- #1,996
zoobyshoe
- 6,510
- 1,291
Josh Gates never finds the buried treasure, but he always finds one of the pirates' belt buckles.
Ibix said:You had me going for a moment - I wasn't sure I was using the term correctly. Let’s just say I probably wouldn't pass the qualifier...
I can only imagine the disappointment :s In light of the content of some of your other work, things are still ok, no?dkotschessaa said:Turns out I didn't. Argh!
There was always the possibility and it is common for people to fail the first time. I was taking practice ones from 9 - 12 almost every Saturday. I had to "rehearse" when I had breakfast and ate and drank and whatnot (blood sugar condition so I had to be sure). 3 days before the test I got sick, and one day before the test the whole thing was moved up to 10:00 am due to a campus event. (Something they have never, ever done before) Won't say that is the reason for my failure but it sure didn't help.
back too the whiteboard for 4 months... in between work and online classes and baby..
nuuskur said:I can only imagine the disappointment :s In light of the content of some of your other work, things are still ok, no?
Best of luck next time.
Have you received any specific criticism on your test or they just said you didn't pass?
Personally, I am not sure what a terrier looks like, so a picture definitely helps. I don't know the names of too many dog styles. I know pit bulls because I think they have alligator faces. Dalmations have spots. German shepherds have that dangerous wolfy edge. The Irish wolf hound is really big. The golden retriever is blond and friendly. That's about it. Well, the chiuhahua. However you spell it. Sometimes I've seen a certain kind of dog and wondered if it might be a rotweiller. St. Bernard, of course. That's about it. Well, the husky. Cats are easier, there's only three styles: normal, siamese, and smash-faced. Well, there's long haired and short haired and bald, I guess.WWGD said:I get why people put signs offering rewards for finding their lost dogs. What I don't get is why they include actual pictures of their dog instead of just a general description. Can most people tell apart two different dogs of the same "family", similar size, of the same color? I mean, there two black terriers of similar size. Can you tell them apart just because one has, e.g., a smaller nose, etc?
With that short snout ? Piranha is more like it.zoobyshoe said:I know pit bulls because I think they have alligator faces.
It's the set of their eyes and the way their mouths curve up and back down at the back of the jaw.jim hardy said:With that short snout ? Piranha is more like it.
nuuskur said:Surface integrals are a work of evil.
Yes, I just suggestzoobyshoe said:Personally, I am not sure what a terrier looks like, so a picture definitely helps. I don't know the names of too many dog styles. I know pit bulls because I think they have alligator faces. Dalmations have spots. German shepherds have that dangerous wolfy edge. The Irish wolf hound is really big. The golden retriever is blond and friendly. That's about it. Well, the chiuhahua. However you spell it. Sometimes I've seen a certain kind of dog and wondered if it might be a rotweiller. St. Bernard, of course. That's about it. Well, the husky. Cats are easier, there's only three styles: normal, siamese, and smash-faced. Well, there's long haired and short haired and bald, I guess.
Well done, Sir, real-life Mathematics/Engineering.jim hardy said:I remember greatly enjoying them on straightforward surfaces like a sphere. Then you hit real world where nothing quite fits those nice textbook examples. Aaarghhh !
A volume integral for a vertical cylindrical tank with elliptical top and bottom once drove me bananas..
Biggest problem was arctan function blew up at some particular value
so i wrote a Taylor series expansion for it
All i had was a TI-99 with interpreted Basic , it was really fun to watch it think as it iterated in on solutions near the cusp.
But i got an "Attaboy" for producing the calibration curve of gallons versus height. We made a special scale for the meter to accommodate the nonlinearity.
old jim
Out of interest, why not dump water in the top gallon by gallon and mark the level?jim hardy said:But i got an "Attaboy" for producing the calibration curve of gallons versus height. We made a special scale for the meter to accommodate the nonlinearity.
