Linear algebra is the branch of mathematics concerning linear equations such as:
a
1
x
1
+
⋯
+
a
n
x
n
=
b
,
{\displaystyle a_{1}x_{1}+\cdots +a_{n}x_{n}=b,}
linear maps such as:
(
x
1
,
…
,
x
n
)
↦
a
1
x
1
+
⋯
+
a
n
x
n
,
{\displaystyle (x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})\mapsto a_{1}x_{1}+\cdots +a_{n}x_{n},}
and their representations in vector spaces and through matrices.Linear algebra is central to almost all areas of mathematics. For instance, linear algebra is fundamental in modern presentations of geometry, including for defining basic objects such as lines, planes and rotations. Also, functional analysis, a branch of mathematical analysis, may be viewed as the application of linear algebra to spaces of functions.
Linear algebra is also used in most sciences and fields of engineering, because it allows modeling many natural phenomena, and computing efficiently with such models. For nonlinear systems, which cannot be modeled with linear algebra, it is often used for dealing with first-order approximations, using the fact that the differential of a multivariate function at a point is the linear map that best approximates the function near that point.
For this problem,
The solution for (a) is
I am slightly confused for ##p \in W## since I get ##a_3 = 2a_1## and ##a_2 = 2a_0##. Since ##a_3 = 2b##, ##a_2 = 2a##, ##a_1 = b##, ##a_0 = a##.
Anybody have this doubt too?
Kind wishes
The eigenvectors of a hermitian matrix corresponding to unique eigenvalues are orthogonal. This is not too difficult of a statement to prove using mathematical induction. However, this case is seriously bothering me. Why is the dot product of the vectors not rightly zero? Is there something more...
Why are the eigenvectors of this hermitian matrix not checking out as orthogonal? The eigenvalues are certainly distinct. ChatGPT also is miscalculating repeatedly. I have checked my work many times and cannot find the error. Kindly assist.
I'm reading Group Theory by A. Zee , specifically, chapter I.3 on rotations. He used the passive transformation in analyzing a point ##P## in space. There are two observers, one labeled with unprimed coordinates and the other with primed coordinates. From the figure below, he deduced the...
Hi, a doubt about the definition of vector space.
Take for instance the set of polynomals defined on a field ##\mathbb R ## or ##\mathbb C##. One can define the sum of them and the product for a scalar, and check the axioms of vector space are actually fullfilled.
Now the point is: if one...
I was stuck on this problem so I looked for a solution online.
I was able to reproduce the following proof after looking at the proof on the internet. By this I mean, when I wrote it below I understood every step.
However, it is not a very insightful proof. At this point I did not really...
I tried to find the answer to this but so far no luck. I have been thinking of the following:
I generate two random vectors of the same length and assign one of them as the right eigenvector and the other as the left eigenvector.
Can I be sure a matrix exists that has those eigenvectors?
Hello,
I am currently self studying Linear Algebra using MIT lectures and the textbook Introduction to Linear Algebra by professor Gilbert Strang. I'm at the 16th lecture on Projection Matrices and Least squares approximation. The lectures are very informative, but I struggle a lot with...
Suppose ##9## is an eigenvalue of ##T^2##.
Then ##T^2v=9v## for certain vectors in ##V##, namely the eigenvectors of eigenvalue ##9##.
Then
##(T^2-9I)v=0##
##(T+3I)(T-3I)v=0##
There seem to be different ways to go about continuing the reasoning here.
My question will be about the...
Here is one proof
$$\forall u\in U\implies Tu\in U\subset V\implies T^2u\in U\implies \forall m\in\mathbb{N}, T^m\in U\tag{1}$$
Is the statement above actually a proof that ##\forall m\in\mathbb{N}, T^m\in U## or is it just shorthand for "this can be proved by induction"?
In other words, for...
Now, for ##v\in V##, ##(T+I)v=0\implies Tv=-v##. That is, the null space of ##T+I## is formed by eigenvectors of ##T## of eigenvalue ##-1##.
By assumption, there are no such eigenvectors (since ##-1## is not an eigenvalue of ##T##).
Hence, if ##(T-I)v \neq 0## then ##(T+I)(T-I)v\neq 0##...
Question:
Let ##\sigma\in S_n## be a permutation and ##T_{\sigma}## be the matrix we obtain from ##I## by appling ##\sigma## on the raws of ##I## (I.e ##\sigma## acts on the rows of ##I##) . Then:
1. ##\det(T_{\sigma}) = sgn(\sigma) ##
and 2. ##T_{\sigma} T_{\tau} =T_{\sigma\circ \tau}##, for...
