Dawn dead in Ceres orbit, ran out of fuel Oct 2018

  • I
  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fuel Orbit
In summary, the Dawn spacecraft observed Ceres for an hour on Jan. 13, from a distance of 238,000 miles (383,000 kilometres). A little more than half of its surface was observed at a resolution of 27 pixels. This video shows bright and dark features.
  • #596
That looks like a camera effect of over-exposure to me.

Garth
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #597
Ok maybe, I'm not an expert in the field of digital imaging. However the spots seem quite structured anyway. Or are they all processing artefacts?
 
  • #598
Here I tried to highlight a pattern and connect similar pixels.
PIA19630 connect dots.jpg
 
  • #599
That looks better - more 'natural' rather than 'machine generated' and I have no informed idea what those bright areas are but I would hazard a guess as newly exposed ices on the central mound at the centre and on the floor of the crater.

Garth
 
Last edited:
  • #600
Looks like a pure processing artifact. The original picture doesn't have such a structure.
 
  • #601
Mission director Marc Rayman posted a status update today:
==quote==
September 8, 2015 - Third Mapping Cycle Commences Tonight

Dawn is completing transmission to Earth of the pictures and spectra it acquired during its second mapping cycle while orbiting Ceres at an altitude of 915 miles (1,470 kilometers).

The robotic explorer will begin its third mapping cycle at 12:12 a.m. PDT on Sept. 9. During each of its 12 flights over the dayside of Ceres, it will point its camera and spectrometers behind and to its right, providing a third perspective on the landscape for use in developing topographic maps.
==endquote==
You will recall that there are to be 6 mapping cycles. Each cycle involves 12 of the 19 hour orbits, 12 passes over the day side. Each cycle covers the entire surface of Ceres.

On the first cycle the camera was pointed straight down, on the second (just finishing) it was a little back and to the left. On the third it will point a little back and to the right.

For me, the real meat of the mission starts in mid December--three months from now, when Dawn, using gamma and neutron spectroscopy, will actually SMELL which chemical elements make up the surface rubble (to a depth of about one meter) and it will be able to GAUGE the amount of WATER in the surface material by the extent to which the neutrons being emitted have been slowed down ("thermalized") by repeated collisions with hydrogen nuclei.

I'll bring forward the schedule to have it handy:
Code:
Orbit    dates      altitude(km)  pixelsize(m) res/HST  period  soccerball at
RC3    April 23–May 9    (13,600)    (1,300)    24     15 days    (3.0 meters)
Survey    June 6-30      (4,400)      (410)     73     3.1 days    (1.0 meters)
HAMO    Aug 17–Oct 23    (1,470)      (140)     217    19 hours    (33 cm)
LAMO Dec 15–end of mission (375)      (35)      850    5.5 hours    (8.5 cm)
 
Last edited:
  • #602
Again, since we've turned a page, I'll bring forward two diagrams key to understanding the type of information Dawn may be acquiring in the "LAMO" (low altitude mapping orbit) starting in mid December.
gamma.jpg
CerCut.jpg
 
  • #603
What Dawn is doing now, in HAMO, is taking the data needed to construct a TOPOGRAPHICAL map---precisely determining the heights of all the mountains, ridges, ice-mounds, etc. Om has suggested that some of the bumps warts pockmarks and pimples on Ceres could have formed by pressure raised by ice bodies like the PINGOS that form in arctic regions on Earth---but higher due to the low (1/30) gravity.

It's clear that constructing a topographical map is interesting, in part because it will enable a quantitative understanding of the geological processes at work on Ceres. E.g. how did that 5 km high mountain that Rayman refers to as "Mt Lonely" get that high. BTW it has streaks of what looks like ice running down one side. So there are puzzles which point to questions about the internal structure of the planet.

For an overview of what's going on (and incidentally a nice animation of Mt. Lonely seen from many angles) check out Rayman's August journal:
http://dawnblog.jpl.nasa.gov/2015/08/21/dawn-journal-august-21/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #604
mfb said:
No pictures of the bright spots from HAMO orbit so far :(.

New pictures were posted about an hour ago.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA19889
I don't see any squares.
Though William Shatner just tweeted that they've found barbells next to a toaster on Mars.
https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/status/641629127649288192/photo/1

There is also a topographical map of Occator crater, with and without animation.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=pia19891
with color coded elevation



http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=pia19890
black and white

It looks as though my earlier observation about the central peak being higher than the crater wall was was completely wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Dotini
  • #605
Om thanks for the alert! In that release you linked to there was this nice still:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/tiff/PIA19889.tif
I tried to insert it as an image here but got a red-X. However I think it will show up if you click "reply"
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/tiff/PIA19889.tif
The Occator crater with those bright spots, now at much higher resolution.
 
