What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

In summary, the conversation consists of various discussions about documentaries, the acquisition of National Geographic by Fox, a funny manual translation, cutting sandwiches, a question about the proof of the infinitude of primes, and a realization about the similarity between PF and PDG symbols. The conversation also touches on multitasking and the uniqueness of the number two as a prime number.
  • #1,716
fresh_42 said:
I did this and had 38. Mostly wrong were American history and literature, e.g. I missed the Wright brothers flight by a year or connected the EPA with Carter.
Yes, it is biased towards the US, and considering that, your score is pretty good. I am sure if I had to deal with German culture and history (let alone some non-Western ) I would have gotten much lower score. I retook it just to re-inforce the ones I guessed and to re-examine the ones I got wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,717
WWGD said:
Yes, it is biased towards the US, and considering that, your score is pretty good. I am sure if I had to deal with German culture and history (let alone some non-Western ) I would have gotten much lower score. I retook it just to re-inforce the ones I guessed and to re-examine the ones I got wrong.
But I did the M*A*S*H one until the first quarter and had not a single mistake...:headbang:
 
  • #1,718
fresh_42 said:
But I did the M*A*S*H one until the first quarter and had not a single mistake...:headbang:
Yes, I did embarrassingly well on the TV section too. I guess you watch late night tv ? I used too, until I could not afford $110/month for internet + Cable TV. EDIT: Now I just use the neighbor's wi-fi ( with their permission) and use alternative TV suppliers, but these carry less content and less variety. EDIT2: Since you mentioned the references to US culture and history, I was reminded of the question on who was the inventor (discoverer?) of binary numbers (or was it binary algebra?). I thought it was Boole, but according to the quiz, it was Leibniz. (BTW: look at this: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=leibniz+cookies&t=ha&ia=web )
 
Last edited:
  • #1,719
WWGD said:
A new pope? Too bad the new pope , somehow with (almost) the same name as the actor "Cliff" from Cheers, is not Polish.
This is kind of an imaginary pun, ennit? Sort of a √-(pun), or something.
 
  • #1,720
Thanks to ebay, I was able to replace my photo printer, which has been out of production for about ten years, with an exact copy. The "slightly used" replacement looks perfectly new and works beautifully. It was $63.00, including shipping, while the original was $99.00 plus tax.

I've been buying old, "expired" ink cartridges on ebay for years now, and 90% have worked like new. I just printed a great print with a cartridge that "expired" in 2009. These are original HP cartridges made for the printer, not refilled, not some strange aftermarket equivalent. They were something like $30.00 brand new. On ebay you can find them for around $12.00-$14.00.

I tried an Epsom printer once, and the quality of the photo printing was horrible.
 
  • #1,721
Ouch! I am reading , or more like browsing, a book on rules of thumb. A rule of thumb for having a good, entertaining party ( or get together)
is that at most 25% of the guests should be economists.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,722
Last edited:
  • #1,723
So many wasted years in school. I could have just read these two books which, set theoretically speaking, contain all of the information in the entire universe.

What+they+do+and+don't+teach+you+at+Harvard+Business+school+dr+heckle+funny+wtf+pictures.jpg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-4-5_15-37-15.png
    upload_2017-4-5_15-37-15.png
    27.9 KB · Views: 380
  • Like
Likes BillTre and nuuskur
  • #1,724
It's amazing they fit the complement in a single book ! :O
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and dkotschessaa
  • #1,725
It would be interesting (and pretty shameless ) if the same guy had written both books.
 
  • #1,726
WWGD said:
Don't mean to kiss up to PF, but , outside of PF there are few sites I have encountered that filter out crackpots and general unsupported ( often unsupportable ) nonsense. Good idea too, to filter out Pro- and Anti- Trump posts.

I have recently taken up studying history as like a side, side, side project (from studying and working and having a family) and I joined a history forum to talk with other like minded people. I'm finding it really difficult to communicate online with non PF people. This place has me spoiled.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and WWGD
  • #1,727
WWGD said:
Correction: quiz is at :

http://definition.org/how-smart-are-you-quiz/

EDIT: I am not sure it is a well-designed quiz, but, since I did well, partly through luck, I am pretending that it is for now :).

It says:
I got 32 of 50 right Wow! You got your Bachelor's degree!Technically this is true until I pass my qualifier.
 
  • #1,728
dkotschessaa said:
This place has me spoiled.
And not to forget about the vocabulary. Formerly I thought the f-word is bad, and bs isn't much better either. Puh! Those are for amateurs! The really mean ones are: Copenhagen, Bell, Bohr, wave-particle duality, FTL, event horizon, simultaneous and a couple more!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dkotschessaa
  • #1,729
fresh_42 said:
And not to forget about the vocabulary. Formerly I thought the f-word is bad, and bs isn't much better either. Puh! Those are for amateurs! The really mean ones are: Copenhagen, Bell, Bohr, wave-particle duality, FLT, event horizon, simultaneous and a couple more!

Together with posts that are little more than strongly-expressed opinions with little, if any support for them. They somehow describe these as arguments, which they are only in the strictly literal sense of the word, but of very poor quality, of low level.
 
  • #1,730
WWGD said:
Together with posts that are little more than strongly-expressed opinions with little, if any support for them.
That's in the same category as "somewhere" (I have read somewhere ...). Man, these are meeaaan.
 
  • #1,731
fresh_42 said:
That's in the same category as "somewhere" (I have read somewhere ...). Man, these are meeaaan.

