What is the Work Done by a Heated Metal Rod?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a heated metal rod based on its physical properties, including length, cross-sectional area, Young's modulus, and coefficient of linear expansion. The formula derived for work done is 1/2 YAL(α∆t)², which is compared to a book's answer of 1/2 YAL(αt)². The discrepancy arises from the assumption of a reference temperature, with the book likely using zero degrees Celsius. Participants note that the problem statement does not specify a reference temperature, leading to confusion. Ultimately, both answers appear to be correct under different assumptions regarding the initial temperature.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

Homework Statement


a metal rod of length "L",cross sectional area "A",young modulus "Y" and coefficient of linear expansion "α " is heated to "t" degree celsius .The work that can be performed by the rod when heated is

Homework Equations


work done by rod when heated=1/2 force exerted by rod(when heated) multiplied by extension
I know force exerted by rod(when heated)=Y α ∆t multiplied by A
(here ∆t is increase in temperature by due to heating)and extension would be final length -initial length let L' be final length.So extension would be L' - L
As L'=L(1 +α ∆t )
So L' - L=Lα ∆t

The Attempt at a Solution


with the help of equations above we can see
work done by rod when heated=1/2 Y α ∆t A multiplied by Lα ∆t
=1/2 YAL(α ∆t )^2
right?but in my book answer is given 1/2 YAL(αt)^2
which one is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the reference for the exercise writer is zero degrees celsius. You take a more general approach where the environment temperature can be 0 or 20 or whatever.
Apart from that I see no difference between your answer and the book answer ..

--
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
It looks like the reference for the exercise writer is zero degrees celsius.
if that's the case then
BvU said:
no difference between your answer and the book answer ..
but as we can see nothing such is mentioned in the question
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
875
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K