I've solved this problem using a fairly involved technique, where I compute the matrix ##e^{tA}## (the fundamental matrix of the system) with a method derived from the Cayley-Hamilton's theorem. It is a cool method that I believe always works, but it can be a lot of work sometimes. It involves...
In fact, it WAS a homework couple of years ago, and I've solved it, kind of (below). I still would like to find a cleaner solution.
Here is what I did.
Let's say, the apples are labeled, and their weights are ##x_1, x_2, ...##. He takes out the apple #1 and finds that, e.g., ##x_2+x_5+x_9+... =...
Hello,
I need some advice because I just can't figure out how to solve the problem. I could try to make the determinant triangular by adding all the b together, but that doen't seem a good way of solving the problem. Is there any direction I should be thinking of?
Thanks
This is problem 28 from chapter 3F "Duality" of Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right, third edition.
I spent quite a long time on this problem, like a few hours. Since there is no available solution, I am wondering if my solution is correct.
One assumption in this problem is that...
My question is about item (b).
(b)
Here is what I drew up to try to visualize the result to be proved
The general idea, I think, is that
1) ##(\text{null}\ T)^0## and ##\text{range}\ T'## are both subspaces of ##V'=L(V,\mathbb{F})##.
2) We can show that they have the same dimension.
3)We...
I will use a proof by cases.
Case 1: dim V = dim W
Then ##T=T|_V## is an isomorphism of ##V## onto ##W##. The reason for this is that it is possible to prove that if ##T## is surjective, which it is, then it is also injective and so it is invertible (hence an isomorphism).
Case 2: dim V < dim...
I was stuck when I started writing this question. I think I solved the problem in the course of writing this post.
My solution is as follows:
Consider any basis ##B## of ##V## that includes ##v##: ##(v, v_2, ..., v_n)##.
##L(V,W)##, where ##\dim{(V)}=n## and ##\dim{(W)}=m## is isomorphic with...
The Math challenge threads have returned!
Rules:
1. You may use google to look for anything except the actual problems themselves (or very close relatives).
2. Do not cite theorems that trivialize the problem you're solving.
3. Do not solve problems that are way below your level. Some problems...
The trace of the sigma should be the same in both new and old basis. But I get a different one. Really appreciate for the help.
I’ll put the screen shot in the comment part
Let $$ X \in R^{m*n} $$ where m=n with rank(X)<m then there is at-least one equation which can be written as a linear combination of other equations. Let $$ \beta \in R^{n} $$.
$$ X\beta=y $$
Suppose we have x<m independent equations (the equations are consistent) formed by taking the dot...
Here is an example of the decomposition for a 2 x 2 matrix
We have ##2^2=4## determinants, each with only #n=2# non-automatically-zero entries. By "non-automatically-zero" I just mean that they aren't zero by default. Of course, any of ##a,b,c##, or ##d## can be zero, but that depends on the...
TL;DR Summary: we are given a set of coefficient matrices (shown below) and we need to determine whether they are in REF, RREF, or neither.
Hello! I am having a lot of trouble identifying these matrices, and using the criteria checklist is not helping very much. Here is what I am working with...
\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 4 & 6 \\
3 & 5 & 8 \\
1 & 2 & 3
\end{pmatrix}
Using the row operations, R2<-- R2-3R1 R3<-- R3-R1 we find the row echelon form of the matrix.
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 3 \\
0 & -1 & -1 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}
Based on the definition of row space in the book Í am...
It would be nice if someone could find the history of why we use the letters i and j or m and n for the basics when working with Matrices ( A = [aij]mxn ). I tried looking up the information and I was not successful. I understand what they represent in the context of the matter, but not why they...
In classical mechanics, it seems like solving force equations are a question of finding a solvable system of equations that accounts for all existing forces and masses in question. Therefore, I'm curious if this can be mixed with reinforcement learning to create a game and reward function...
...Out of interest am trying to go through the attached notes,
My interest is on the highlighted, i know that in
##\mathbb{z}/\mathbb{6z}## under multiplication we shall have:
##1*1=1##
##5*5=1## am assuming that how they have the ##(\mathbb{z}/\mathbb{6z})^{*}={1,5}## is that correct...