  • #606
marcus said:
...
Can you understand their description of pingo formation?

Did you edit in this question? I don't remember seeing it before.
Anyways, they use a lot of pingo lingo, which I do not understand:
"thermokarst lake" :oldconfused:

Googling "thermokarst" did not help things at all.
It only leads to "karst", which is another jumble of fairly non-descriptive babble.

wiki; "Karst topography is a landscape formed from the dissolution of soluble rocks such as limestone, dolomite, and gypsum. It is characterized by underground drainage systems with sinkholes, dolines:oldconfused:, and caves."
...
"Morphology
The karstification of a landscape may result in a variety of large- or small-scale features both on the surface and beneath. On exposed surfaces, small features may include flutes:oldconfused:, runnels:oldconfused:, clints:oldconfused: and grikes:oldconfused:, collectively called karren:oldconfused: or lapiez:oldconfused:."

Where are our exo-geologists when you need them?
 
  • #607
Where are our exo-geologists when you need them?

They are hiding in their karsts.
 
  • #608
Never known to be patient enough to wait on NASA, Emily Lakdawalla put together some 3D images, and posted them today.

Dawn Ceres image bonanza: Grab your 3D glasses!
Posted By Emily Lakdawalla
2015/09/10 01:04 UTC


Most fascinating for me is the Haulani crater, situated very near both the equator and prime meridian.
Here's a heavily zoomed in image I captured:

Haulani.crater.Ceres.3D.E.Lakdawalla.jpg

Haulani crater, Ceres
You of course need red-green 3D glasses to see why this is so interesting.
The crater rim reminds me of a melting snow and dirt mixture pile.

melting.snow.and.dirt.pile.jpg

Melting dirt and snow pile, Earth
Ha ha! I grabbed this image, as it was the best melting snow and dirt pile I could find on the internet.
I clicked on the link to the page it is on, and the title of the page is Postcards from Pluto.
The author: My name is Amanda Zangari, and I’m a postdoc working on NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto and the Kuiper Belt.

What are the odds?
Anyways, she says some interesting things on her page.
I think I'll send her a thank you card for her dirty snow pile pic. :smile:
 
  • #609
I have compared the previous image with the new and there is something odd. The two bright lights on the right side of the crater are missing. Here is the comparison.
occator comparison.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Dotini
  • #610
Here is a closeup with the profile of the missing spots.
occator comparison 3.jpg
 
  • #611
And here is a closeup of the largest spot. It seems organic to me. If you look carefully you can see cylindrical
occator large spot.jpg
structures, blobs, corrugated tubes, tentacles and a central bulge.
 
  • #612
Zeno Ether said:
I have compared the previous image with the new and there is something odd. The two bright lights on the right side of the crater are missing. Here is the comparison.View attachment 88495

As was posted; "This view is a composite of two images of Occator: one using a short exposure that captures the detail in the bright spots, and one where the background surface is captured at normal exposure".

In the olden days of chemical photography, this technique was known as, um...
I'm old, and can't remember the name. :redface:
It involved wiggling a dark circular piece of paper, on the end of a stick, over the photographic paper, where the photographer knew the image was over-exposed.

The first word to come to mind is "vignette".
But, on further examination, it appears the proper term is expanded to two: Dodging and Burning.
 
  • #613
The previous images were overexposed, so many pixels were pure white without contrast. The new ones have a better dynamic range.
Still surprising that the areas are close to the surrounding terrain in the new images. If the area is really that dynamic, we'll see more changes soon.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #614
mfb said:
If the area is really that dynamic, we'll see more changes soon.
Are we looking at dynamic changes? Perhaps we are dealing with plumes?
 
  • #615
Dotini said:
Are we looking at dynamic changes?
I don't know. Would be amazing.

I'm sure the NASA scientists have or are working on some simulation transforming the new better picture to the conditions of the old picture to see if they are compatible.
 
  • #616
mfb said:
The previous images were overexposed, so many pixels were pure white without contrast. The new ones have a better dynamic range.
Still surprising that the areas are close to the surrounding terrain in the new images. If the area is really that dynamic, we'll see more changes soon.
I don't agree. The two big bright spots on the right have completely vanished in the surrounding terrain, whereas the other dimmer spots are still there in the new processed image. I think maybe NASA has (inadvertently?) erased the spots during post-processing.
 
  • #617
I have another question for you. If the light we see were sunlight reflected by the surface of this "material", there should be some direction, where the surface should be visible without receiving the reflected light, according to the laws of optics. So, there should be the possibility for Dawn to capture an image of the spots without the reflection. If this is not possible then maybe 1) the reflection is diffuse (in all directions) or 2) the material itself is emitting light.
 
