What Makes Canada a Great Place to Live?

In summary, Canada is a great place to live with many opportunities. It has a liberal government, great healthcare, and a safe environment. The only downside is that it can be expensive to live there.
  • #141
Dagenais said:
Vancouver Grizzlies to Memphis.
Montreal Expos to D.C.

Sports analysts predict more to come (Blue Jays, even Raptors).



A decent home? Define "decent." If you've been living affluently your whole life, decent is in a whole different category than someone who came out of inner city US.

Houses in British Columbia are high (mentioned many times already). A large majority of the very large houses or custom built ones are owned by Chinese or East Indian immigrants.

This link should be very helpful:

Check: here

BTW, you're from Portland Ivan? Big sarcastic thanks for helping the MLB in its effort to take our baseball team. Merci de rien!

Has nothing to do with winning the cup.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #142
Ivan Seeking said:
Also, Canadians, please explain this:
The Queen reigns but does not rule.
The queen reigns because Canada is part of the Commonwealth, and the queen is the (symbolic) head of the Commonwealth nations. If you go to any Commonwealth country, you will probably find that the queen as some significant presence there also. As others have pointed out, it's a symbolic position only now and she has no governance powers aside from a rubber stamp in the form of the Governor General.

And you will probably find there are just as many Canadians in favour of keeping the monarchy figurehead as there are opposed to it. It's a tradition thing.
 
  • #143
A great American once said "Give me Liberty or give me Death!"

A great Canadian once said "Give me Liberty or... is there any more beer?"
 
  • #144
What if the liberties taken away are your beer...and hockey? :biggrin:
 
  • #145
Blood would be running in the streets.
 
  • #146
Smurf said:
Blood would be running in the streets.
:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #147
I'd sacrifice liberty for hockey and beer!

"Those who choose to not enjoy hockey and beer and settles for liberty shall never be granted hockey or beer." Ben Franklin 1755 (When he visited Ottawa.)
 
  • #148
I think hockey is a group of sports watched by morons and simpletons.Hockey is good for children to watch though.
Thank God for NHL lock out. :smile:
 
  • #149
tumor said:
I think hockey is a group of sports watched by morons and simpletons.Hockey is good for children to watch though.
Thank God for NHL lock out. :smile:

Blasphemous Heretic! Thou Shalt Be Destroyed by My Mighty Hockey Stick!
 
  • #150
Didn't read the whole thread...just some notes:

I'm in Vancouver right now...gas price fluctuates between 69.9 cents per litre and 91.4 cents per litre within the span of one day! (price war, I guess). There are intermediate prices as well...it's just totally weird.

Somebody mentioned that he thought Canada 'gained' independence "in 1863 or something', and there was a later correction that is was actually 1960! What?

How can you be Canadian and not know that Confederation was on July 1st, 1867? What do you think Canada day is celebrating? That's our equivalent to the "4th of July" man! If you people don't know anything about Canadian history, then please do not try to educate Americans about it. Not all provinces joined confederation immediately, (my home province, Alberta, joined in 1905), but for all intents and purposes, that's when Canada came into being, and was no longer a British colony. That's when the first version of the constitution..."the British-North America Act", was made. It has been revised numerous times, admittedly, well into the 20th century. I believe that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in its present form dates back a few decades at most.

Another claim was made that Canada 'gained independence' in exchange for helping fight against Germany in WWI! Umm...notice that this was 47 years after Confederation. It's true that at the time, Canada still had VERY close ties with Great Britain. When Britain declared war, Canada felt that it was at war by default..."an attack on the mother country is an attack on us" was the mentality at the time. Since our troops performed with distinction, the first world war marked the first time that Canada came to be *viewed* as a distinct nation with something to offer. HOWEVER, Canada "coming into its own" is not the same thing as Canada first becoming a unified nation.

This thread seems to have an inordinate amount of perpetuation of Canadian stereotypes, and a lot of needless belittling of Americans. Do we really need to showcase our whopping inferiority complex for all to see? I can't stand the Bush administration, but I have nothing against America itself, neither it's people (who are great) nor the principles on which it was founded...which ought to be remphasized in this era...lest they be overshadowed by Bush's reign of fear. And if you don't agree with me on that last point, fine. Who was it who said..."I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it!". I think that sentiment resonates with Canadians and Americans alike.
 
  • #151
Cepheid does not represent me.

(while I may not know when the Confederation was founded I can tell you anything you want to know about Canadian Military history. Oh and after WW1 we gained control of our Foreign Relations and Policy. As did Australia.)
 
