Work done by a force changing the distance of a satellite's orbit

Click For Summary
To change a satellite's orbit from a radius of 1.81 × 10^7 m to 8.01 × 10^6 m, a net external force must perform work on the satellite. The initial and final orbital speeds were calculated using the formula v = sqrt(G * M_e / r), resulting in speeds of 4695.74 m/s and 7058.74 m/s, respectively. The work done was computed using the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem, yielding a value of approximately 7.68 × 10^10 J. However, there is a concern about whether other forms of energy, besides kinetic energy, should be considered in this calculation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accounting for all energy types when determining the work required for orbital changes.
kmb11132
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5530-kg satellite is in a circular Earth orbit that has a radius of 1.81 × 10^7 m. A net external force must act on the satellite to make it change to a circular orbit that has a radius of 8.01 × 10^6 m. What work must the net external force do?

Homework Equations



Orbital Speed:
v = sqrt( G * M_e / r )
where G is the gravitational constant and M_e is Earth's mass

Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem:
W = K_f - K_i = .5*m*v_f^2 - .5*m*v_i^2

The Attempt at a Solution



v_i = sqrt( 6.674e-11 * 5.98e24kg / 1.81e7m )
v_i = 4695.74m/s

v_f = sqrt( 6.674e-11 * 5.98e24kg / 8.01e6m )
v_f = 7058.74m/s

W = .5*m*v_f^2 - .5*m*v_i^2
W = .5*5530kg*7058.74m/s^2 - .5*5530kg*4695.74m/s^2
W = 7.68002e10J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work = change in energy.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Work = change in energy.

I incorrectly found the work to be the difference between the initial and final kinetic energies above.
 
Are there other forms of energy present?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
889
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K