Last edited:
  • #618
Zeno Ether said:
... 2) the material itself is emitting light.

hmmm...

That would be interesting. I've been saying for some time that exo-planetary-physics is a bit odd.
But nothing I've ever learned/observed in a half a century tells me that your idea is worth even pondering. Sorry!

ps. I've sent an email to someone who might have access to the original two images. Crossing my fingers.
 
  • #619
Zeno Ether said:
I don't agree. The two big bright spots on the right have completely vanished in the surrounding terrain, whereas the other dimmer spots are still there in the new processed image.
Let the brightness of the environment be 1, the two "vanishing" spots 2 and the other spots 10, in arbitrary units.

Make a picture where 2 is the maximum => vanishing spots are there and look the same as the other spots
Make a picture where 10 is the maximum => vanishing spots look a bit brighter than the surrounding area, but you see a huge difference to the other spots.

Zeno Ether said:
I have another question for you. If the light we see were sunlight reflected by the surface of this "material", there should be some direction, where the surface should be visible without receiving the reflected light, according to the laws of optics. So, there should be the possibility for Dawn to capture an image of the spots without the reflection. If this is not possible then maybe 1) the reflection is diffuse (in all directions) or 2) the material itself is emitting light.
The spots are not visible on the night side.
The reflection is quite diffuse, we have pictures of the spots from many different angles without obvious differences. There might be some peak brightness in some direction, but most angles get similar light.
 
  • #620
Last edited:
  • #621
OmCheeto said:
...
ps. I've sent an email to someone who might have access to the original two images. Crossing my fingers.

Mission success!
2015.09.11 07:15 pm PST
Hi [Om],
I have wondered if you were still following the mission, although I confess to being too busy ever to visit the forum. I'm glad to know your managing to keep busy.

I do have all the Dawn images, but what has been approved for public release is currently available for distribution. Ultimately, of course, all of Dawn's data from all investigations will be released, as it was for Vesta. As we see Occator in each mapping cycle (remember, in this third mapping orbit, we map Ceres six times, or once every 11 days), we will see Occator six times. I imagine that even before the first analysis of the images is complete, our daily release will include some more views which will include raw images. I do recommend some images for the approval process, and based on your message, I will suggest the original images (or something equivalent).

In the meantime, if there's a specific question about the images, let me know.

Thank you for continuing to follow the mission!

Marc
 
  • Like
Likes Zeno Ether, marcus and mfb
  • #622
The more I look at the images of the large spot, the more I have the impression of looking at some sort of lattice with nodes and webs and rays irradiating from a central point.
 
  • #623
Om, I'm so glad you are keeping in touch with Marc Rayman. If you ever have a good opportunity, would you consider asking him about any IR and visible spectroscopic results about the surface chemistry? We are getting all these pictures, in fine detail and from different angles. So topographical info is obviously building up rapidly.
But he mentions the spectroscopy going on at the same time. Can they tell anything about the chemistry from the wavelengths emitted by the surface?

Rahman posted another status update today. A bit of trouble with the main camera (!) that seems to have been resolved.
==quote==
September 14, 2015 - Third Mapping Cycle More Than Half Complete

On Sept. 13, during the seventh transit over the dayside of Ceres in the third mapping cycle, the computer in the camera detected an unexpected condition in the camera and turned off. Engineers observed the situation not long afterwards when Dawn was over the night side of Ceres. In preparation for the next dayside observations, they returned the camera to its normal configuration and confirmed it is healthy.

Today Dawn will observe terrain in the illuminated hemisphere of Ceres for the eighth time. The spacecraft revolves around the dwarf planet every 19 hours, so the twelfth and final dayside pass for this cycle will conclude on Sept. 18.
==endquote==

Third mapping cycle, out of 6 to be completed at this altitude, is in progress. Each cycle takes 12 passes over the dayside. And then a couple of orbits devoted to transmitting images and spectroscopic data. So the work at this altitude will be roughly half completed by 18 September.
In October she fires up her ion thruster again and starts the the most difficult descent spiral of the entire mission.
I'll bring forward the schedule to have it handy:
Code:
Orbit    dates      altitude(km)  pixelsize(m) res/HST  period  soccerball at
RC3    April 23–May 9    (13,600)    (1,300)    24     15 days    (3.0 meters)
Survey    June 6-30      (4,400)      (410)     73     3.1 days    (1.0 meters)
HAMO    Aug 17–Oct 23    (1,470)      (140)     217    19 hours    (33 cm)
LAMO Dec 15–end of mission (375)      (35)      850    5.5 hours    (8.5 cm)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #624
marcus said:
Om, I'm so glad you are keeping in touch with Marc Rayman. If you ever have a good opportunity, would you consider asking him about any IR and visible spectroscopic results about the surface chemistry? We are getting all these pictures, in fine detail and from different angles. So topographical info is obviously building up rapidly.
But he mentions the spectroscopy going on at the same time. Can they tell anything about the chemistry from the wavelengths emitted by the surface?
...

