- #2,766
- 19,761
- 25,759
Wordle 859 4/6
There have been no NY Times Wordle solutions ending O in at least the last week. Yet my attempt that day clearly showed O as the last letter of the solution. So something is amiss.gmax137 said:maybe there's your problem, there?
Does the 'T' in your name stand for 'Time Traveler'?Mister T said:There have been no NY Times Wordle solutions ending O in at least the last week. Yet my attempt that day clearly showed O as the last letter of the solution. So something is amiss.
Fun fact: The Wordle solution on the day the above happened, Oct. 24th, had been: CAUSE. And AMISS was on August 17th! Maybe there is more to that time travel thing than we dare to believe.OmCheeto said:Does the 'T' in your name stand for 'Time Traveler'?
On October 24th you claimed that 'yesterday was August 23rd'.
The Wordle solution for August 23rd was 'VERVE' and the solution on October 23rd was 'TEMPO'.
So the only thing amiss, as far as I can tell, is when you think you are.
ps. Halloween is in 5 days!
Oops. Never mind. I need a new brain. Thanks.OmCheeto said:The Wordle solution for August 23rd was 'VERVE' and the solution on October 23rd was 'TEMPO'.
Noble, noble! And LOSER had already been used.gmax137 said:Wordle 860 2/6
EDIT: a Lucky first word, "LOSER" ha ha
It should be noted that it is not necessarily stupid to omit lettters you know are in the word. Many times it can give more information, allowing you to guarantee a solve where strictly keeping all known letters would not. This is why I don’t like ”hard” mode. It can happen that actually getting letters (which should be positive) reduce your freedom of guessing - making it impossible to guarantee a solution where you would otherwise be able to.gmax137 said:Stupidly tried a word that's missing the "N" from word two
Yes, and it would be a fantastic test to determine the personal risk aversion function (##\sigma (\mu)##). You give up a try, i.e. reduce ##\sigma ## to the expense of ##\mu.##Orodruin said:It should be noted that it is not necessarily stupid to omit lettters you know are in the word. Many times it can give more information, allowing you to guarantee a solve where strictly keeping all known letters would not. This is why I don’t like ”hard” mode. It can happen that actually getting letters (which should be positive) reduce your freedom of guessing - making it impossible to guarantee a solution where you would otherwise be able to.
Yes, I agree. But I have self-imposed the "hard" rules on myself. In this case, my third word leapt out at me, I thought, "oh I know, it is BASIC" and typed it in, not realizing I was not following my own rule. That's what made it stupid, lol.Orodruin said:It should be noted ...
I have two starting words that I will always first and second unless the first gives a lot of information. They cover all vowels and a number of important consonants. I will make my guesses based on the result of that keeping mindful of when there is a necessity to make a guess that cannot be the solution to gain extra information to guarantee success, which I value higher than solving in fewer guesses.gmax137 said:I think it is interesting to find out how other people do these puzzles.
I have a friend who uses that same strategy. I prefer hard mode though. Perhaps it's because I never had an interest in developing my vocabulary during my formative years, so I'm not very good at guessing words or in general playing word games. Wordle is the only word game I ever liked.Orodruin said:It should be noted that it is not necessarily stupid to omit lettters you know are in the word. Many times it can give more information, allowing you to guarantee a solve where strictly keeping all known letters would not. This is why I don’t like ”hard” mode.
I am following a strategy of word elimination which requires having a list of all candidate words on a spreadsheet. My seed is always the same and chosen such that the number of words that have no letters in common with it is minimized. My seed has an exclusion percentage or 91%. This means that only 9% of the words on the list share zero words with the seed and remain viable. The idea is to maximize the probability of catching letters that are shared with the target word because 91% have at least one shared letter. Having zero shared letters, as was the case today, is no setback because the target word belongs to the limited list of 9%.gmax137 said:I think it is interesting to find out how other people do these puzzles.
I assume that is still the largest class of possibilities after the first guess? What is the distribution of classes giving shared results for your seed?kuruman said:The idea is to maximize the probability of catching letters that are shared with the target word because 91% have at least one shared letter. Having zero shared letters, as was the case today, is no setback because the target word belongs to the limited list of 9%.