- #106
Dagenais
- 290
- 4
What is more important: Liberty or safety?
Complete liberty would be Anarchism. Not many want that.
I think the liberty we are allowed in Canada is perfect. I can say I feel relatively safe. There are less gang-related crimes, but they still exist.
Also, Canadians, please explain this:
The Queen reigns but does not rule.
She finished touring Canada a couple of years ago. Last time she came to B.C., she watched a hockey came. The cost of her trip was outrageous enough to make the papers. I don't remember how much it cost, but it was an offensive amount.
As far as her influence in Quebec? We can't stand her and she knows that. I don't recall her even visiting Quebec in 2002 on her "Tour of Canada."
She probably realizes she's not welcomed there and we'd "boo" her. Quebec is too smart for a monarchy. You might want to read this news link. It's pretty interesting:
http://www.canada.com/national/features/royalvisit/story.html?id=5E8D9C01-72FE-4B1D-A2B2-41FDD4368FD2
There are currently four political parties represented in Parliament and with a minority government like we have now, there’s really a lot of restriction on what the Prime Minister and party in power can do.
At least the Democrats have a chance against the Republicans. The Liberals aren't losing a national election anytime soon.
I favour Kerry over Bush, but I don't think Georgie is that bad. Like Don Cherry or Harper, I'm more upset at Canada not backing the US in it's war against Iraq.
The United States is ready to back Canada's ass up when trouble occurs. Too bad we can't do the same.
Last edited by a moderator: