Why does my LC circuit not oscillate its energy between Electric & Magnetic fields?

  • #36
James2018 said:
Can this circuit sustain LC oscillations?
Probably not.
Without a circuit diagram, it is impossible to know.
Where did you find the 1000 MHz quartz oscillator? What part number?

You wanted to watch the compass change direction.
There appears to be no compass in the blurry picture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Baluncore said:
Probably not.
Without a circuit diagram, it is impossible to know.
Where did you find the 1000 MHz quartz oscillator? What part number?

You wanted to watch the compass change direction.
There appears to be no compass in the blurry picture.
The radio antenna in AM makes a beep when I place it over the circuit. A 793 Hz beep can be heard on top of the static noise. And the beep disappears when I move the antenna away.
beep2.png

beep.png

Sorry my mistake, it is a 4.194304 MHz quartz oscillator, so it resonates at 4 MHz.

No, I did not include the compass because I made the coil small enough to have the right inductance to resonate to 4 MHz
 
Last edited:
  • #38
The idea is that the inductor is connected to the collector terminal of the transistor then to the positive terminal of the battery.

You connect a resistor to the base of the transistor, then the quartz crystal then the capacitor then connect to the negative terminal of the battery.

The emitter terminal of the transistor is directly connected to the negative terminal of the battery.

So you have two wires to the negative terminal of the battery (from emitter and base) and one wire (from the inductor which is connected to the collector) to the positive terminal of the battery.
 
  • #39
James2018 said:
The idea is that the capacitor is connected in series to the base terminal of the PNP transistor while the inductor is connected to the collector terminal of the transistor. And first you connect a resistor to the base of the transistor, then the quartz crystal then the capacitor. the emitter is directly connected to the negative terminal.
The idea is that you provide a circuit diagram.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and SammyS
  • #40
Baluncore said:
The idea is that you provide a circuit diagram.
diagram.png
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #41
So the usual radio AM noise spectrum that sounds like white noise to my ears:
nobeep.png


And its modification due to the presence of my circuit:

beep.png

This is the second time I do the measurement and I find the same 793 Hz sound spike in the radio speaker. It sounds like a beep in my ears.
beep2.png
 
  • #42
James2018 said:
There is no base current, so the transistor will not turn on, and the circuit will not oscillate.
 
  • #43
That is a quartz crystal, not an oscillator. It won't do much by itself.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and berkeman
  • #44
Baluncore said:
There is no base current, so the transistor will not turn on, and the circuit will not oscillate.
You are free to add to the circuit diagram if you want. I connected the base terminal and the emitter to the negative battery terminal and the collector to the positive one. I do not know what else to do.
My inspiration was the common-base Colpitts circuit. The inductor L and the series combination of C1 and C2 form the resonant tank circuit, which determines the frequency of the oscillator. The voltage across C2 is applied to the base-emitter junction of the transistor, as feedback to create oscillations.
Cb_colp.svg.png




https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colpitts_oscillator

Maybe the beep on the radio antenna is from other circuits found in my room.
 

Attachments

  • Cc_colp2.svg.png
    Cc_colp2.svg.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 10
  • #46
Baluncore said:
You got a diagram with a simplified bias circuit.
At the bottom of this section is one with the bias circuit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colpitts_oscillator#Theory
But the multimeter measures 2 Volts (sort of a varying value between 1.96 and 2.2 volts) at the terminals of the quartz crystal. And, there is a beep when I place the radio receiver antenna on top of the quartz crystal. I moved the circuit away from other circuits on my terrace and the beep is still heard on the radio when the antenna is on top of the crystal and not heard when the radio receiver antenna is moved away.

Remember, the base of the transistor and the emitter are connected using different wires to the negative terminal of the battery, while the collector is connected to the positive terminal.

Still, I am going to dissasemble it and build it differently to make sure it works.
 
Last edited:
  • Skeptical
Likes davenn
  • #47
I followed this Collpits oscillator diagram
diagram2.png


which resulted in this circuit

IMG_20240921_161646.jpg


Still it is unclear, which terminal of the battery is positive and which is negative in the diagram, I assumed the top terminal is positive.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes davenn and Dale
  • #48
This thread has gone all the way from "why doesn't my compass needle move?" to "what exactly am I hearing on the radio?" Multiple circuits - some of which appear not to be circuits - have been drawn.

It would be valuable of a) the OP were to explain what the question is NOW, so we can get past what the question WAS, and b) to tell us where this random walk is trying to get to.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #49
Ok, how do I know if the circuit oscillates with LC oscillations or not? Do I need to set the radio receiver on a specific frequency on AM and FM? And inside the final diagram that has B1 as the 5 V battery with the top terminal positive and bottom terminal negative, there are two capacitors in the tank circuit connected in series, instead of one...

I did not use the values specified in the diagram... only the arrangement of circuit elements.

Instead I used 15 nanoFarads for the C2 capacitor and 220 nanoFarads for the C5 capacitor connected in series with 470 microHenries L1 inductor in the tank circuit... how do I calculate the resonant frequency with two capacitors connected in series to each other and to an inductor?

diagram2.png
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #50
James2018 said:
how do I calculate the resonant frequency with two capacitors connected in series to each other and to an inductor?

