Electric Field Angle at Origin: 209 deg

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of the electric field at the origin due to two point charges, +20 nC at (2.0 m, 0) and -25 nC at (0, -3.0 m). The initial calculation led to an angle of 29 degrees, but the correct angle is 209 degrees. The confusion arose from the direction of the electric field created by the positive charge, which points away from it. The participants clarified the importance of considering the vector directions when determining the angle. The final conclusion emphasizes the correct understanding of electric field direction in relation to charge types.
sugz
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A +20nC point charge is placed on the x-axis at x = 2.0 m, and a -25 nC point charge is placed on the y-axis at y= -3.0 m. What is the angle that the direction of the electric field at the origin makes with the x-axis.

(a) 209 (deg)
(b) 61 (deg)
(c) 29 (deg)
(d) 241(deg)
(e) 119 (deg)

Homework Equations



E = ke(q/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



E= (8.99x10^9) [ (20x10^-9)/4 (i) - (25x10^-9)/9 (j)]
= (8.99x10^9) [ 5.0x10^-9 (i) - 2.78x10^-9 (j)]
= 44.95i - 24.97j
= 51.42

The angle between the x-axis is arccos(44.95/51.42) = 29 (deg)

But the correct answer is 209 (deg).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sugz said:
E= (8.99x10^9) [ (20x10^-9)/4 (i) - (25x10^-9)/9 (j)]

Check the sign of your first term. Which way does the E field at the origin point when you have a positive charge at x=2m? :smile:
 
Oh makes sense, thank you !:)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K