- #36
gravenewworld
- 1,132
- 26
will.c said:Really? That's how you win at chess? Why don't you stop with the ignorance? If you think one who knows nothing about football shouldn't talk about it, you should really stop talking about chess.
Which goes right along with the Rome analogy. Panem et circenses, right?
I'll give you a hint - enforce the belief in inner city kids that the only way out is to be a pro athlete, and *gasp* they want to be pro athletes! Many of those 'poor kids living in the ghetto' identify with athletes (and rappers, and wrongful convicts). Poor people also play the lottery; as long as we convince them to buy in, it's not really exploitation, is it?
Rome lasted what, 1500 years? You can cry about bread and games all you want.
I'll give you a hint--you are stereotyping, badly. Rather than blaming sports, why don't you point the finger at the real reason why some inner city kids look up to people like pro athletes--like extremely poor public education resources, unqualified teachers, and parents who simply don't care about their children's education. Sometimes the only thing poor kids have to look forward to are sports. Why don't you mention how many kids youth sports programs have saved by giving them something to do rather than hang out in the streets? Oh yeah, let's also ignore the fact that obesity is now a health epidemic not only among adults, but children as well. We should be spending even more money than we do now on sports.
I'm sure you like all of the new lab equipment and all of the scholarships at huge universities like Penn State, TX, etc. that come from the millions that are generated by their football programs. I'm sure you like all of the millions of dollars that the Greenbay Packers dump into their charities since they are a non for profit organization. Maybe if you actually had an open mind and did a cost benefit analysis you would see that the pros far outweigh the cons of placing value on sports.