Good idea, or, by ( I assume) symmetry, fill it approx halfway and double the total.Ibix said:Out of interest, why not dump water in the top gallon by gallon and mark the level?
Or simply fill only the right half, so one can put the ruler inside and mark it more accurately.WWGD said:Good idea, or, by ( I assume) symmetry, fill it approx halfway and double the total.
How do you fill just the right half without water poring through?fresh_42 said:Or simply fill only the right half, so one can put the ruler inside and mark it more accurately.
Fill the left half first of course.WWGD said:How do you fill just the right half without water poring through?
...being careful not to overfill it. You wouldn't want to double-fill the overlap.Borg said:Fill the left half first of course.
Or the center one, leaving the bottom and top quarters empty. It reminds me of designated quiet areas in some libraries that are right next to ones where speaking is allowed ( and a -loud too ;) ) as if sound will follow orders and stop beyond the speaking-allowed areas.Borg said:Fill the left half first of course.
Ibix said:...dump water in the top gallon by gallon and mark the level?
Wasn't that what Michio Kaku was doing ??WWGD said:...fill it approx halfway and double the total.
dkotschessaa said:...figure skating.
In a very abstract way, yes ;).OCR said:Wasn't that what Michio Kaku was doing ??
It was about a twelve thousand gallon tank. In a radioactive location. And in a nuke plant everything has to be backed by an engineering calculation.Ibix said:Out of interest, why not dump water in the top gallon by gallon and mark the level?
Three excellent reasons...jim hardy said:twelve thousand gallon tank. In a radioactive location. And in a nuke plant everything has to be backed by an engineering calculation.
No " Homer-Simpsoning" allowed ?jim hardy said:It was about a twelve thousand gallon tank. In a radioactive location. And in a nuke plant everything has to be backed by an engineering calculation.
Initially we only used the cylindrical mid-part of the tank, with level instrument taps located at the joints between cylindrical midsection and elliptical top/bottom. So "Empty" indication was really a foot or so above the actual bottom and "Full" similarly about a foot below the actual top.
Engineering decided we needed a little more useable tank capacity so rather than buy a bigger tank they sent in the welders to move the level measuring taps to very tip-top and bottom of tank, adding a couple feet of measurable height. But those extra two feet being in curved sections of the tank had nonlinear gallons versus %level. And we wanted readout for the operators in gallons not % level.
Somehow it fell to me, a lowly instrument maintenance guy, to produce the calculation to make the inventory meter read correct number of gallons. . It was actually quite fun.
Homer was quite a bit higher in the company than I .WWGD said:No " Homer-Simpsoning" allowed ?
I'm wondering: why the odd shape for the tank?jim hardy said:It was about a twelve thousand gallon tank. In a radioactive location. And in a nuke plant everything has to be backed by an engineering calculation.
Initially we only used the cylindrical mid-part of the tank, with level instrument taps located at the joints between cylindrical midsection and elliptical top/bottom. So "Empty" indication was really a foot or so above the actual bottom and "Full" similarly about a foot below the actual top.
Engineering decided we needed a little more useable tank capacity so rather than buy a bigger tank they sent in the welders to move the level measuring taps to very tip-top and bottom of tank, adding a couple feet of measurable height. But those extra two feet being in curved sections of the tank had nonlinear gallons versus %level. And we wanted readout for the operators in gallons not % level.
Somehow it fell to me, a lowly instrument maintenance guy, to produce the calculation to make the inventory meter read correct number of gallons. . It was actually quite fun.
I have no doubt it was ordered by a bean counter considering volume not shape. Those guys do help make engineers lives interesting though.zoobyshoe said:I'm wondering: why the odd shape for the tank?
zoobyshoe said:I'm wondering: why the odd shape for the tank?
Oh! Now that I see the pictures, it's clear. I was envisioning the ellipse being on a different axis, like if you took a paper towel tube and squeezed the ends.jim hardy said:Actually it's fairly common the have elliptical ends on a tank.