I am to produce a research presentation for a class of Masters' physics students on the casimir force, going via a detailed treatment of the vacuum effects in conducting cavities, going on to explain some real phenomena and applications. What I am after is a good introductory text on quantum...
Homework Statement
A. Zee Quantum Field theory in a nutshell, p. 31. There is painfully little explanation on this page.
I'm okay with the action:
S(A) = \int d^4 x \mathcal{L} = \int d^4 x\{ \frac{1}{2}A_\mu [(\partial^2 +m^2)g^{\mu \nu}-\partial^\mu\partial^\nu]A_\nu + A_\mu J^\mu \}...
Quantum field theory or particle physics what first?
Hi at present I am confused whether i should try obtining a firm conceptual understanding of QFT before jumping to particle physics or whether aa very brief overview of QFT is enough ?
Since I'm very interested in General Relativity and Quantum field theory, I'd like to start a doctoral program abroad after my master study (I'm studying in Switzerland and will get my master degree in approximately 1.5 years).
I was surfing around in the internet and found for example the...
I was wondering what to read for quantum field theory and in what order if applicable: I have "qft in a nutshell" by zee, "intro to qft" by peskin, "qft" by rydern, and "advanced qft" by sakurai.
Hi,
I am curious about the following and I aim these questions to the people who do general relativity and uantum field theory over there.
What is the difference between field theory of general relativity and field theory of quantum field theory? Is the former only for study of gravitation...
I was wondering if anybody knew any good books that give an easy to understand quantum field theory. I am talking from a view point of a person who has read the third volume of the feynman lectures and quantum mechanics demystified. if this is not enough to even start a easy to understand...
I know that the vacuum in Quantum Field theory is not empty, but sometimes I find some people say that the particles are created from nothing because they are created from the vacuum , are those people expression a misleading?
On this forum, quantum field theory (QFT) is a part of this subforum (Quantum Physics), while particle physics is a subject of another forum. These two topics - QFT and particle physics - are clearly separated.
On the other hand, most textbooks on QFT are also textbooks on particle physics...
In my recent paper
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0705.3542
entitled
"Is quantum field theory a genuine quantum theory? Foundational insights on particles and strings"
I argue the following:
Practically measurable quantities resulting from quantum field theory are not described by hermitian...
http://sites.google.com/site/winitzki/" a draft of an introductory textbook on quantum field theory in curved spacetime - free quantum fields in expanding universe, Unruh effect, Hawking radiation, also Casimir effect and some basic stuff on path integrals and effective action. The book is not...
I don't understand how Peskin & Schroeder can evaluate the integral on page 27 by having the real axis wrapping around branch cuts just like that. The picture of the contours are on page 28.
Hi all. I'm running a thread in the Philosophy section about rules of the universe etc but I'm stuck on a fundamental question which probably only a current quantum mechanics expert can answer.
In essence do the most current iterations of QF theory maintain that the ultimate and irreducible...
Hi,there! I want to study Quantum Field Theory but I don't know what book to use! I have a rather good background in quantum mechanics and electrodynamics, and I probably can gain access on the following books:
Brown L.S. : "Quantum Field Theory"
Peskin and Schroeder : "Introduction to Quantum...
I'm interested in teaching myself QFT. My BSc is in Mathematics and Physics, so I probably have a stronger mathematical background than the average physics graduate.
However, I'm assuming it's almost certainly not good enough.
What I am looking for is a way of sensibly teaching myself the...
U = e^{\frac{1}{2} B} = \cos(\frac{1}{2} \theta) + b \sin(\frac{1}{2} \theta)
we can then write:
U = e^{\frac{1}{2} \theta b} = \cos(\frac{1}{2} \theta) + b \sin(\frac{1}{2} \theta)
And if we rely on Joe's expression, r=\frac{\theta}{2} (rotor angle is always half the rotation):
U = e^{br}...
