of a couple to replicate the original effects. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing forces and torques in mechanics.
Pseudo Statistic
Messages
391
Reaction score
6
Hey,
I recently got Schaum's Outlines: Enginering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics and started reading up on it...
Here's what confuses me from the text:
"A couple consists of two forces equal in magnitude and parallel, but oppositely directed."
Would that be similar to saying "A couple is pretty much a third-law force pair"?
That's what I "got" from that sentence, but hey, maybe I'm wrong.
Now, it proceeds to talk about replacing a single force:
"A single force F acting at point P may be replaced by (a) an equal and similarly directed force acting through any point O and (b) a couple C = r x F, where r is the vector from O to P."
Can someone explain why it would be justified to replace a single force by a couple? (Maybe I need a clarification on what a couple actually is)
Thanks a lot for any responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition given doesn't mention that a couple isn't co-linear - it's not clear from your post whether or not you realize this. A couple (or torque) is like an angular force - instead of acting to accelerate an object in a straight line, it accelerates it rotationally - i.e. starts to turn it about some axis.
 
Pseudo Statistic said:
Here's what confuses me from the text:
"A couple consists of two forces equal in magnitude and parallel, but oppositely directed."
Would that be similar to saying "A couple is pretty much a third-law force pair"?
Absolutely not! While it's true that the two forces comprising a couple are equal and opposite, they act on the same body. Third-law force pairs are always between two different interacting bodies and act along the same line.

Now, it proceeds to talk about replacing a single force:
"A single force F acting at point P may be replaced by (a) an equal and similarly directed force acting through any point O and (b) a couple C = r x F, where r is the vector from O to P."
Can someone explain why it would be justified to replace a single force by a couple?
They are not replacing a force by a couple! They are replacing one force by a second force (equal to the first but acting at a different point) plus a couple.

Realize that an applied force has two effects on an object: a "linear" effect (contributing to the net force on the object) and a "rotational" effect due to whatever torque it generates about some point. The "linear" effect is the same no matter where the force is applied, but the torque generated by a force depends on the point of application.

A couple exerts a torque but no net force. The original force F acting at point P exerts both a linear force (F) on the object plus a torque about point O. Applying the force F at point O would give the same linear force as before, but the torque about O would be zero. So, to properly duplicate the effect of the original force, you must add a couple to represent the torque about O.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top