- #106
Cyrus
- 3,238
- 17
Are you saying eaitng meat is immoral?
Good onecyrusabdollahi said:He should change his name from steve to nut. It would be more befitting.
cyrusabdollahi said:Its ok EVO, the sound you make, MMMMMMMMMMMM eating them, makes it worth it! Crabs are my favorite sea food! I could eat them 24-7! Maryland Crab cakes...yummy.
That emphasized part right there is really just another way of saying that they aren't like us. How does whether they are cognitive or not have anything to do with it? What does cognition have to do with morality except to say that it is easier for a human to empathize or feel a familiarity with a something with a brain than with something that doesn't have one?Dooga Blackrazor said:Plants are not cognitive beings. Nihilism is an excellent philosophy, and I accept that nihilists may choose to eat meat. However, the idea that eating meat is moral is certainly a facade. Meat is just another example of something ingrained in society, but it has not logical basis in morality.
They were screaming and bubbles were coming out of their mouths. I don't care what you call it. It was disturbing enough that I will never cook another live crab.Danger said:The only reason that I'm weighing in is to clarify something for Evo. Crustaceans, and mollusks for that matter, do not 'scream in pain' when immersed in boiling water. What you hear is pressure equalization through seams in the shell, the same as the whistle on a teakettle.
Evo said:They were screaming and bubbles were coming out of their mouths. I don't care what you call it. It was disturbing enough that I will never cook another live crab.
When I read it I used google to try to find a source that explained the "screaming" since I guessed it was something like what Danger explained but I was unable to find anything that even mentioned it.Evo said:That post was from a LONG time ago, it must've gotten to you.
cyrusabdollahi said:AHHAHAAHHA that's funny. Id just wack them with knife to shut up and turn up the heat. You should cook lobster EVO. You get to rip its arms off while its still alive and throw him in the pot to boil without his arms. People are too damn sensitized from thinking their food comes from a can or box, because no one can actually cook anymore.
cyrusabdollahi said:I bet that was the best damn lobster you ever ate too.
Poor Evo. You should stop trying to get her goat or she might lock this thread up.Jelfish said:If you think that's disgusting.. I've seen my dad rip open a live lobster before steaming it. It was still violently writhing to escape in all its slimy lobster-guts glory. Thank goodness for desensitization and super markets!
Could you provide a source to support this assertion please.cyrusabdollahi said:Its because they go on the news and say they are going to kill people and burn down companies that have anything to do with harming animals. COO--COO--COOO--COOO. Sorry spacetiger, but there crackpots, and there's no two ways around it.
No that is vengeance. Justice would be to make those harmed whole again which is impossible in the case of murder.cyrusabdollahi said:Yep, that is justice. He had a court hearing. He was found guilty of killing a family, he showed no remorse, and so he was punished to death. That is what's called justice, as opposed to what you want, which is revenge. And what I brought up is exactly PETA's philosophy and is on topic.
To kill a creature that loves life as much as you, simply to satisfy your own gluttony is immoral, there is no two ways around it.cyrusabdollahi said:NOPE! Its no eating animals or your a MURDERER! like i said, crackpots.
Since most grain is fed to animals raised for human consumption, your statement is erroneous.Bladibla said:MORE animals will die due to people taking on a vegan diet, and yet you say the animal right activist will choose a vegan diet EVEN as they know they are killing more animals?
I would suggest you read the most extensive human nutritional study ever conducted, "The China Study". Humans do not need to eat meat, in fact eating meat is responsible for the majority of disease in humans, especially the affluent. Cancer, diabetes, and heart disease are all diseases of affluence.Livingod said:I am against animal suffering as well, but we as human beings need meat to live. If babies grow up the PeTA way, we'll be looking at a higher infant morality rate. The USDA did not make the food pyramid just for show.
Would you eat a dead baby? It would taste really good. Why bury your grandparents when they die? Just grind them up and make sausages, that you can eat on special occasions to remember them by.cyrusabdollahi said:Who cares, it tastes good. I'd shoot a cow in the head and eat it, without hesistation. Painless death, and good food! Yummy. Yeah the cow will die, so sad... Hes not a pet cow. I don't really care if he's dead to be honest. I just care that he tastes good, and his skin makes good leather.
We can eat plants without killing them. In fact the Jains do not eat roots for this very reason.TheStatutoryApe said:I think that this whole moral issue arises merely from a sense of familiarity with living things that are more similar to us than others. Plants are just as much living "breathing" life forms as any other. I don't see why they are ok to eat and other living things aren't. Plants have no more "desire" to be eaten than anything else does and have evolved means of protecting themselves from being "killed" just like every other life form.
So what is the morality behind eating only plants? They aren't like us and they can't run away so it's better?
yescyrusabdollahi said:Are you saying eaitng meat is immoral?
How do you know?cyrusabdollahi said:Eating meat is moral Ape. Didn't Jesus make meat (Fish) for his people? I guess he thinks Jesus is immoral too...
Would you eat a dead baby? It would taste really good. Why bury your grandparents when they die? Just grind them up and make sausages, that you can eat on special occasions to remember them by.
But I am serious. And curious.cyrusabdollahi said:That kind of nonsense makes me not take you seriously, so, back to making jokes with Jelfish! I have no problem slaughtering animals for food. None at all. I don't care if its not healthy, I don't care about a china report. I will continue to eat my meat. If all the supermarkets shut down, I would raise animals and slaughter them myself for meat. I love meat that much.
Skyhunter said:To kill a creature that loves life as much as you, simply to satisfy your own gluttony is immoral, there is no two ways around it.
If I were starving, I would eat anything to stay alive. I would even kill it first. However, I live in the land of plenty. Abundance is everywhere. I eat only plants, since they are the optimal fuel for my body. I eat very little in the way of grains, since they are not particularly nutritious.Jelfish said:I think that morality is often times a luxury. For example, if a man were to kill a cow because he was starving and had no other immediate food source, would that be an issue of morality? When a person goes through the weekly chore of food shoping at a huge super market and picks up a package of generic chicken breast, is she willfully invoking her moral fibre? If not, then how is it an issue of morality? This goes back to the example of animals being killed in grain harvesting. Wouldn't an aware moral person then abstain from all such products as well? There comes a point when this moral standard interfers with the human (and animal) desire for self preservation. That's why I don't think it's not particularly sensical to become a vegan for purely moral reasons.
Skyhunter said:But I am serious. And curious.
Do you have a moral problem with eating a dead human?
If so. Why?
Stupid is as stupid does.cyrusabdollahi said:Then your question is stupid and not worthy of a reply.
What, he's after my goat now?TheStatutoryApe said:Poor Evo. You should stop trying to get her goat or she might lock this thread up.