I'm used to seeing commutative diagrams where the vertices are mathematical objects and the edges (arrows) are mappings between them. Can the diagram ( from the interesting article https://people.reed.edu/~jerry/332/25jordan.pdf ) in the attached photo be interpreted that way?
In the...
My question is motivated by the proof of TH 5.13 on p 84 in the 2nd edition of Linear Algebra Done Right. (This proof differs from that in the 4th ed - online at: https://linear.axler.net/index.html chapter 5 )
In the proof we arrive at the following situation:
##T## is a linear operator on a...
I am intending to join an undergrad course in physics(actually it is an integrated masters course equivalent to bs+ms) in 1-1.5 months. The thing is, in order to take a dive into more advanced stuff during my course, I am currently studying some of the stuff that will be taught in the first...
Welcome to the reinstatement of the monthly math challenge threads!
Rules:
1. You may use google to look for anything except the actual problems themselves (or very close relatives).
2. Do not cite theorems that trivialize the problem you're solving.
3. Have fun!
1. (solved by...
For exercise 3 (2),
,
The solution for finding the eigenvector is,
However, I am very confused how they got from the first matrix on the left to the one below and what allows them to do that. Can someone please explain in simple terms what happened here?
Many Thanks!
Thread moved from technical math section, so there is no homework template.
(∀λ∃ℝ)
-x + y - z = 1
-2x + 10y + (2λ + 6) = 6
3x + 11y + (λ2+6)z = 5λ - 1
after gaussian elimination I have this:
-1 4 -2 | 1
0 1 λ | 2
0 0 λ(λ-1) | 5λ
So, for λ=0 ⇒ ∞ solutions, for λ=1...
Assume a table A(3x3) with the following:
A [ 1 2 1 ]^T = 6 [ 1 2 1 ]^T
A [ 1 -1 1 ]^T = 3 [ 1 -1 1 ]^T
A [ 2 -1 0]^T = 3 [ 1 -1 1]^T
Find the Eigenvalues and eigenvectors:
I have in mind to start with the Av=λv or det(A-λI)v=0....
Also, the first 2 equations seems to have the form Av=λv...
Using the QR decomposition (the complex version) I want to prove that ##SL_2(C)## is homeomorphic to the product ##SU(2) × T## where ##T## is the set of upper-triangular 2×2-complex matrices with real positive entries at the diagonal. Deduce that ##SL(2, C)## is simply-connect.
So, I can define...
Hello. I am currently doing a high school univariate calculus book, but I would like to go through Apostol's two volumes to get a strong foundation in calculus. His first volume seems great, and I've heard great things about his series, but I am not sure if his second volume contains sufficient...
The published solutions indicate that the nullspace is a plane in R^n. Why isn't the nullspace an n-1 dimensional space within R^n? For example, if I understand things correctly, the 1x2 matrix [1 2] would have a nullspace represented by any linear combination of the vector (-2,1), which...
The usual theorem is talking about the linear operator being restricted to an invariant subspace:
I had no problem understanding its proof, it appears here for example: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3386595/restriction-operator-t-w-is-diagonalizable-if-t-is-diagonalizable However, I...
The classical "power method" for solving one special eigenvalue of an operator works, in a finite-dimensional vector space, as follows: suppose an operator ##\hat{A}## can be written as an ##n\times n## matrix, and its unknown eigenvectors are (in Dirac bra-ket notation) ##\left|\psi_1...
Hi,
If ##|a\rangle## is an eigenvector of the operator ##A##, I know that for any scalar ##c \neq 0## , ##c|a\rangle## is also an eigenvector of ##A##
Now, is the ket ##F(B)|a\rangle## an eigenvector of ##A##? Where ##B## is an operator and ##F(B)## a function of ##B##.
Is there way to show...
So, I've been watching eigenchris's video series "Tensors for Beginners" on YouTube. I am currently on video 14. I, in the position of a complete beginner, am taking notes on it, and I just wanted to make sure I wasn't misinterpreting anything.
At about 5:50, he states that "The array for Q is...
So, I've been watching eigenchris's video series "Tensors for Beginners" on YouTube. I am currently on video 14. I am a complete beginner and just want some clarification on if I'm truly understanding the material.
Basically, is everything below this correct?
In summary of the derivation of the...
I refer to the video of this page, where there is a description of Galilean relativity that is meant to be an introduction to SR, making the comprehension of the latter easier as a smooth evolution from the former.
All the series is in my opinion excellent, but I think that this aspect is...