How about the reverse nonsense that just because they do not believe something or are not aware of it, that the something is not so? How (implicitly) arrogant: I can't conceive of or understand something, then that something cannot be so.
 
  • #1,733
WWGD said:
How about the reverse nonsense that just because they do not believe something or are not aware of it, that the something is not so? How (implicitly) arrogant: I can't conceive of or understand something, then that something cannot be so.
Uh! The clerical argument. We call this "counsel-resistant" in German.
 
  • #1,734
WWGD said:
Together with posts that are little more than strongly-expressed opinions with little, if any support for them.

Recall Mark Twain's quip about righteous indignation - "The more vehement , the less righteous."
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #1,735
jim hardy said:
Recall Mark Twain's quip about righteous indignation - "The more vehement , the less righteous."

True in my experience, the most radical ones happen to be the least well informed. I dread the opinions of those that are too clear and with little doubt on things other than facts. I have no problem with informal arguments during casual exchanges, but it seems a matter of basic honesty that, as you said, the vehemence in which the argument is expressed should be directly proportional to the strength of the evidence to support said argument. But, yes, the opposite seems most often to be the case.
 
  • #1,736
Bandersnatch said:
How smart are you, quiz?
I guessed Europa, which seemed to be correct. And I did state that I was not sure the test effectively measures intelligence if anything, only that , to satisfy my ego, I am claiming it does, since I did well on it. But I don't see how ( the answer to ) a single question can reveal much of anything about someone.
 
  • #1,737
WWGD said:
Snip
Sorry, I wasn't clear on what I meant. It was a 'groan' post, since there's no such thing as a Jovian moon called 'Lo'.
 
  • #1,738
Bandersnatch said:
Sorry, I wasn't clear on what I meant. It was a 'groan' post, since there's no such thing as a Jovian moon called 'Lo'.
And 'Behold' ? ;)
 
  • Like
Likes Bandersnatch
  • #1,739
WWGD said:
And 'Behold' ? ;)
Now I'm thinking how much room for improving the names of the moons in the solar system there is. Phobos and Deimos could be renamed after your suggestion Lo and Behold. Saturn's moons could bear the names of the consecutive words in the 'itsy bitsy spider' nursery rhyme. And Jupiter's Galilean moons could be renamed 'Three little piggies' - all four of them, just to mess with people.
Now I just need a time machine and fix the world right.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #1,740
Quiche? Nothing more than egg pie. How, then, can it taste so good?
 
  • #1,741
Bandersnatch said:
Now I'm thinking how much room for improving the names of the moons in the solar system there is. Phobos and Deimos could be renamed after your suggestion Lo and Behold.

Eek! :nb) I prefer Phobos and Deimos, roughly translated as "fear" and "panic." Those work best in my opinion.

I'm sure @Drakkith would agree.* :wink:

*This is a reference to the video game, Doom, btw. The original game took place on the moons, Phobos and Deimos.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and fresh_42
  • #1,742
I was thinking my way through a topology problem this morning and realized that it would be much facilitated by using play-doh. If my son is cool with it I am going to borrow his. I don't think he will mind. (So far he has only tried to eat it and did not seem to be very fond of it).
 
  • #1,743
fresh_42 said:
And not to forget about the vocabulary. Formerly I thought the f-word is bad, and bs isn't much better either. Puh! Those are for amateurs! The really mean ones are: Copenhagen, Bell, Bohr, wave-particle duality, FLT, event horizon, simultaneous and a couple more!

Yes and often those concepts get...entangled.

OOPS! :nb)
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #1,744
I need to watch the elevator buttons more carefully. For the second time I accidentally pressed the 'close door' button when a
frail old lady was trying to get in. I got plenty of dirty looks.
 
  • #1,745
WWGD said:
I need to watch the elevator buttons more carefully. For the second time I accidentally pressed the 'close door' button when a
frail old lady was trying to get in. I got plenty of dirty looks.
Did you explain it? Like:
"She obviously needs some practice. Better she takes the stairs."
 
  • Like
Likes dkotschessaa
  • #1,746
fresh_42 said:
Did you explain it? Like:
"She obviously needs some practice. Better she takes the stairs."
No, I finessed it: " Hey, hurry up or get the hell out. I have no time for this #$% ".
 
  • Like
Likes dkotschessaa
  • #1,747
WWGD said:
No, I finessed it: " Hey, hurry up or get the hell out. I have no time for this #$% ".

"I gave you the challenge because I believe in you!"
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and WWGD
  • #1,748
dkotschessaa said:
I was thinking my way through a topology problem this morning and realized that it would be much facilitated by using play-doh. If my son is cool with it I am going to borrow his. I don't think he will mind. (So far he has only tried to eat it and did not seem to be very fond of it).
Don't know how you will submit play-doh (play d'oh! for Homer ) in exam, kind of messy for prof. to reconstruct proof.
 
  • #1,749
WWGD said:
No, I finessed it: " Hey, hurry up or get the hell out. I have no time for this #$% ".
Sorry, this is the triple espresso version.
 
  • #1,750
WWGD said:
Sorry, this is the triple espresso version.
Or the hypocritical version: "Sorry, I just farted. I'm too ashamed."
 

Similar threads

38
Replies
1K
Views
35K
Replies
3K
Views
147K
Replies
2K
Views
159K
Replies
4K
Views
217K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top