What is the length of a sector on a ring with radius R and angle dθ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the length of a sector on a ring with radius R and angle dθ. Participants explore the relationship between the distance from a point mass to the ring and the gravitational force, emphasizing the need to integrate over the ring to find the total force. The correct expression for the length of a sector is debated, with references to the uniform mass distribution of the ring and the integration of infinitesimal segments. The participants acknowledge the importance of understanding the relationship between the sector length and mass distribution. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in applying gravitational formulas to non-point masses.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See Attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I understand for the radius, the distance from m to M would be (d^2+r^2)^(1/2)
but sense the formula for gravitation is a inverse square of the displacement in between the two bodies it would be

1/(R^2+d^2)

I don't understand why the answer is in terms of d/(R^2+d^2)^(3/2)
thanks for any help
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    9.3 KB · Views: 555
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula F = \frac{G M m}{r^2}, where r is the distance between the bodies is valid only for point masses (We use it when calculating planetary motion because the size of the planets are so small compared to the distances between them that they can be approximated to be point masses).

In this case only one object is a point mass. The other is not.

The solution can be found by finding the force on the mass m due to an infinitesimally small point mass on the ring, and the integrating over the whole ring to find the total force.
 
I would like to grasp a good understanding of these types of problems...

So I have to integrate...
well... any infinity small point on the ring is a distance sqrt(d^2 + r^2)...
um so... an infinity small point mass on the ring dM...
um I'm not exactly sure what to do or what function I'm integrating...
I'm not exactly sure what the limits of the integral would be... hm...

I'm not really sure what to do
 
GreenPrint said:
well... any infinity small point on the ring is a distance sqrt(d^2 + r^2)...
Correct.

To find the mass of a very small part of the ring, consider the length of that part and the fact that the mass distribution of the ring is uniform.
 
well length of a sector is r^2/2 * angle (I actually had to look that one up)
if the angle becomes infinity small the length of the sector would be r^2/2 dtheta

so the length of the whole ring can be expressed as

1/2 * integral[0,2pi] R^2 dtheta

so a very small piece of the ring has a length of R^2/2 dtheta and is a distance of sqrt(R^2 + d^2)

I notice that both these quantities are in terms of R...

I don't see how the length of a section of the ring is related to the mass...
 
GreenPrint said:
well length of a sector is r^2/2 * angle
This cannot be correct. Look at the dimensions of (r^2/2*angle).

GreenPrint said:
if the angle becomes infinity small the length of the sector would be r^2/2 dtheta

so the length of the whole ring can be expressed as

1/2 * integral[0,2pi] R^2 dtheta
You have the right idea about using integration to find the total length (circumference) of the ring here, but you need to find the correct expression for the length of the sector.

GreenPrint said:
I don't see how the length of a section of the ring is related to the mass...
Consider the fact that the ring has a uniform mass distribution. If it's M for the total length of the ring, what is it going to be for the length of the section?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
477
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K