Use the formula for 2 capacitors in series to get the resonant circuit capacitance.

Source (Tietze-Schenk):

PF-Colpitts.png
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #51
Baluncore said:
I remember a similar experiment that I tried, which failed. Anyone who attempts an experiment like this, and questions the result, deserves every support. All the indications are, that they have the critical thinking skills needed, to make a great engineer or physicist one day.
To get a good result for this sort of 'obvious' phenomenon, you need the experience to make the right sort of guesses about what frequency to use, what inductor to use and how to display the result. That calls for a fair bit of experience or enthusiasm wanes before getting a decent result. (And a large source / choice of component values.) Plus you need the appropriate measuring equipment. A DVM makes things very difficult.

I (also) remember a similar play I had - that time with coupled LC oscillators which passed energy between them and back again (analogue of the two pendulums experiment). The main thing was to find suitable audio frequency inductors and appropriate coupling. The (successful) result was two strings of beads on two scope traces, which started with an impulse (switch off the DC supply) and gradually decayed. It lasted just long enough to satisfy me and impress colleagues who would also have done the same thing, given the time and inclination.
 
  • #52
James2018 said:
I did not use the values specified in the diagram... only the arrangement of circuit elements.
That circuit, with your changed values, will oscillate at about 63 kHz.
What frequency do you want ?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Dale
  • #53
James2018 said:
Ok, how do I know if the circuit oscillates with LC oscillations or not?
Do not try to build an oscillator that runs at radio frequencies. Start with audio which a cheap voltmeter is able to measure.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and sophiecentaur
  • #54
So C=Ca*Cb/(Ca+Cb) =(15*220) /(15+220) =14.0425 nF
The resonant frequency is f=1/(2*pi*sqrt{L*C}) = 61.951 KHz so approximately 62 KHz.
Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star
  • #55
James2018 said:
So C=Ca*Cb/(Ca+Cb) =(15*220) /(15+220) =14.0425 nF
The resonant frequency is f=1/(2*pi*sqrt{L*C}) = 61.951 KHz so approximately 62 KHz.
Thank you
That result is correct.

I propose that you use the next time for better readability LaTeX for formulas (see link to a LaTeX Guide below the input window and have esecially a look at chapter "Delimiting your LaTeX code").

In the middle term of your first formula, the unit ##nF## is missing.
 
Last edited:
  • #56
Averagesupernova said:
Do not try to build an oscillator that runs at radio frequencies. Start with audio which a cheap voltmeter is able to measure.
Also bear in mind the old adage "Amplifiers oscillate and oscillators amplify"
Modern transistors (since 1955) can have an embarrassing amount of gain at high frequencies. They will 'see' signals, fed back from long bits of circuit wiring and wires laying close to each other and decide to oscillate many octaves above what you wanted. Short leads and a ground plane are not always available on a breadboard.
 
  • #57
sophiecentaur said:
"Amplifiers oscillate and oscillators amplify"
There are many oscillators named after hopeful amplifier inventors, those who failed to tame positive feedback. Those oscillators are never simple, as they always have a subtle feedback mechanism. I would list some here, in a "rogues gallery", but that would not be fair, as I would probably forget to mention a dozen or more.

There are very few amplifiers named after their inventors. Can you name three?
 
  • #58
Video about a Colpitts oscillator with practical hints:

 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #59
The multimeter detects the resulting output as being a voltage that oscillates between + 120 milliVolts and -120 milliVolts, far lower than the input 9 Volts, although the current from the battery reaches 7 milliAmperes. And I did use the capacitance values from the diagram, four 0,1 microfarads capacitors and one 1 microfarad capacitor.

The only thing I didn't follow was the resistance values, as I didn't find resistors for sale with these exact values: 2.2KΩ, 4.7KΩ, 10KΩ and 560 Ω.

Also I did use a 1.35 microhenries inductor to obtain a resonant frequency of 612,6 KHz for the tank circuit, given the effective capacitance of 50 nF.
 
Last edited:
  • #61
Sagittarius A-Star said:
What is the AC frequency response of your multimeter?

See
https://electronics.stackexchange.c...-a-dmm-decrease-as-the-frequency-is-increased
It's not that, but I keep the circuit turned on 24 hours out of 24, the batteries run out. And when I replace with new batteries, the output voltage is 0.23 V AC or so. I know the multimeter does not record the values like an oscilloscope, but the fact that voltage oscillates and changes polarity is a sign that the output current is AC.
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star
  • #62
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star
  • #63
Baluncore said:
There are many oscillators named after hopeful amplifier inventors, those who failed to tame positive feedback. Those oscillators are never simple, as they always have a subtle feedback mechanism. I would list some here, in a "rogues gallery", but that would not be fair, as I would probably forget to mention a dozen or more.

