Changing the frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing magnetorquers for cubesats, specifically the need to simulate the geomagnetic field in the cubesat's frame of reference. The user has geomagnetic field data in Earth's frame and requires it to be transformed to match the cubesat's body frame, which is in normal Cartesian coordinates and is not aligned with Earth's frame. Key questions arise about the relative velocity between the two frames and the alignment of their axes. The user expresses confusion about the necessary calculations for torque in this context. Clarifying these aspects is essential for progressing with the simulation and prototype development.
hamdal
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm currently doing a student project at uni and I'm trying to design magnetorquers for cubesats.Before I make the prototype I need a simulation of what will happen.The problem is that for my calculations,I need to change the frame of reference of the geomagnetic field.So basically I need to go from Earth's frame of reference to the cubesat's frame of reference.I've been researching a lot and I haven't found much.Any suggestions that you might think will help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve, eg whether this is about a velocity boost, a rotation, a change of coordinate type (eg spherical vs Cartesian), or some combination of the above.

What sort of coordinates are you using in the two frames?

Do the two origins have a nonzero relative velocity?

Are the axes of the two frames aligned?
 
andrewkirk said:
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve, eg whether this is about a velocity boost, a rotation, a change of coordinate type (eg spherical vs Cartesian), or some combination of the above.

What sort of coordinates are you using in the two frames?

Do the two origins have a nonzero relative velocity?

Are the axes of the two frames aligned?

Well I have the data for the geomagnetic field but it is in Earth's frame if reference.My magnetorquers are in body frame of reference so if I want to calculate the torque, I need to work in the same frame. Both of them are normal Cartesian coordinates. The are not aligned and the body frame is rotating in a given orbit. Sorry if the details are vague, but I'm so confused myself that I don't know what I should look for.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top