- #316
- 27,983
- 19,483
weirdoguy said:Let me guess - you didn't come here to learn, did you? You came here to force upon us all of your misconceptions just to tell us that GR is not correct.
weirdoguy said:Let me guess - you didn't come here to learn, did you? You came here to force upon us all of your misconceptions just to tell us that GR is not correct.
Orodruin said:Until you ... pose a properly defined question, all we can do is to point out that you in essence have asked what to do when the traffic light shows blue.
PeroK said:It's too advanced for me to say whether it's elementary or not!
sophiecentaur said:You may have experienced a bit of the PF 'ton of bricks' effect.
Algr said:I'm still not convinced that a billion dollar industry understands the issue better than me. :/
Demystifier said:Or to use your metaphor, perhaps it looks, swims and quacks like a duck, but it was not hatched like a duck.
PeterDonis said:No, because, in the words of Wolfgang Pauli, you are not even wrong.
This was about why we don't learn GR directly from Einstein's papers.jbriggs444 said:Discovering and teaching are different things.
Ibix said:Basically, you have told us where you want to go but not where you are. That makes it tricky to give directions.
Even threads die in a nuclear war.pinball1970 said:@berkeman replied. "We all die and only alligators and cockroaches survive, thanks for the uplifting post.
Thread closed have a nice day."
PeroK said:Perhaps it doesn't matter that it all doesn't matter in the end. It's still important now.
Don van Vliet (a.k.a. Captain Beefheart) said:The stars are matter
We are matter
But it doesn't matter
PeroK said:Perhaps it doesn't matter that it all doesn't matter in the end. It's still important now.
robphy said:In short,
a first year physics course doesn't have space and time
for a good treatment of spacetime.
Vanadium 50 said:This is kind of like having a blind man paint your house with paintballs. I mean, sure, eventually the job will get done, but it may not be the most efficient way.
Thadriel said:I’m sure that when a star is in the process of becoming a black hole, there must therefore be one inside it at some point during the process (correct me if I’m wrong on that). But if so, how long does that take? Could there exist a supergiant star that has a black hole inside it for a long period of time, say, thousands of years, before fully collapsing?
Is it possible for a black hole to be in a star with long term stability, with the star just not collapsing entirely? Like maybe it spins so fast that the outside can stay away from the event horizon?
Orodruin said:No.
Apologies. Check your PMThadriel said:Yes I learned a great deal from that incredibly educational post, and even more so from the further mockery of a non-physicist daring to not already have a complete physics education.
I just looked at your thread on black holes and you seemed to get some serious answers. Am I missing something?Thadriel said:All good friendo. I expect that sort of attitude towards those weirdos who think they’re here to disprove all of science. If I came across that way, that was unintentional.
It was my quote from Orodruin above that amused me. Just some harmless leg pulling till I remembered a post that made me want to smash my tablet not that long ago so I put myself in Thadriels shoes.PeroK said:I just looked at your thread on black holes and you seemed to get some serious answers. Am I missing something?
Yes I got plenty of great answers.PeroK said:I just looked at your thread on black holes and you seemed to get some serious answers. Am I missing something?
I took the MMPI a number of times (unescorted access in commercial nuclear power units). Unless you have seen the MMPI you probably don't realize how funny @collinsmark is.collinsmark said:(I really wish, for fun, somebody would have put T/F "The eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are always real," on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory [MMPI] exam.)
Vanadium 50 said:It's always a "paradox". Never "something I don't understand"
Huh. Just now I got a letter from an old friend in which he disproves Bell's Theorem because "scientists got the math wrong." He wants my comments. I'm tempted to tell him it's a work of genius, but might stick with "very interesting."Thadriel said:All good friendo. I expect that sort of attitude towards those weirdos who think they’re here to disprove all of science. If I came across that way, that was unintentional.
Yes, that's paradox.berkeman said:I'm guessing V50 is near the top of that list...
I am not upvoting that. I work very hard and get paid for not producing results.Tom.G said:From a string of posts complaining about corporate re-configuring of their work computers.
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/6657655/
"... but it's academia, we are getting paid for producing results, not for how, when and with which system settings we do that."
Quality Assurance?pinball1970 said:I work very hard and get paid for not producing results.
Not all techs work in QA you know.Ibix said:Quality Assurance?
pinball1970 said:I work very hard and get paid for not producing results.
Ibix said:Quality Assurance?