What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

In summary, the conversation consists of various discussions about documentaries, the acquisition of National Geographic by Fox, a funny manual translation, cutting sandwiches, a question about the proof of the infinitude of primes, and a realization about the similarity between PF and PDG symbols. The conversation also touches on multitasking and the uniqueness of the number two as a prime number.
  • #9,871
pinball1970 said:
However..this is one of the best movie scenes ever.
Well, I prefer the second part
I could never decide about the the first part that was it intentionally a parody or they took it seriously
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #9,872


Makes me wonder if I should request to see all future dates without makeup first?
 
  • #9,873
Get your little dogs ready for Halloween:

Screen Shot 2022-08-28 at 8.55.25 AM.png
If their legs wiggle when they run, they look pretty spider-like.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Bystander
  • #9,874
kyphysics said:


Makes me wonder if I should request to see all future dates without makeup first?

Impressive, how does she make the double chin disappear?
 
  • #9,875
pinball1970 said:
Impressive, how does she make the double chin disappear?
I think (hope) it's rather a transition (from a makeup to a different makeup) than just one makeup o_O
 
  • #9,876
Rive said:
I think (hope) it's rather a transition (from a makeup to a different makeup) than just one makeup o_O
She is squeezing her chin down a little accentuate it in the first part. Guys do not have any tricks unfortunately, the only thing we can do is shave really.
If I turn up to a date looking tired, rough or old that is just tough!
 
  • #9,877
pinball1970 said:
Guys do not have any tricks unfortunately, the only thing we can do is shave really.
And miss out on an opportunity to show off our magnificent beards?? (My wife keeps telling me I am free to shave it off if I want to, but that she will be disappointed… beard is staying…)
 
  • #9,878
Orodruin said:
And miss out on an opportunity to show off our magnificent beards?? (My wife keeps telling me I am free to shave it off if I want to, but that she will be disappointed… beard is staying…)
My beard is white now when I let grow. Not a good look for me.
 
  • #9,879
pinball1970 said:
My beard is white now when I let grow. Not a good look for me.
I know at least one person who has made a massive white beard work… 🎅
 
  • Haha
Likes berkeman and pinball1970
  • #9,880
Darwin?

Screen Shot 2022-08-28 at 8.10.27 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970 and dlgoff
  • #9,881
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre, fresh_42 and pinball1970
  • #9,882
pinball1970 said:
She is squeezing her chin down a little accentuate it in the first part. Guys do not have any tricks unfortunately, the only thing we can do is shave really.
If I turn up to a date looking tired, rough or old that is just tough!

According to a study in Evolution and Human Behavior (see YouTube above), men can rise in the physical attractiveness scale by 2 points if their salary was higher by a factor of 10.

Funnily, the same study found that for women to appear more attractive to men (also by 2 points), their salaries would have to increase by a factor of 1,000. :oops::wideeyed:?:)

Moral of the Story: Men care about looks a lot (and very little about how much money a woman earns), while women care about money somewhat in terms of how attractive they see you as?
 
  • #9,883
Most likely doing a degree in electronics engineering after I finish my undergraduate degree in chemistry. Tuition is free here, so that's not a problem. I don't know, just feels like the questions I had when going into chemistry have mostly been answered. Either way, I have the tools to find answers to them myself.

Also I don't want to be a desk chemist which is what 95% of chemists end up doing lol.
 
  • #9,884
kyphysics said:

According to a study in Evolution and Human Behavior (see YouTube above), men can rise in the physical attractiveness scale by 2 points if their salary was higher by a factor of 10.

Funnily, the same study found that for women to appear more attractive to men (also by 2 points), their salaries would have to increase by a factor of 1,000. :oops::wideeyed:?:)

Moral of the Story: Men care about looks a lot (and very little about how much money a woman earns), while women care about money somewhat in terms of how attractive they see you as?

I could do a whole thread on this seriously. What women want? Just the right amount of sensitivity, pet a dog and get gooey near kids. Go to the gym and get that athletic look but not much bulk, that's off putting. Earn a lot, if you are not that attractive just earn more. Dress well and if you work your ass off as a baker? In sweat heat and flour every day? Tough, she wants to see a bankers garb not a baker.
Look after yourself but don't be vain, smile but really MEAN it.
You have to smile right...I mean REALLY!?

The scariest thing about all this is that these are based on studies not anecdotes.
Therefore some validity and it certainly matches up with a few life experiences.

Something went wrong somewhere, something in our Evolutionary past that is at odds with our recent social Evolution?
Rhetorical question/thought.
 
  • #9,885
Mayhem said:
Most likely doing a degree in electronics engineering after I finish my undergraduate degree in chemistry. Tuition is free here, so that's not a problem. I don't know, just feels like the questions I had when going into chemistry have mostly been answered. Either way, I have the tools to find answers to them myself.

