Which Material is Safer for a Swing Safety Pad?

AI Thread Summary
Material 1, with a higher Young's Modulus, is being debated for its effectiveness as a safety pad under a swing compared to Material 2. The discussion centers on the relationship between Young's Modulus, impact force, and kinetic energy absorption. It is suggested that a material with a lower Young's Modulus (Material 2) may absorb kinetic energy more effectively due to its increased deformation during impact. The concept of impulse is highlighted, emphasizing that a longer collision duration can result in a lower average force applied. Ultimately, the choice of material hinges on the balance between impact force absorption and the duration of the collision.
Bogus_Roads
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two different materials are being considered for a safety pad below a swing. Material 1 has a Young's Modulus twice that of Material 2. Which should be chosen?

A. Material 2, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
B. Material 1, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
C. Material 2, because a material with a lower Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.
D. Material 1, because a material with a higher Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.

Homework Equations



(\DeltaL/Lo)*E=F/A.

The Attempt at a Solution


\DeltaL is clearly larger with a smaller YM, but does the mean the length over which the impact force acts is larger. Does that then mean that it's lower impact? I've never even come across the idea of absorption of kinetic energy, and I don't think it's obvious that something that is "squishy" should absorb kinetic energy more quickly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of force in a collision as the change in momentum divided by the amount of time it takes.

Therefore, the longer a collision takes, the less force is applied.
 
How do you know greater length acted over=greater time?
 
It's based upon impulse. It's defined better here than I could do myself, so I'll just quote...

In classical mechanics, an impulse is defined as the integral of a force with respect to time. When a force is applied to a rigid body it changes the momentum of that body. A small force applied for a long time can produce the same momentum change as a large force applied briefly, because it is the product of the force and the time for which it is applied that is important. The impulse is equal to the change of momentum.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top