Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Members
In summary: And to obtain just one arsenic atom, you would need to buy 285 million one ounce bottles!There's also the fact that anyone prescribing homeopathic medicine should be required to accept homeopathic payment which of course is an empty envelope that... doesn't really exist.
  • #526
jack action said:
We already have it in French. :-p
Well dang. I've had this happen before. Last time it was Apocalypso. Someday soon anything you can imagine will already be there. Then what?

A ChatLSD search turned up the Charles Schwab brokerage. Who knew?

There was a ChatLSD on Instagram that has been removed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #527
Hornbein said:
Who knew?
Timothy Leary?
 
  • #528
PeroK said:
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
  • Like
Likes Flyboy, berkeman, Hornbein and 3 others
  • #529
pbuk said:
... if only there were some way of searching for information on the internet :wink:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman, phinds, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #530
PeroK said
This process of continually updating one's knowledge of a subject is called learning. It's the opposite of religiously adhering to an established view in the face of evidence to the contrary.
I might borrow this one, if you don't mind.

-Dan
 
  • #531
Swamp Thing said:
This deserves to be in this thread in its own right, yeah?
That was my complaint about the title "Breaking bad."
 
  • #532
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #533
In a discussion about a woman who had 69 children from 27 pregnancies (all multiple births):
BillTre said:
27 x .75 = 20.25 years
That so much more reasonable.
Very fertile, but also efficient.
 
  • #534
About questionable results in a new paper:

Vanadium 50 said:
At least it puts the woo in woo hoo.

:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, BillTre and topsquark
  • #535
When trying to help an EE student with analyzing fairly simple circuits, and they keep trying to use SPICE to guide their learning...

DaveE said:
You'll learn a lot more about electronics if you solve simple circuits with math before you simulate them. Simulations only give you answers, not reasons.
 
  • Like
  • Care
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #536
russ_watters said:
As a rule of thumb, when the first thing someone tells you is that their invention isn't a perpetual motion machine (before you can even think to ask), that means it's a perpetual motion machine.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, DennisN, Bystander and 5 others
  • #537
That sounds like a conversation that could go on forever.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #538
gleem said:
There is no universal Least Action path to happiness.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, Vanadium 50, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #539
This one is way over my head... :smile:

Vanadium 50 said:
The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
  • #540
There is an explanation in that thread.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
  • #541
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

andresB said:
Do you already know what the axioms of nature are?
 
  • #542
While trying to give a B-level reply to a question about the speed of propagation of changes in spacetime...

Ibix said:
It's actually quite difficult to come up with a well-defined way of saying what you are trying to say without either resorting to postgrad maths or saying something not really accurate and crossing your fingers behind your back and hoping nobody asks awkward questions.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Ibix
  • #543
berkeman said:
From a thread where a math major is complaining that when he had to take a mandatory Physics course, he found the math in it to be very non-rigorous and not based on axioms...

From the very same thread:
russ_watters said:
I guarantee any stroke QM could give a mathematician, an engineer could make worse.
 
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude and DaveE
  • #544
From a thread discussing WiFi and Routers, @Vanadium 50 observed:

The number on the box is really mostly irrelevant. "Up to X Mbps" just means that they promise you won't get X+1.
 
  • #545
Vanadium on a post regarding David McCallum TV series.

pinball1970 said:
The Invisible man" 1975 series
V50 "I could never see him in that role."
 
  • Love
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes nsaspook, BillTre and DennisN
  • #546
Vanadium 50 said:
I could never see him in that role.
Not to be outdone our talented, the lovely,our very own @DennisN !!
"Also, as far as I can remember, the portrayal of the character was rather transparent."
 
  • #547
From a discussion in the Engineering forums about a part that a new user wants help designing:

Baluncore said:
If you have ignored the obvious failure modes, and so build a house of cards, that design failure may later be investigated by a Coroner.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and DaveC426913
  • #548
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #549
berkeman said:
From a discussion thread in the Academic Advising forum where a newbie is asking for advice about learning resources...

gmax137 said:
As others have noted, learning physics by reading alone would be like learning to play piano by reading a book. It simply is not possible.
But the skills are transferable...

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PeroK, collinsmark and berkeman
  • #550
Ibix said:
If I tell you that a scribblex is a fooddely scribblex if the warghandle is zero you might (reasonably) complain that this does not help you to understand what I'm talking about.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #551
gleem said:
Decisions made by emotional inclinations can be risky or just dumb.
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #552
Exactly. How many times have you grabbed the vanilla ice cream only to beat yourself up later knowing you should have gotten chocolate?
 
  • #553
Haborix said:
How many times have you grabbed the vanilla ice cream only to beat yourself up later knowing you should have gotten chocolate?
I solve this problem by not liking chocolate ice cream. :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes Wrichik Basu, BillTre, phinds and 2 others
  • #554
Agreed. IMHO, (French) vanilla is the only real flavor of ice cream!

-Dan
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Wrichik Basu, Borg, Bystander and 1 other person
  • #555
Emack and Bolio's "Chocolate Moose" ice cream is excellent. But their "Vanilla Bean Speck" is outstanding.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #556
Well, if we are going to be picky, I’d almost always take butter pecan over either vanilla or chocolate.
 
  • #557
By @Baluncore in Engineering and Computer Sci Homework Help

Be productive, play LTspice simulation of circuits, not video games.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #558
Haborix said:
Well, if we are going to be picky, I’d almost always take butter pecan over either vanilla or chocolate.
I would agree w/ you about that but then we'd both be wrong. :oldlaugh:
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre
  • #559
Nice metaphor by V50 when giving advice in the Academic Advising forum to a user who is considering switching majors into a more narrow specialty...

Vanadium 50 said:
If you shoot for such a narrow target, what happens if you miss?
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G
  • #560
Well worth keeping in mind, I think:
PeterDonis said:
The fact that quantum systems behave highly non-classically in some cases does not mean they do so in all cases.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top