Also I don't want to be a desk chemist which is what 95% of chemists end up doing lol.
Where you based? Fees over 9k per year in UK.
Drug stores/Chemists/Pharmacists usually have a qualified Pharmacist who can give a quick consultation if you ask. If they are not sure they refer you back to your GP but normally they give good advice.
Also they are more connected directly with the drugs, that is their job.
They can also recommend unbranded stuff so a straight Chemist will not necessarily know any of that.
I came back from China convinced I had malaria as I got badly bitten by mosquitoes in a hotel lounge and I had huge bruises on my arms, I looked like a IV drug user.
Went to chemist, looked at the bruises, asked for the region I was in and concluded it was highly unlikely I was infected but to visit GP if I developed xyz symptoms.
This practice saves the NHS money taking up the Drs time.

So? No industrial Chemistry where you are? R&D?
 
  • #9,886
pinball1970 said:
Where you based? Fees over 9k per year in UK.
Drug stores/Chemists/Pharmacists usually have a qualified Pharmacist who can give a quick consultation if you ask. If they are not sure they refer you back to your GP but normally they give good advice.
Also they are more connected directly with the drugs, that is their job.
They can also recommend unbranded stuff so a straight Chemist will not necessarily know any of that.
I came back from China convinced I had malaria as I got badly bitten by mosquitoes in a hotel lounge and I had huge bruises on my arms, I looked like a IV drug user.
Went to chemist, looked at the bruises, asked for the region I was in and concluded it was highly unlikely I was infected but to visit GP if I developed xyz symptoms.
This practice saves the NHS money taking up the Drs time.

So? No industrial Chemistry where you are? R&D?
This is a confusing post, but to answer: Denmark, free tuition for all education except commercial pilot + some others I imagine. Industrial chemistry is a thing, but still the majority of positions are in analytical chemistry and I don't want to do that.
 
  • #9,887
Mayhem said:
This is a confusing post, but to answer: Denmark, free tuition for all education except commercial pilot + some others I imagine. Industrial chemistry is a thing, but still the majority of positions are in analytical chemistry and I don't want to do that.
I was just addressing your points.

1. You are in a decent position if you do not have University fees where you are.
2. Pharmacies have specialised individuals that provide a service that a straight Chemist would not be able to do. Processing a prescription is below what a graduate Chemist is capable of.
3. That was just an open question, you are a graduate Chemist,you must have liked and been enthused by the subject? I was just interested as EE seems like a jump.
Edit. Not a criticism, if I could have afforded to do another degree in Chemistry after my UG I probably would have done it.

It's a put off for women though be warned, they do not like serial students
 
  • #9,888
Seems someone has come up with some new glasses that can be adjusted on the spot by the wearer, providing 20/20 vision. Though haven't verified it.
 
  • #9,889
Someone asked me about the Butler matrix, but my matrices have already completed their dry-cleaning and other errands.
 
  • #9,890
pinball1970 said:
I was just addressing your points.

1. You are in a decent position if you do not have University fees where you are.
2. Pharmacies have specialised individuals that provide a service that a straight Chemist would not be able to do. Processing a prescription is below what a graduate Chemist is capable of.
3. That was just an open question, you are a graduate Chemist,you must have liked and been enthused by the subject? I was just interested as EE seems like a jump.
Edit. Not a criticism, if I could have afforded to do another degree in Chemistry after my UG I probably would have done it.

It's a put off for women though be warned, they do not like serial students
I like chemistry, but EE is also interesting and in the future it would be cool to work with the development of chemical analysis apparatuses.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #9,891
Someone in a Math video in YT makes free use of derivatives, using df/dx=dy/dx and dx/df =dx/dy , not addressing that in some cases, y may not be well-defined if y is not globally invertible. But they made a whole host of videos for free, so I feel guilty about possibly raining on their parade.
 
  • #9,892
Cool method for general parametrization of n-sphere in ##\mathbb R^{n+1} ##:

Start with
##Sin^2u +Cos^2u =1##

Multiply through by ##Sin^2 v ##:

##Sin^2 v Sin^2u + Sin^2vCos^2u=Sin^2v ## ; use ##Sin^2v=1-Cos^2v## , to get:

##(SinvSinu)^2 +(SinvCosu)^2 +Cos^2 =1 ##

And iterate for higher dimensions, multipliyng through by ##Sin^2w##* and using/subbing ##Sin^2 =1-Cos^2 ##.

*This must be a letter heretofore unused.
 
Last edited:
  • #9,893
pinball1970 said:
I could do a whole thread on this seriously. What women want? Just the right amount of sensitivity, pet a dog and get gooey near kids. Go to the gym and get that athletic look but not much bulk, that's off putting. Earn a lot, if you are not that attractive just earn more. Dress well and if you work your ass off as a baker? In sweat heat and flour every day? Tough, she wants to see a bankers garb not a baker.
Look after yourself but don't be vain, smile but really MEAN it.
You have to smile right...I mean REALLY!?

The scariest thing about all this is that these are based on studies not anecdotes.
Therefore some validity and it certainly matches up with a few life experiences.

Something went wrong somewhere, something in our Evolutionary past that is at odds with our recent social Evolution?
Rhetorical question/thought.
That's a good "list" of totally non-politically correct assumptions/stereotypes. :smile:

Sounds about right (on average) . . .