Will do. I have too many questions myself. I saw something about "terraced craters" on Mars the other day, and it reminded me of Ceres: ...Scientists discover strange terraced crater...

By Marc Rayman
JUNE 29, 2015

...
Several craters here have central peaks. The largest also has a ridge at the center. Note other intriguing geological structures, including the terraced walls of that crater and the contrast between the smooth area in the top half of the picture and the more rugged terrain at the bottom.
...

Anyone else have a question? As I recall, I took a survey last time, picked my favorite question, but he answered them all!

I'm most interested in his thoughts on the "Pingo" mountain theory. My first thoughts were that this was some type of photo processing anomaly.
 
  • Like
Likes marcus
  • #625
It would be great if Rayman would comment on any of these questions! I share your curiosity about "pingo" mountain-building on Ceres.
I guess the technical term for mountain-building is orogenesis. Oro- a greek root for mountain is not to be confused with "oreo".

I don't completely understand the pingo ice-pimple process. I think it has to do with the the tendency of water to join with other water when it freezes, rather than freezing in a mix with interspersed grains of mineral. Ice likes to bond with other ice, and that can actually create upthrust pressure and a swollen hump.

I would imagine (Rayman may wish to correct this) that the same process that can raise a 70 meter ice-bump on Earth could raise a bump 30 times higher (>2000 meter or 2 km) on Ceres with its 1/30 strength gravity.
 
  • #626
marcus said:
It would be great if Rayman would comment on any of these questions! I share your curiosity about "pingo" mountain-building on Ceres.
I guess the technical term for mountain-building is orogenesis. Oro- a greek root for mountain is not to be confused with "oreo".

I don't completely understand the pingo ice-pimple process. I think it has to do with the the tendency of water to join with other water when it freezes, rather than freezing in a mix with interspersed grains of mineral. Ice likes to bond with other ice, and that can actually create upthrust pressure and a swollen hump.

I would imagine (Rayman may wish to correct this) that the same process that can raise a 70 meter ice-bump on Earth could raise a bump 30 times higher (>2000 meter or 2 km) on Ceres with its 1/30 strength gravity.

I think I mentioned that the image at first reminded me of "frost heaving". I've seen it before around my house in the winter.
I'd never heard of a "pingo" until I researched "frost heaving".

As far as I understand the pingo process, water collects unevenly, and forms something called an "ice lens". I don't think this type phenomenon would be logical on Ceres, so I'm more inclined towards my original "seed" theory. And, as mfb suggested, I've decided that the adjacent crater, is probably not the motive force, but merely coincidental.

I'll wait until tomorrow to send your question to Marc, as I'll add any additional questions on as a "post script", and hopefully, he'll answer them all. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes marcus
  • #627
OK well my pet question is can he tell us anything about the surface composition of Ceres that has been learned from the IR and visible spectra Dawn has taken so far?

And my pingo conjecture which I hope you try out on him is the same processes could be at work, although perhaps more rarely on Ceres, and could create a comparable pressure, so that a Ceres pingo could be on the order of 30 times higher than an Earth pingo.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #628
marcus said:
OK well my pet question is can he tell us anything about the surface composition of Ceres that has been learned from the IR and visible spectra Dawn has taken so far?

And my pingo conjecture which I hope you try out on him is the same processes could be at work, although perhaps more rarely on Ceres, and could create a comparable pressure, so that a Ceres pingo could be on the order of 30 times higher than an Earth pingo.

Mission [finally :oldeyes:] accomplished.

ps. I sent him a couple of post script message/questions also. :oldbiggrin:
Did Christopher Russell really do an interview with Linda Moulton Howe?
Are you excited about seeing "The Martian"?
 
  • Like
Likes Dotini and marcus
  • #629
OmCheeto said:
Did Christopher Russell really do an interview with Linda Moulton Howe?
Apparently yes, and the louche lady of mysteries asked some good questions and received some intriguing answers.
 
  • #630
Here's text of the interview:
https://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2349&category=Science

He says the VIR (visual and infrared spectrometer) has not reported any surface ice, in particular at the bright spots. So that suggests they might be salt residue left where salty water dried or salty ice sublimated.

Moulton Howe writes the "earth files" blog , I won't say more about her. She interviewed Chris Russell principal investigator for the Dawn mission (their top planetary scientist).
Dotini is right that it was a good interview!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mfb
Back
Top