What time interval between wave fronts in S and S'?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time interval between wave fronts arriving at observer C' from a moving train, which is 1.0 km long and traveling at 150 km/h. The solution involves using the formula Δt = t(back) - t(front), incorporating the train's speed and the speed of light. Participants clarify that while the train's speed is a small fraction of light speed, special relativity (SR) is not necessary for this scenario. They emphasize understanding the derivation of the formula and the impact of length contraction on the distances involved. The conversation concludes with a reminder that the formula accounts for the distance the train moves while the waves propagate.
Breadsticks
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



1-9: Assume the train is 1.0km long as measured by the observer at C' and is moving at 150km/h. What time interval between the arrival of the wave fronts at C' is measured by the observer at C in S?
media%2F46a%2F46acd9ee-28b9-49f5-81fe-33901a4069ac%2Fphppv6pAB.png


[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution from the manual is Δt=t(back)-t(front)= 500/(c-(150/3.6m/s))-500/(c+(150/3.6m/s))=4.6*10^-13

How can it use the distance it travels in S'? It doesn't travel that distance in S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Breadsticks said:
How can it use the distance it travels in S'? It doesn't travel that distance in S.
The speed of the train is a tiny fraction of the speed of light. No need for SR here.
 
Doc Al said:
The speed of the train is a tiny fraction of the speed of light. No need for SR here.

Thanks for the reply. If the train was moving at a non-negligible fraction of the speed of light, I would then simply find where the waves meet to figure distance for each then use the above procedure with the modified distances?
 
Breadsticks said:
If the train was moving at a non-negligible fraction of the speed of light, I would then simply find where the waves meet to figure distance for each then use the above procedure with the modified distances?
I would use the exact procedure with the only difference being the modified distances (the length of the train in frame S).

Be sure you understand how that formula is derived.
 
Doc Al said:
I would use the exact procedure with the only difference being the modified distances (the length of the train in frame S).

Be sure you understand how that formula is derived.
Right, there would be length contraction but what about the distance the train has moved while the wave is moving?
 
Breadsticks said:
Right, there would be length contraction but what about the distance the train has moved while the wave is moving?
That is covered by the formula you quoted. (Understand how it is derived!)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top