Great one-liners from PF members

  • Thread starter sysprog
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Members
In summary: And to obtain just one arsenic atom, you would need to buy 285 million one ounce bottles!There's also the fact that anyone prescribing homeopathic medicine should be required to accept homeopathic payment which of course is an empty envelope that... doesn't really exist.
  • #631
Well it easy to get psyched up if you don't know the problems.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #632
phinds said:
In a thread about those who decide to build a particle accelerator in their basement

I think this stems from Michio Kaku’s book “hyperspace” where he claims to have built a “particle accelerator” in his garage while in high school.

He’s rather trite imo.

Personal Commentary: I hate pop-sci. Sometimes it seems necessary to get the general public interested……and at other times it seems like a ploy for some to glean unwarranted notoriety;

“look at me I’m so smart I argue with neckbeards about Bigfoot on twitter, I am the embodiment of intellect”

None of this serves to help actual Physics students advance.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #633
PhDeezNutz said:
I think this stems from Michio Kaku’s book “hyperspace” where he claims to have built a “particle accelerator” in his garage while in high school.
Maybe he did and the radiation exposure did something to the part of his brain that is supposed to instantiate humility.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, Klystron, BillTre and 3 others
  • #634
PhDeezNutz said:
Personal Commentary: I hate pop-sci.
You might feel even more strongly about it if you had to moderate here... :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes Astronuc, pinball1970, Borg and 3 others
  • #635
PeterDonis said:
You might feel even more strongly about it if you had to moderate here... :wink:

That is not a burden I am ready for. I am not advanced enough in my general understanding of physics (partially because I was disillusioned by pop science for many years) nor as an emotionally stable adult.

To that end I appreciate the efforts of the Mentors to keep discussions substantive and “in bounds”.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, BillTre, phinds and 1 other person
  • #636
PhDeezNutz said:
That is not a burden I am ready for.
To be clear, I wasn't implying that you should become a moderator, just commenting on how "pop-sci" looks to moderators. (Michio Kaku is currently number 2 on my list of "people whose pop sci I wish would totally disappear", not far behind Brian Greene at number 1.)
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Astronuc and pinball1970
  • #637
PhDeezNutz said:
To that end I appreciate the efforts of the Mentors to keep discussions substantive and “in bounds”.
Thanks for the kudos! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #638
PeterDonis said:
I wasn't implying that you should become a moderator, just commenting on how "pop-sci" looks to moderators. (Michio Kaku is currently number 2 on my list of "people whose pop sci I wish would totally disappear", not far behind Brian Greene at number 1.)

I know you weren’t implying I was ready for it, it was just a set up to say that I appreciate your efforts and those of other Mentors.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, berkeman, sysprog1 and 1 other person
  • #639
Vanadium 50 said:
But nobody wants to tell billionaires "no" when they have their checkbooks out.
True facts.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, PhDeezNutz and berkeman
  • #640
From a discussion of using waveguides rather than free-space propagation:

Baluncore said:
Think inside the box.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes russ_watters, marcusl, Hornbein and 6 others
  • #641
From a thread on determining the volume of a star in GR:

Vanadium 50 said:
Is it worth pointing out that the difference between Newton and Einstein is much, much smaller than the uncertainty on where a star's surface actually is?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #642
In a thread on the maximum energy of a photon based on frame of reference
jbriggs444 said:
the total energy in the observable universe is an upper bound on photon energy ... the ability to collect that energy into a single photon would pose a significant engineering challenge.
Love that dry humor.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #643
From a discussion about hiking in the Grand Canyon in the summer.
russ_watters said:
It's easy to get in serious trouble if you don't appreciate the risks.

Seems to be applicable to much in life.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #645
From the Crowdstrike Debacle thread:

Vanadium 50 said:
Too many clones almost wiped out bananas.

(well, I guess you had to be there...) :smile:
 
  • #646
Sorry, sorry, more than one line. But way too classic...

WWGD said:
From the Olympics:
" Are you a Pole Vaulter?"
" No, I'm German. How did you know my name is Walter?"
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes phinds, pinball1970, PhDeezNutz and 3 others
  • #647
Vanadium 50 said:
Experimenters are not the oompa-loompas of science.

Need I say more? It's a very delicate symbiotic relationship between theorists and experimentalists. One is not greater than the other.............and people who think this are just not experienced enough to realize this. And if they have enough experience and still think this........they are willingly ignorant.

Edit: not sure if this one has already been mentioned.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes jrmichler, BillTre, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #648
It's from The Big Bang Theory.

 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #649
Vanadium 50 said:
It's from The Big Bang Theory
Don't forget Roald Dahl!
 
  • #650
I believe those were the Oompa-Loompas of Loompa Land.

I doubt that the original message did any good. Too many people come here and say "I got an A in 12th grade physics. I do not wish to soil my hands with your dirty, filth experimental work. And with grades like mine, I shann't have to!"

Whatever.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and BillTre
  • #651
Vanadium 50 said:
I believe those were the Oompa-Loompas of Loompa Land.

I doubt that the original message did any good. Too many people come here and say "I got an A in 12th grade physics. I do not wish to soil my hands with your dirty, filth experimental work. And with grades like mine, I shann't have to!"

Whatever.

Yeah it’s definitely a misconception and a problem.
 
  • #652
From a thread discussing differentiation and its definition(s)...

fresh_42 said:
I like to say that if you read two authors you will find four notations.
 
  • Like
Likes tellmesomething
  • #653
Is that like "If you lined all the economists in Washington end to end you still wouldn't reach a conclusion"?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and phinds
  • #654
BvU said:
And those that try to help you are not from the telepathy department.
This was in response to:
pallab said:
I am not from control theory background.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PhDeezNutz, phinds, fresh_42 and 2 others
  • #655
Vanadium 50 said:
How much repulsion do you need to add together to make it attractive?
LOL. I *think* he's referring to the electrons, but it may also be the thread.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Back
Top