There are very few amplifiers named after their inventors. Can you name three?
Circuits were only named after their inventors in the early days of radio and electronics (Doherty amplifier of the 1930s, e.g., still used today for some high power RF transmitters). Names are rare because many inventors came up with their own fanciful descriptors (Lee de Forest called his triode amplifier valve an Audion tube, Edwin Armstrong called his first amplifier a regenerative amplifier, etc.). Names are rarely attached in modern times as this tradition continues. Charles Townes called his parametric microwave amplifier a maser, for example, and Robert Dicke called his radiometer amplifier a lock-in. And sometimes you can’t attach a single name. The invention of the DC SQUID amplifier was shared by a team of something like six researchers.
 
  • #64
Baluncore said:
So, have you listened to the 612 KHz oscillator with your AM receiver?


Those are E12 standard resistor values.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_series_of_preferred_numbers#E12
Yes
Without circuit at 612 KHz AM the spectrum is
noise.png


With circuit turned on the spectrum is
beep.png


I would say in the presence of the circuit the radio speaker has some frequency spikes at 565, 599, 1217, 1396 regarding the sound spectrum.
 
  • #65
That audio spectrum is next to useless in assessing the RF spectrum.

When tuned to a nearby unmodulated RF oscillator, an AM radio should be almost silent.
Only the oscillator power supply ripple, at double the power frequency, may show in the audio spectrum, but you are using a battery supply, so the audio should be quite silent.

When no carrier signal is present, the AM radio will turn up its Automatic Gain Control, AGC, to amplify the weaker transmissions and atmospheric noise, that should then fill the audio with detail.

I suspect the noise you are seeing in the audio spectrum, is radio interference from the computer you are using to record the audio spectrum. That RFI is dominating the oscillator you have built.

Try it with the computer turned off. See if you can tune to a quiet spot, with the oscillator close to the AM radio antenna. To verify reception, turn the oscillator off and on again.
 
  • #66
Baluncore said:
That audio spectrum is next to useless in assessing the RF spectrum.

When tuned to a nearby unmodulated RF oscillator, an AM radio should be almost silent.
Only the oscillator power supply ripple, at double the power frequency, may show in the audio spectrum, but you are using a battery supply, so the audio should be quite silent.

When no carrier signal is present, the AM radio will turn up its Automatic Gain Control, AGC, to amplify the weaker transmissions and atmospheric noise, that should then fill the audio with detail.

I suspect the noise you are seeing in the audio spectrum, is radio interference from the computer you are using to record the audio spectrum. That RFI is dominating the oscillator you have built.

Try it with the computer turned off. See if you can tune to a quiet spot, with the oscillator close to the AM radio antenna. To verify reception, turn the oscillator off and on again.
The multimeter certainly detects a voltage that oscillates between + 0.1 Volts and - 0.1 Volts at the antenna of my oscillator, although random values in this range at random times because cannot measure continously like an oscilloscope can,
while detecting + 2.5 Volts near the battery terminal. So I guess AC is present.
Perhaps the radio signal is too weak in Watts to be detected by the radio receiver. Perhaps static noise is stronger in Watts.
 
  • #67
James2018 said:
Perhaps the radio signal is too weak in Watts to be detected by the radio receiver. Perhaps static noise is stronger in Watts.
If the oscillator functioned, it would be heard, if the radio was tuned to that frequency.
Try turning off the computer, then find the oscillator with the AM radio.
 
  • #68
Baluncore said:
If the oscillator functioned, it would be heard, if the radio was tuned to that frequency.
Try turning off the computer, then find the oscillator with the AM radio.
I took the computer and the radio receiver to a different room than the oscillator. The computer perturbs the radio receiver with a beep on top of the static noise. My circuit creates a more loud buzzing sound like a bee on the radio receiver. Perhaps my circuit's antenna does not resonate to 612 KHz, perhaps I should use a different antenna length, for only a tone to be heard on the radio receiver.
 
  • #69
James2018 said:
I took the computer and the radio receiver to a different room than the oscillator.
That was a real bad move.
Also, if you hear a buzz from a battery powered oscillator, something is very wrong.

A good AM receiver should have noise across the RF band, except where your AM radio is tuned to the oscillator, as the oscillator there will desensitise the AM receiver, giving you silent audio.

You must turn off the computer and perform the above test with the oscillator close to the AM radio antenna.
 
  • #70
Baluncore said:
That was a real bad move.
Also, if you hear a buzz from a battery powered oscillator, something is very wrong.

A good AM receiver should have noise across the RF band, except where your AM radio is tuned to the oscillator, as the oscillator there will desensitise the AM receiver, giving you silent audio.

You must turn off the computer and perform the above test with the oscillator close to the AM radio antenna.
I found a similar experiment, where a Collpits oscillator is heard on radio at time 4:15 in the video. Perhaps my antenna is not impendance matched. But good news, my multimeter value oscillates even faster in values and polarity than before when I use two 3 V coin batteries on top of each other, giving an input voltage of +5.21 volts and an output AC voltage of between +1.35 and -1.35 Volts.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
825
Replies
5
Views
901
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
7K
Back
Top