Let be the nuclear reaction:
ee \rightarrow e+e+ (if not possible a similar one)
Of course we have 2 states |A> with 2 electrons and |B> with two "positrons"..if we wished to compute the transition probability we should know:
<B|S|A> where "S" is the S-Matrix..my question is..is...
As I read in my quantum mechanics book the delta function is sometimes called the sampling function because it samples the value of the function at one point.
\int {\delta (x - x')} f(x')dx' = f(x)
But then I opened a quantum field book and I found equations like that:
\phi (x) =...
if we know that the divergent series in perturbation theory of quantum field theory goes in the form:
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)g^{n}\epsilon^{-n} with
\epsilon\rightarrow{0}
then ..how would we apply the renormalization procedure to eliminate the divergences and obtain finite...
Hi, I'm a little confused about the nature of fields in quantum field theory. I sometimes see people make reference to an "electron field" or other matter field of some sort, and in my understanding, in quantum field theory, ALL the different fundamental particles can be represented as...
Can anybody recommend some good quantum field theory books for introduction to the subject? I am already familiar with some of the techniques from applications to statistical mechanics, but I would like to see them in a different context.
Greetings--I have a few questions from An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Peskin and Schroeder.
Note: I'm not sure how to construct the contraction symbol using \LaTeX, so instead I will use the following cumbersome convention: \overbrace{\psi(x)\overline{\psi(y)}}=S_F(x-y), they...
At my physics faculty there is this magazine that comes out once every three months. I wrote an article about GR for it. Introducing not only the concepts but also some mathematics. I explained the field equations and derived some implications of the Schwarzschild metric. I could do this because...
Hello All,
Hendrik van Hees just started a qft course. Here's his announcement:
We just started an online qft theory course, reading along Zee's
textbook. Soon, it will be provided as a an online course at the
supersymmetry web page:
http://www.superstringtheory.com/
Since the...
One question has disturbed me long time, I don't know the distinction between quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory.
By the way, which quantum field theory or quantum electrodynamics textbook is prefer?
In short, the question is, how is the position operator related to the position-parameters of a quantum field ψ(x)?
For instance, consider a quantum-mechanical state of two particles |Ψ>. This can be expanded in terms of the position eigenstates |x1,x2> to give the position representation...
I noticed that some copies of this book are available at Amazon for as low as $13.00, and increbible price. I just ordered a copy for my self. If anyone else is interested, they are here:
The propagation of something, photon or particle, can have many possible paths, thus the Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics. The initial position is relatively fixed and the final position is relatively fixed (compared to all of space). But it's path from beginning to end can...
Does anyony know of a good, cheap (Perhaps Free :biggrin: ) book that will teach me the basics of quantum field theory. I am a very new beginner, so I will need something simple please.
thanks.
could anyone suggest a good quantum field theory text?
i mean a text for a beginner who is familiar with basic quantum mechanics...also, since i am going to study it by myself( i am not taking a physics course ), a text that is simple in language and informal would be great.(i mean, like...
Greetings,
I have question regarding the mathematica foundations of QFT. As I understand, the "regular" QM (Schrödinger, Heisenberg...) been developped so that the math underlying it checks out. Is this the case for QFT, or is the theory still "iffy" at points? I know it works well...
I believe that the Axioms for TQFT were set out by Atiyah
in 1990 and that one of the equivalent definitions of a TQFT is in
category terms: a TQFT is a functor from the category of n-dimensional cobordisms to the category of Hilbert spaces, satisfying certain conditions.
Is anyone familiar...
Let,s suppose we have a Hamiltonian H so we can construct the action by H+dS/dt then why no use the action to solve the problem of quantization of non renormalizable theories?..
Hello everyone!
This is the rebirth of my thread in PF v2.0 entitled "Do you know QM and SR?" Since I started that thread, a 2nd edition of the book (Warren Siegel's Fields) has been released. The url is:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/hep-th/9912205
I'll post some of the more useful comments from...