A Galvanometer of Coil Resistance 50 Ω Deflects Full Scale....

AI Thread Summary
A galvanometer with a coil resistance of 50.0 Ω deflects full scale at 3.50 mA. To construct a voltmeter that deflects full scale for 35.0 V, the required series resistance is calculated using the formula Rv = (Vv/I) - Rg, resulting in Rv = 9,950 Ω. This indicates that the total resistance for the setup would be 10,000 Ω. Feedback from peers confirmed the correctness of the calculations and reasoning. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations in physics problems.
AUAO1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A galvanometer of coil resistance 50.0 Ω deflects full scale for a current of 3.50 mA. What series resistance should be used with this galvanometer to construct a voltmeter which deflects full scale for 35.0 V

Homework Equations

/Known Variables
[/B]
R1 + R2... + Rn = Rtotal
R = V/I
Vv = 35V; Rg = 50 Ω; I = 3.50 mA or 0.0035 A

The Attempt at a Solution


Since a voltmeter occurs in a series, I have used the relevant equation above (Rv + Rg = Rtotal) where Rtotal = Vv/I (since current is constant). Replacing Rtotal with Vv/I gives Rv + Rg = Vv/I, so to find the resistance of the voltmeter, it would be Rv = (Vv/I) - Rg. Substituting the values in gives (35/0.0035) - 50 so Rv = 9,950 Ω (9.95 x 10^3 Ω). This means that Rtotal = 10,000 Ω (1.00 x 10^4 Ω).

Help and feedback is very much appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AUAO1,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Your reasoning and results look good.

They ask for the required resistance to put in series with the galvanometer, which you found to be 9950 Ω. The value of Rtotal wasn't necessary, but it's nice that you calculated it, too.
 
  • Like
Likes AUAO1
Hello and thank you gneill!

Thank you for the quick response and feedback. It's always nice to be sure that I'm on the right track with these questions so your help is much appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top