B What is tension and how does it affect a rope?

AI Thread Summary
Tension is defined as the inward force that a rope exerts when under stress, acting at both ends where it is attached. It is a pulling force, not a pushing force, and is not classified as a vector. The discussion confirms that tension consists of opposite forces acting on small elements of the rope, which cancel each other out, while a single inward force acts at the ends. Participants express the need for a diagram to better illustrate these concepts. Understanding tension is crucial for analyzing forces in various physical scenarios.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
I have gathered everything from post “Monkey climbing up the rope” about tension.
Tension is basically a force that the rope applies back when it is under stress. It is an inward force. Tension T's direction at end points of rope where its attached to the body and ceiling is inwards. Tension is what we pull something with not push.

“Post in thread 'Monkey climbing up the rope'
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/monkey-climbing-up-the-rope.1012065/post-6598463


This video explains nicely how force applied is transmitted from one end of rope to other under tension.
Tension is not a vector.
I want to be verified: Someone said in other post I don’t know which one “tension is pair of opposite forces acting on small rope elements all along the rope ,when under tension ,cancelling each other. At the ends there is just one force acting inwards on each end”. Am I right? A diagram would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rudransh verma said:
Am I right?
Yes. But if you quote someone, that 'someone' is right.
A diagram would be helpful
Well, you should know enough by now to at least propose a diagram. Post it :smile: !

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes rudransh verma and russ_watters
BvU said:
Yes. But if you quote someone, that 'someone' is right.

Well, you should know enough by now to at least propose a diagram. Post it :smile: !

##\ ##
 

Attachments

  • xcvxb.png
    xcvxb.png
    917 bytes · Views: 142
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top