The dog/pet bit is very true. . .it's frequently listed as something that makes women more comfortable with you. ...

re: dressing well. . .This is anecdotal, but I usually hear complaints that guys still dress like they're in college even in their late-20's to 30's...hell, possibly even in their 40's...They wear shorts and t-shorts...or jeans and t-shirts...sweat pants and t-shirts, etc. The complain is that they don't have adult clothes.

Maybe women are naturally better dressers?
 
  • #9,894
There are a lot of asymmetries between the sexes general from a biological point of view. This includes differences in the amounts of resources invested and limitations on numbers of offspring in reproduction. To an extent, sexually different behaviors, ingrained by selection, will reflect these differences.

Making sperm vs. making eggs is a good example:
The production of an egg takes a lot more resources than an individual sperm. Post fertilization care (carrying a developing fetus if you are a mammal) is another burden on the female.
Sperm are relatively cheap to make on a sperm-by-sperm basis and they can be made in the billions.
Eggs (in mammals) are also made in limited numbers, which is a hard limited on the number of offspring. Numbers of offspring is a prime indicator of evolutionary success.

Parental care is another:
When sexually disproportionate parental care can exist 9generally, more on the females), there are good adaptive reasons for particular choices of mates by females.
For example: females would tend to choose mates with traits that indicate they would be productive (indications of wealth), feel responsible toward offspring and mate (treat dogs well?), and healthy (indicative of good genetics and long term productivity).
The Dr. Suess book Horton hatches the egg provides an alternative view of the investment of parental care, kind of like a cowbird.

There is a huge literature on mate choice and sexual differences.
There is also a lot of variation between different species.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Ibix
  • #9,895
BillTre said:
There are a lot of asymmetries between the sexes general from a biological point of view. This includes differences in the amounts of resources invested and limitations on numbers of offspring in reproduction. To an extent, sexually different behaviors, ingrained by selection, will reflect these differences.

Making sperm vs. making eggs is a good example:
The production of an egg takes a lot more resources than an individual sperm. Post fertilization care (carrying a developing fetus if you are a mammal) is another burden on the female.
Sperm are relatively cheap to make on a sperm-by-sperm basis and they can be made in the billions.
Eggs (in mammals) are also made in limited numbers, which is a hard limited on the number of offspring. Numbers of offspring is a prime indicator of evolutionary success.

Parental care is another:
When sexually disproportionate parental care can exist 9generally, more on the females), there are good adaptive reasons for particular choices of mates by females.
For example: females would tend to choose mates with traits that indicate they would be productive (indications of wealth), feel responsible toward offspring and mate (treat dogs well?), and healthy (indicative of good genetics and long term productivity).
The Dr. Suess book Horton hatches the egg provides an alternative view of the investment of parental care, kind of like a cowbird.

There is a huge literature on mate choice and sexual differences.
There is also a lot of variation between different species.
Battle of the Sexes was an eye opener
kyphysics said:
That's a good "list" of totally non-politically correct assumptions/stereotypes. :smile:

Sounds about right (on average) . . .

The dog/pet bit is very true. . .it's frequently listed as something that makes women more comfortable with you. ...

re: dressing well. . .This is anecdotal, but I usually hear complaints that guys still dress like they're in college even in their late-20's to 30's...hell, possibly even in their 40's...They wear shorts and t-shorts...or jeans and t-shirts...sweat pants and t-shirts, etc. The complain is that they don't have adult clothes.

Maybe women are naturally better dressers?
Those were all points in your video.
 
  • Haha
Likes kyphysics
  • #9,897
pinball1970 said:
Those were all points in your video.
:biggrin: Ohhhhhh! LOL Well, I guess that study confirms experience even more than I thought then.

Without even seeing the study results, I would have guessed some of those based on experience.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #9,898
When you see an interesting book on the sale bin, not sure if it's worthwhile. Its " The Physics of Time" by R. Mueller.
 
  • #9,899
Bizarre email from a former school in which I'm chided by not providing an _ anonymous_ and _ voluntary_ evaluation of the program.
 
  • #9,900
Back in the mid 90's, I got an email asking for parts for a time machine. Still waiting to see if I'll be the one that sent that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWGD and BillTre
  • #9,901
Borg said:
Back in the mid 90's, I got an email asking for parts for a time machine. Still waiting to see if I'll be the one that sent that.
And you sent them the parts back to the future, right?
 
  • #9,902
I'm still waiting for the parts also. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #9,903
Borg said:
I'm still waiting for the parts also. :oldwink:
Re time travel, the store " It's Sugar" will likely be renamed to " It's Diabetes now" in a few years.
 
  • #9,904
I just got this from my daughter about her single engine flying:

I’m about to start flying again to work on my commercial certificate ...
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Borg and BillTre
  • #9,905
Have wondered if there are dictionaries for languages , thinking of Chinese/Japanese, where words do not have a natural ordering.
 

Similar threads

35
Replies
1K
Views
32K
Replies
3K
Views
145K
Replies
2K
Views
158K
Replies
4K
Views
216K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top