Last edited:
  • #152
Smurf...can you please elaborate on what you meant? I am vehemently against the war in Iraq, and the current Bush administration, and the new trend towards imperialism, and the new phenonmenon of the religious right imposing its doctrine on the populace, and trying to make discriminatory laws that impinge on people's rights. I am also against insulting people needlessly. Finally, I believe in free speech. That's what I was trying to get across in my post. So, if my views are not representative of yours at all, then I guess that means you are:

pro war
pro Bush
pro religious extremism
pro insulting Americans for no good reason
anti free speech.

:confused: Clearly NOT...we share the same views. I was simply advocating keeping an OPEN mind, so that we are not guilty of same arrogance that we accuse Americans of displaying...why are you speaking out against me?
 
Last edited:
  • #153
Smurf said:
Blasphemous Heretic! Thou Shalt Be Destroyed by My Mighty Hockey Stick!

Try me
Hockey sucks He He He He, big time! :wink:
 
  • #154
cepheid said:
This thread seems to have an inordinate amount of perpetuation of Canadian stereotypes,

If you're referring to all the HOC-KEY comments then I don't think it's necessarily perpetuating a stereotype. It's been my experience as a Canadian, that a very large number of Canadians are fanatical about HOC-KEY. Hell, even the majority of my friends who weren't born here have grown to become fanatical about HOC-KEY. I think it's something in the water...
 
  • #155
It is matter of weeks before first signs of Hockey withdrawall will show up in generall population.(beatings,riots, etc,)
Even when NHL is playing I'm sometimes scared to go outside,imagine no hockey for a whole of winter. :bugeye:
 
  • #156
This is straying even further off topic but.. considering the new smoking ban in bars, and the lack of a hockey season. I wonder how terrible of an effect this is going to have on sports bars in Toronto and the GTA.
 
  • #157
revelator said:
If you're referring to all the HOC-KEY comments then I don't think it's necessarily perpetuating a stereotype. It's been my experience as a Canadian, that a very large number of Canadians are fanatical about HOC-KEY. Hell, even the majority of my friends who weren't born here have grown to become fanatical about HOC-KEY. I think it's something in the water...



Dude...I AM Canadian...and the hockey stuff was just in good fun, but it doesn't make you look very intelligent if you say that you'd trade in your freedom for beer...and other stereotypes I was referring to was the incredible display of unity we Canadians put on in this thread...the Quebec guy insults the BC school system and implies that all Albertans are rednecks, and that they must all agree with Republican views by default (nooooo thank you) Next thing he knows, he's being faced with some anti-french statements and being told that no, actually, it's the Quebec students who are dumb...sheesh! Then there's the Toronto guy who seems bent on proving our superiority to Americans in every possible way, thus perpetuating the embarassing fact that a large part of our national pride stems from the fact that we are *not* like Americans...we don't have enough of a national identity to state what we are, but only what we are not? You see what I meant now...we were perpetuating all of the stererotypes about each other. I just think we didn't come across as very intelligent refined, or enlightened, despite our claims to the contrary.
 
  • #158
revelator said:
This is straying even further off topic but.. considering the new smoking ban in bars, and the lack of a hockey season. I wonder how terrible of an effect this is going to have on sports bars in Toronto and the GTA.

Maybe hockey fans start to read books. :smile: just kidding.
 
  • #159
cepheid said:
Dude...I AM Canadian...and the hockey stuff was just in good fun, but it doesn't make you look very intelligent if you say that you'd trade in your freedom for beer...and other stereotypes I was referring to was the incredible display of unity we Canadians put on in this thread...the Quebec guy insults the BC school system and implies that all Albertans are rednecks, and that they must all agree with Republican views by default (nooooo thank you) Next thing he knows, he's being faced with some anti-french statements and being told that no, actually, it's the Quebec students who are dumb...sheesh! Then there's the Toronto guy who seems bent on proving our superiority to Americans in every possible way, thus perpetuating the embarassing fact that a large part of our national pride stems from the fact that we are *not* like Americans...we don't have enough of a national identity to state what we are, but only what we are not? You see what I meant now...we were perpetuating all of the stererotypes about each other. I just think we didn't come across as very intelligent refined, or enlightened, despite our claims to the contrary.

Sorry dude, never meant to imply your not Canadian! When you mentioned stereotypes, the hockey one was the only one that came to mind, and I responded with that mind.

Still there's a difference between insulting a school system and criticizing. Also, I don't recall anyone saying that all Albertans are rednecks and must support republican policy, although I have said in another thread that support for Bush runs highest in Alberta. Neither do I remember reading anything anti-French, just criticism of their system.

Then there's the Toronto guy who seems bent on proving our superiority to Americans in every possible way

Which guy? How?
 
