- #141
NeoDevin
- 334
- 2
Evo said:Ah, so spying and espionage against the US can only be committed by US citizens. So all of those foreign spies are all make believe.
Generally they would have operated within the US at some point, and are therefore subject to its jurisdiction.
Evo said:Please post your source that says US classified documents are legally open to public view by all other nations and that it is not illegal to possesses such documents. What would be the point to classify documents to keep them out of the hands of other nations?
Never claimed that. Please post your source that the UK has laws against possessing materials classified by the US. To clarify: I'm not, and haven't, claimed that it is legal to possesses these documents, or even necessarily to view them, within the US. What I am claiming, is that the UK or Australia have no laws with respect to documents classified by the US. The point of classifying documents is to prevent people operating within the US from giving them to other nations. Whoever leaked the documents is the criminal, not Assange. The UK almost certainly employs people to spy on the US. These spies are not criminals in the UK.
You seem to be operating under the assumption that US law applies everywhere in the world. It doesn't. The US can apply for extradition (to a country they have an extradition treaty with) assuming that a crime was committed within the jurisdiction of the US. Further, most of the extradition treaties stipulate that the crimes in question cannot be of a political nature. The case against Assange fails on both counts. I sincerely hope that no country would extradite him for this contrived and illegal prosecution.