  • #160
revelator said:
I don't recall anyone saying that all Albertans are rednecks and must support republican policy, although I have said in another thread that support for Bush runs highest in Alberta.

You know what was beautiful? when USA stopped importing Canadian beef.
Alberta's farmers those same pro war rednecks and biggest Bush supporters got screwed really good by their best friend.Since then I started believing in Karma Man!
 
  • #161
cepheid said:
and implies that all Albertans are rednecks
revelator said:
I don't recall anyone saying that all Albertans are rednecks
tumor said:
Alberta's farmers those same pro war rednecks

D'oh! [slaps self in head]

Serious though, I do hope the beef and softwood lumber disputes can be resolved soon.
 
  • #162
Remember what Ralph Klein(premier of Alberta) said about what farmers should do with cows who have BSE - "shot, shovel and shut up"! Brilliant! simply Brilliant! :smile:

PS.And who said Canadians are boring?
 
Last edited:
  • #163
cepheid said:
Smurf...can you please elaborate on what you meant? I am vehemently against the war in Iraq, and the current Bush administration, and the new trend towards imperialism, and the new phenonmenon of the religious right imposing its doctrine on the populace, and trying to make discriminatory laws that impinge on people's rights. I am also against insulting people needlessly. Finally, I believe in free speech. That's what I was trying to get across in my post. So, if my views are not representative of yours at all, then I guess that means you are:

pro war
pro Bush
pro religious extremism
pro insulting Americans for no good reason
anti free speech.

:confused: Clearly NOT...we share the same views. I was simply advocating keeping an OPEN mind, so that we are not guilty of same arrogance that we accuse Americans of displaying...why are you speaking out against me?

I am:
Anti-Violence
Anti-Bush
Pro-Extremism
Anti-Religious
Pro-Direct Action
Anti-Indirect Action
Anti-Democracy
Anti-'Capitalism'
Pro-Free Market
Anti-Insulting Americans for no good reason
Pro-Good humour
Pro-Criticizing American Economics/Politics
Pro-Human Rights
And in the middle with the whole Freedom of Speech thing.

I think that covers everything.

I didn't think you reflected my views accuratly in your post, so I thought I'd mention that (especially the last paragraph - the one people always remember the most).
 
Last edited:
  • #164
cepheid said:
Dude...I AM Canadian...and the hockey stuff was just in good fun, but it doesn't make you look very intelligent if you say that you'd trade in your freedom for beer...and other stereotypes I was referring to was the incredible display of unity we Canadians put on in this thread...the Quebec guy insults the BC school system and implies that all Albertans are rednecks, and that they must all agree with Republican views by default (nooooo thank you) Next thing he knows, he's being faced with some anti-french statements and being told that no, actually, it's the Quebec students who are dumb...sheesh! Then there's the Toronto guy who seems bent on proving our superiority to Americans in every possible way, thus perpetuating the embarassing fact that a large part of our national pride stems from the fact that we are *not* like Americans...we don't have enough of a national identity to state what we are, but only what we are not? You see what I meant now...we were perpetuating all of the stererotypes about each other. I just think we didn't come across as very intelligent refined, or enlightened, despite our claims to the contrary.

I think you worry too much about your image. I don't think I have ever flat out insulted someone for no reason (and I'm very sorry if I have). If someone's going to judge Canadians by the way they talk on a forum then they can do that, I don't care if one more person thinks we are all dumbasses living in igloos, god knows there's plenty of them already.
 
  • #165
^^^Smurf you make an excellent point there. Maybe its time I stopped derailing the thread further. However, I still do not understand what it is about my last paragraph that you so disagree with. Isn't that the one in which I gave that quote about defending people's rights to free speech? Or was it the part where I mentioned Bush's reign of fear? Oh well, whatever it was, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. :smile:

Edit...D'OH!...now I see it...It was probably the part about how I said Canadians have a "whopping inferiority complex". That was harsh...and is itself a stereotype. Indeed I have been overly critical about my fellow Canadians here...I hope there are no hard feelings guys. revelator..my comments were not directed right at you, or any specific "Toronto guy". I was just trying to convey my impressions, but I see now that I jumped to conclusions, mistaking honest discussion for disparaging remarks.

Whoever was planning on moving here...do you still want to after all of our antics? :wink: (juuuust kidding...chill)
 
  • #166
Please continue. I couldn't ask for a better way to get some perspective.
 
  • #167
I've got a question about Canada:

I hear lots of people talking about a "minority government" in Canada. What the hell is that about?
 
  • #168
wasteofo2 said:
I've got a question about Canada:

I hear lots of people talking about a "minority government" in Canada. What the hell is that about?

The Liberals, who are in power, have less than 50% of the MPs in the House.

More than 50% -> Majority Government.
Less than 50% -> Minority Government.

I don't know exactly how it impacts what goes on but it just means the Government is less powerful and can't do as much. Or it needs another party to form a coalition (easier said than done) to become a Government with Majority powers.

What exactly those Majority powers are I can't tell you.
 
  • #169
Is there a party that has a greater % of MP's (I'm assuming this means Representative of some sort...) than the Liberals, or do the Liberals have the greatest %? Is it something like the Liberals have 45%, the Conservatives have 30%, the Mooses have 15% and the Beavers have 10%?

Do you guys have General Elections for a chief executive officer (like our President), or is he decided in some other manner (like voted on by representatives or something)?
 
  • #170
Waste,

Here’s some election results from the last election, in case you’re interested.
http://www.elections.ca/pas/38e/38official.pdf

Yes, as of right now the Liberals have the most seats, followed by the Conservative Party, the Bloc Quebecois and the NDP. However, the Liberal’s do not have a majority of the seats, so they cannot get things passed without support from other parties. This is called a minority gov't.

The country is divided into 301 electoral districts and the people (Members of Paliment) vote for which they want to represent their district in Parliament. The leader of the party with the greatest number of seats is Prime Minister. The PM is the head of government while the Queen is the head of state, but she really doesn’t matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #171
So there's no Nation-wide election for a governmental leader?

Ya'll mofo's are a craaaaaaaaaazy bunch...

That'd be like having Bill Frist as our President, what a scary thought...

I can't imagine having the leader of my country being a guy who got elected by one small section of the country, and only has to convince a few dozen people to like him to get to the highest position of power. Plus, it seems like the only people who get to be the Prime Minister are people in the Parliment, right? Is there any way for local governors or anything to become PM? Also, what actual powers does the PM of Canada have?
 
Last edited:
  • #172
It’s not a silly system. In fact, it’s pretty similar to how your electoral college works except each electoral district is worth the same and there are 251 more of them.
As for not directly voting for the Prime Minister, it doesn’t bother me, nor does it bother most Canadians I think. Provincial "premiers" can become PM, but they'd have to switch to federal politics. I'm not sure how many premiers have been PMs. I don't think that many. But yeah, at the Provincial level, the government works almost the same as at the federal level. The Premier is the one who's party has the most seats in that province.

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Prime-Minister-of-Canada here’s a good article about what a Canadian PM is and what he/she can and can’t do.
 
  • #173
cepheid said:
Edit...D'OH!...now I see it...It was probably the part about how I said Canadians have a "whopping inferiority complex". That was harsh...and is itself a stereotype. Indeed I have been overly critical about my fellow Canadians here...I hope there are no hard feelings guys. revelator..my comments were not directed right at you, or any specific "Toronto guy". I was just trying to convey my impressions, but I see now that I jumped to conclusions, mistaking honest discussion for disparaging remarks

No worries dude!

This is a little off topic, but I recall reading about comments made by Paul Celucci regarding our decriminilization of marijuana. Apparently, if we keep on going in this direction, the US administration is going to need to have even more delays at the border, so that the young'ns won't be smuggling pot into the states.

This is apparently a direct quote.

Paul Celucci said:
"Why, when we're trying to take pressure off the border, would Canada pass a law that would put pressure on the border?" he asked.

I figure, because it's more important to not give our teenagers and other citizens a criminal record over something so paltry as minor possession of marijuana. Who knows, maybe more stringent border rules would keep American guns out of here. I for one would sooner have us keeping our dope here, and the guns elsewhere..
 
  • #174
It’s not a silly system.

The minority system is indeed a silly system. It is highly unstable as they last for a very short period. In fact, the average minority government in Canada only lasts about a year and a half. According to Mapleleafweb.com, 1 year, 5 months and 27 days.
 
  • #175
check said:
I'm not sure how many premiers have been PMs. I don't think that many

no provincial premier has ever become prime minister. the closest was robert stanfield (nova scotia) in the 70s sometime; he was leader of the pc party & thay had 2 seats less than the liberals.

re: pot
trudeau was famous for saying "there's no room for te state int he bedrooms of the nation" but the sentence before that says a lot more: "...we're just bringing the laws of the land up to contemporary society i think..." laws are passed to reflect the views of the society, not the other way around, at least if we live in a democracy. & if bush or cellucci or whoever, doesn't like our 21st-century freedoms they can go %^&* themselves; if they don't lead my government they should butt out.
 
Back
Top